Free grader checks websites' suitability for smartphones

Summary: BlueTrain Mobile is offering a free web-based site-checker that rates websites for their performance on smartphones. For web designers, it provides a quick way to check updates to a website to see if changes have made the performance better or worse.

BlueTrain Mobile is offering a free web-based site-checker that rates websites for their performance on smartphones. For web designers, it provides a quick way to check updates to a website to see if changes have made the performance better or worse.

Mobile Grader rates some features either pass or fail. For example, sites that use Adobe Flash or "hover states" will lose five points in each case. Other features, such as page size and download speed, are rated against a representative selection of 100 different mobile sites. BlueTrain says the sites on its Mobile 100 have been chosen "to create a realistic benchmark against well-known brands and the mobile versions of their websites" across a variety of industries.

The scoring weights are given in the table below.

In a blog post, Griffin Mahoney, Mobile Grader's designer, is soliciting "any ideas for what we should add" to the benchmark.

Websites often perform badly on smartphones: they have smaller screens, much less memory, slower processors, and less capable browsers than PCs. The biggest improvement can therefore be gained by having a simplified, mobile-oriented version of a website. This adds 35 points to the score. Beyond that, there are benefits from reducing page load sizes and the number of elements that have to be downloaded.

Walgreens' mobile site Walgreens' mobile site (viewed on a PC)

Walgreens, the US retail chain, has got close to perfection with a mobile site that comprises a small (1.4K) red logo plus a simple text menu. It scores 98 percent.

However, Andy Komack, BlueTrain's vice president of marketing, says "it's unlikely that the goal of any marketer should be to achieve a perfect score. Rather… they should allow room for aesthetic imagery, unique mobile content, and other elements that might lower a Mobile Grader score, but are necessary to achieve the intended marketing result."

@jackschofield

Mobile Grader Score Weights Mobile Grader Score Weights

Topic: Tech Industry

Jack Schofield

About Jack Schofield

Jack Schofield spent the 1970s editing photography magazines before becoming editor of an early UK computer magazine, Practical Computing. In 1983, he started writing a weekly computer column for the Guardian, and joined the staff to launch the newspaper's weekly computer supplement in 1985. This section launched the Guardian’s first website and, in 2001, its first real blog. When the printed section was dropped after 25 years and a couple of reincarnations, he felt it was a time for a change....

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

3 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • The BlueTrain is on the right track!
    Zutronic-cccf7
  • Problem with this is Mobile Grader doesn't check the whole of the websites' functionality. For example it reported a forum I use as being good because it had no hover-states. In fact the forum DOES have hover-states, only they're on php generated pages created when you hit a link from the main page to one of the actual forum pages.

    It's a bit of fun but not much more.

    Any web designer without the common sense to consider the impact of their products on mobile devices really shouldn't be doing the job. Unfortunately in my experience that statement covers most website designers.
    AndyPagin-3879e
  • Hmmm, interesting gadget - ran it on my site and I passed some, failed some... got my work cut out now.
    Cendecon