Google Glass already facing driving ban as West Virginia preps law
Summary: Who said the lawmakers can't keep pace with technology?
Lawmakers in the US have proposed a bill outlawing operating a vehicle with head-mounted displays like Google Glass, even before the networked specs are commercially available.
West Virginia Legislature Republican Gary G Howell last week proposed a bill that would prohibit "using a wearable computer with head mounted display", preemptively bringing Google's technology in line with existing state bans on driving while texting or using a phone without a handsfree kit.
Howell told ZDNet's sister site CNET that he believes the government has a duty make sure citizens don't injure or kill someone else when they cross the road because they're reading a message.
"I actually like the idea of the product and I believe it is the future, but last legislature we worked long and hard on a no-texting-and-driving law," Howell told CNET.
"It is mostly the young that are the tech-savvy that try new things. They are also our most vulnerable and underskilled drivers. We heard of many crashes caused by texting and driving, most involving our youngest drivers. I see the Google Glass as an extension."
Howell's proposed ban on networked specs while driving would make an exception for law enforcement and other emergency services officers.
The lawmaker was not confident the bill will pass, however, but believes that other similar legislation will follow.
Earlier this month, the 5 Point Cafe in Seattle, Washington made headlines by also preemptively banning patrons from wearing Google Glass in the cafe to protect the privacy of other customers.
The bill comes as more US states pass laws permitting Google's Project X innovation on roads: Google's autonomous cars. California followed Nevada's lead by allowing Google to drive the cars — as long as a human is behind the wheel — on state roads.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Studies?
dsf3g
The So called "lawmaker" is a moron like his supporters
Howell is mentally damaged, he isn't mentally equipped to handle a bicycle let alone anything with 4 wheels. I doubt if he could understand a horse and buggy, he is so dim.
Drivers already have GPS,
Also, the knuckleheads that txt and drive will anyway, just like that idiot reads the paper while driving to work every day.
Need vs want
Unless I'm wrong, Google Glass isn't used to specifically navigate the vehicle; it's not a needed part of driving a commercial vehicle.
Not needed maybe...
In or On a Vehicle
These idiots with "ban while driving" are beyond moronistic.
Dude
stats on what?
What, exactly, do they have stats on? Trying to type a text message while driving? If you can't see the difference between removing one or both hands from the wheel, looking down into your lap, and trying to position your fingers to hit those smallish letters and having a GPS image or message in the top-right coner of your peripherial vision and why the statistics from one might not necessarily apply to the other, I think you are delusional.
Now, I'm not saying people are going to drive exactly as well with a text message on their glasses but what I am saying is we currently DON'T KNOW. The question is whether it's more distracting than trying to change the radio station. If less, then we need to ban in-car radios before Google Glass.
Batter Safe than Sorry
It will be too late to rethink, when you die in a car accident and the other party was wearing Google Glass and flirting with someone on Facebook.
Nobody prevents you from using the gadgets in your private property.
Could be useful, but it WON'T be
Sadly, *everyone* here knows that a "Google Glass" type device would be used by *most* drivers to watch YouTube, read email or other entertainment while they drive. And if you believe otherwise, I've got a bridge I'd like to sell you...
Good idea
75MPH is asinine, saves little time, and wastes gas and oil
Society has to change for the benefit of everyone that lives in it, or else we are not a society but a large gaggle of parasites that live by sucking off of each others' blood, starting from the top down and those at the bottom are usually the dried and empty husks...
Re: Society has to change
Fighter pilots don't have pedestrians
It's not like there's a whole heck of a lot of things at 30,000 feet that you have to avoid.
They also don't wear them directly over the eye, so line of site is not an issue.
(* wouldn't let me use the actual word)
Catch up
Pretty freakingly awesome.
technology replaces human thinking
They don't have those things, however during combat
Which is why it is displaying info from what's happening around them
Some cars have HUD that allow them to see their speed without looking away from the road.
Glasses like these would do the opposite.
Yes!