Google poised to act on 'right to be forgotten' requests, after 50,000 are filed

Google poised to act on 'right to be forgotten' requests, after 50,000 are filed

Summary: Google is expected to remove the first links from search results following Europe's landmark privacy ruling in May.

TOPICS: Privacy, Google, Legal, EU

Google is preparing to start removing the first batch of links from its search results in line with a European court ruling on the so-called 'right to be forgotten'.

According to The New York Times, Google will begin removing the first of those search results in June.

The European Court of Justice ruled in May that search engines are considered data controllers under European law and must therefore consider all requests by users to stop returning links to irrelevant or outdated information when  searches are made for their name. The pages the links lead to can, however, remain online and any link omissions will only occur when searches are made in Europe.

To comply with the ruling, Google last month launched a new web form for Europeans to file their removal requests. Within 24 hours, Google had received 12,000 submissions through the form, climbing to 41,000 after five days. Twenty days after launching the web form, the NYT says, that number hit 50,000. The new figures suggest the rate of requests being filed appears to have slowed.

Google began notifying those that have submitted a request this week that they would soon be acted upon, according to the NYT.

The ruling has put Google and its fellow search engines in the awkward position of having to determine whether removal requests comply with Europe's data protection laws. At Google, according to the report, submissions are being reviewed by an internal team led by Google's legal department.

If Google knocks back a request, the complainant can take their case to their local data protection authority for review.

Europe's data protection watchdogs are currently working on new guidelines to ensure complaints are handled consistently across the European Union. The guidelines are expected to be released by September but until then, Google and any other search engine that receives a request will have to assess its merits on their own.

Google has expressed its disappointment with the ruling, with the company's chairman Eric Schmidt saying the court struck the wrong balance between the right to know and right to be forgotten.

The Guardian reported earlier this month that Google is considering placing an alert at the bottom of each page where it has removed a result, similar to the way the company discloses that it has removed links after receiving takedown requests under the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

Google has established a council of advisors that will shape its policy in response to the ECJ ruling. The advisors include Schmidt and Google's chief counsel David Drummond who will sit alongside Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales and Luciano Floridi, a philosopher at the Oxford Internet Institute.

Google did not respond to request for comment.

Read more on the right to be forgotten

Topics: Privacy, Google, Legal, EU

Liam Tung

About Liam Tung

Liam Tung is an Australian business technology journalist living a few too many Swedish miles north of Stockholm for his liking. He gained a bachelors degree in economics and arts (cultural studies) at Sydney's Macquarie University, but hacked (without Norse or malicious code for that matter) his way into a career as an enterprise tech, security and telecommunications journalist with ZDNet Australia. These days Liam is a full time freelance technology journalist who writes for several publications.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • @Liam_Tung

    How about giving us some news on what other search providers in Europe are doing in respect of this legislation ... How are Bing and AskJeeves handling this?

    If someone did really want some search result removed from the Web (when looking from inside of Europe only) what would they "Really" need to do, just how many web forms, emails or letters would they actually need to submit and just how long would it realisticly take?
  • Depends on the site

    It only applies to the European Google's. Go to and the link will still be there. Also Google will leave a standard "one entry removed due to complaint" message so you will know something is up and may well be able to do some detective work.

    You could then blog about it and Google would pick it up in its search....

    Google can just say no and request you go through a legal process to have the link(s) removed.

    Sites like DuckDuckGo don't operate from Europe, so the legislation does not apply to them.

    Might be the best way to be forgotten, is to not ask to be forgotten.
    • All that said

      Is the focus only on Google? --- Seems that's all the Media is interested in --- Google bashing!

      @dcarmi: All that you have said is true except that DuckDuckGo is an 'Aggregator' and therefore not affected by the legislation as I understand it.

      My actual question doesn't relate to Google at all but to the entirety of the EU judgement and I'm merely highlighting the fact that @Liam_Tung is just simply rehashing what is on any other news site and not giving us any proper analysis of the situation.

      I read articles on this site to get a fuller understanding of tech news not a watered down Sun headline :-(