Google 'worried' by might of Samsung on Android
Summary: The success of Samsung in the Android ecosystem is causing worries within Google, according to a report.
Samsung's dominance of Android is causing fears at Google that the South Korean smartphone maker may "flex its muscles" to renegotiate the pair's commercial terms, according to a report by the Wall Street Journal.
At a meeting last year, Google's Android chief Andy Rubin told executives he was delighted by Samsung's Android sales, but also warned it could become a threat if it increased its lead amongst Android manufacturers, according to the report.
The threat centres on the possibility that Samsung is in a position to demand a greater share of Google's mobile advertising revenues derived from search and other products.
Samsung shipped 42 percent of the Android phones in 2012, with the next in line shipping just six percent, according to the latest figures from analyst firm Gartner. Rival analyst firm IDC put Samsung's smartphone shipments at 215 million for the year, which account for 30 percent of the market and are well ahead of HTC's 32 million.
Given Samsung's dominance of smartphones and its rising share of tablet shipments, it could demand a larger cut on Google's revenues from Google search and YouTube. One fear for Google could be that Samsung follows Amazon's approach to the Kindle, which forked Android and cut off the core Google apps that generate revenue for the search company.
Google's acquisition of Motorola Mobility, which makes smartphones and the Xoom tablet, was an "insurance policy" against such an event, according to the report.
Samsung, of course, is also moving to reduce its reliance on Android as Google develops its plans around the rumoured X Phone, with the scheduled release of Samsung handsets based on the Tizen OS later this year.
On March 14 Samsung will unveil the Galaxy S4, which is the only line of Android smartphones to challenge Apple's iPhone at the high end of the market.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
Hahahahaha
The RAZR MAXX HD beats it for Build Quality, Screen, and Battery life bit loses out on Camera.
The Note 2 pretty much beats it everywhere except for intuitive front end. Samsung has jacked Android all up.
Have you seen he size of he Droid DNA
I have seen it
re: managed to outsell all other phones
Might be, people just had an already good mobile phone and just wanted a min-tablet?
Droid = Sh!t
funny nonsense :-)
Nonsense
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9236069/Google_other_tech_firms_among_top_lobbying_spenders_in_US (Google spent $16.48 million vs. Microsoft spent $8.09 million)
Obama and Google are in bed:
http://money.cnn.com/2009/10/21/technology/obama_google.fortune/
Now tell me who is corrupting Governments more and taking advantage of personal relationships. Hint: It is not Microsoft.
there a difference between gross and efficient spending
MSFT may have bought their congress people years ago and now only require maintenance payments. Google is having to buy them up new.
Re: Who is corrupting governments more..
Not to worry,
Yes, we all bought a great phone...then were quickly forgotten by Samsung. My current Note has all the hardware needed, but isn't getting updated to JB. The Galaxy Tab 10.1 I bought is also sadly forgotten now by Sammy.
I have now decided it's Samsung? Samsung who?
With Samsung
I hate to say it but, if I cannot find a decent battery case for the Droid DNA, my disdain for Samsung might actually push me to an iPhone 5!
Another ignorant post about no upgrades
You see, since you already bought the phone from whatever carrier, you aren't worth their time. OTOH, if they knew what you were posting here, they might be ignoring you on general principles...
Funny Apple can do upgrades
Apple upgrades
Simple Reason...
a) Low end cheap phones with out-dated versions of Android OS.
b) High end phones with great screens and processors. 1080p. Etc. But only 16GB of internal memory and no expansion slots.
Seriously, this latter is a DEAL BREAKER for most. And this is why beautiful phones by HTC, LG, and other sit on the shelves.
Oh, and then we have Windows 8 phone. Okay, try to get the Nokia 920....not available, exclusive to AT&T. That was super dumb. You do NOT make a phone exclusive to one carrier when trying to break into a crowded market.
So those who want a Windows 8 phone have no top tier phone option outside of AT&T. Only a mid-range phone.
These are CEO mistakes, ...
These are CEO mistakes.
Local storage will always be required till the bandwidth is uncapped and LTE(or greater) are standard.
Re: drop the lumia 920
Good luck with a better phone with removable storage next year.
this is how Apple started with iPhones
WP8
That's assuming people want a WP8 phone. Judging by the delining share, I'd say nobody wants it.
Actually it is not declining