Government: McKinnon will be extradited

Government: McKinnon will be extradited

Summary: After listening to appeals, the Home Office says it will press ahead with the extradition of the NASA hacker despite concerns over 'unfair' extradition treatment

TOPICS: Security

Gary McKinnon, the so-called "NASA Hacker", is to be extradited to the US within the next two weeks, the Home Office announced on Thursday.

In May, McKinnon lost his appeal against extradition and has been waiting for the final decision of the Home Secretary, John Reid.

"Mr McKinnon had exercised his right to submit representations against return but the Secretary of State did not consider the issues raised availed Mr McKinnon," the Home Office said in a statement. "Mr McKinnon now has the opportunity, within 14 days, to appeal against the decisions of the District Judge/Secretary of State."

The news came the day after Boris Johnson MP went into print to condemn the British Government's handling of extradition to the US. McKinnon is facing extradition under the Extradition Treaty of 2003 which was rushed into law after the terrorist attacks of 11 September, 2001.

[? /*CMS poll(20004247) */ ?]

But, as Johnson pointed out in an article published in the Daily Telegraph on Thursday, the Act has not been ratified by the US Government, so while McKinnon is being extradited to the US under the terms of the Act, the UK Government cannot extradite a US citizen to the UK.

McKinnon was accused of one of the biggest military hacks ever, when he hacked into a series of sites belonging to the US Army, Air Force, Department of Defence and, most famously, NASA.

The US Government alleged that McKinnon's hacking activities caused $700,000 (£380,000) worth of damage. McKinnon has always denied causing any damage to the US systems and under the terms of the controversial Extradition Treaty, the US Government has not been required to show any evidence.

McKinnon has always maintained that his activities were harmless and that he was more concerned with finding evidence of extra-terrestrial activity than causing damage, but he did admit to causing some damage through wiping some files. McKinnon maintained he only able to gain access to the systems because security was lax.

Topic: Security


Colin Barker is based in London and is Senior Reporter for ZDNet. He has been writing about the IT business for some 30-plus years. He still enjoys it.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Blair is too busy wanting to be Dubya's pal that he is prepared to bend over backward to accommodate him irrespective of whether it is leagal or not.

    We went to war on a pack of lies and now give up our people irrespective of whether there is a case to answer or not. If the US can not put up sufficient evidence to convince an individual should be liable for extradition this should not be allowed on a whim.

    It appears that Tony is too busy looking for his place in history to give a damn about the people he is supposed to serve and support.
  • The result of the poll assigned to this article highlights the Brits preoccupation with procedure over outright culpability. That is [of course] inversely, perversely proportional to the hypocritical hilarity with which same treats its Royals in society and in the press. For instance.

    McKinnon committed what would be treason in a U.S. wartime venue. The kindest cut that would be proportional to his 'indisgression' would be The Needle. Submitting to gang rape during a life sentence in prison is perhaps the kinder, gentler preoccupation of liberal minds - empty minds.

    Mommy and Daddy should have let Mr. McKinnon in on the concept of other people's property. In this case, he compromised the intellectual property of We, The People.

    Bad dog!