Government unveils cut-price ID card

Government unveils cut-price ID card

Summary: The £30 card is aimed at lower-income groups, but questions remain over the pricing of the full-blown ID card scheme

SHARE:
TOPICS: Tech Industry
1

The government has agreed to a cut-price, £30 standalone national ID card for the elderly and those on low incomes who do not have a passport.

The cut-price card will be available to those who choose not to hold a passport but will be valid as a travel document within the European Union.

Home Secretary Charles Clarke said the subsidised, standalone 10-year ID card fits in with Home Office spending plans and current financial estimates of the ID cards scheme.

But the government still refuses to disclose how much it intends to charge the majority of the population for the combined biometric passport and ID card package that will be introduced from 2008.

The current Home Office "best estimate" for the average unit cost of producing the combined passport and ID card package is £93, but the London School of Economics claims the unit cost will be closer to £300.

In a written answer to a parliamentary question, Clarke also revealed the Home Office commissioned accountancy firm KPMG to carry out a review of the ID cards costing methodology.

KPMG has concluded the costing is "robust and appropriate" but recommended improvements to the sensitivity analysis and revisiting some of the cost assumptions. The Home Office says it plans to publish an executive summary of the KPMG report "in due course".

In a rallying call, before next Tuesday's crucial House of Commons vote on the Identity Cards Bill, Clarke said: "In future, the recording of biometrics, such as fingerprints, iris patterns or facial image means that we will have a much stronger way of linking identity to the person. A national ID card will be a robust, secure way to establish that identities are real, not fabricated."

The Home Office has already admitted to spending more than £20m on the ID card scheme before the bill has even been put on the Statute Book.

Topic: Tech Industry

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

1 comment
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Not so long ago scientists and all actually believed that smoking was good for you. The cause for all that was sponsored misinformation (self-interested commercial lobbying) and it took decades and many lives to rewrite the history books on that subject.

    Today we have rows of decision makers that actually believe the PR FUD thrown at them by various technical institutions. And neither have real accountability for the consequences of their actions.

    Excuse me for having some reservations about this brave new world that most IT clueless decision makers seem to invision.

    One size fits all doesn't work. And what also doesn't work is the consessions made afterwards in the hope to fit as much as possible in the still present 'one size fits all' mindset.

    The simple truth is: if you can't manage diversity then redo from scratch. There are only two constants in IT: damage and change (in all ways). Master those two first and IT becomes easy. Don't and you can expect a world of hurt usually translated in business talk like: learning curves, start problems, unforseen events and... oops.
    anonymous