Hands-on with Nokia's Android X and XL devices

Hands-on with Nokia's Android X and XL devices

Summary: At Mobile World Congress, ZDNet got a quick look at Nokia's new Android device range. How does it measure up to the competition?

SHARE:

 |  Image 1 of 11

  • Thumbnail 1
  • Thumbnail 2
  • Thumbnail 3
  • Thumbnail 4
  • Thumbnail 5
  • Thumbnail 6
  • Thumbnail 7
  • Thumbnail 8
  • Thumbnail 9
  • Thumbnail 10
  • Thumbnail 11
  • If Android is the gateway to a Windows Phone, Nokia has made sure to keep the Android experience on its new X devices one that makes Windows Phone shine.

    Announced today, Nokia's new line of Android-based handsets — the Nokia X, X+ and XL — are destined for the sub-$200 smartphone market, and at that price consumers can't be too dissatisfied with the low-end specs they come with: don't expect a top end camera or loads of memory, but there's a Qualcomm's Snapdragon processor under the hood.

  • The larger of the three X devices, the single or dual-SIM XL, will be available for €109 and ships with miniscule storage capacity of 4GB in the form of an SD card, which leaves little room for apps, let alone media. However, it can be replaced with cards up to 32GB.

    The model above was on display at Nokia's stand at the MWC event, where the X line was launched today, has just 768MB RAM. 

Topics: Mobility, Android, Microsoft, MWC, Nokia

Liam Tung

About Liam Tung

Liam Tung is an Australian business technology journalist living a few too many Swedish miles north of Stockholm for his liking. He gained a bachelors degree in economics and arts (cultural studies) at Sydney's Macquarie University, but hacked (without Norse or malicious code for that matter) his way into a career as an enterprise tech, security and telecommunications journalist with ZDNet Australia. These days Liam is a full time freelance technology journalist who writes for several publications.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

5 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Lumia Line is Better

    I think the low end Lumia 520 is proven to be a great phone and likely better than Android-X, and the new Lumia 928 and Lumia Icon are far better. Why again does Nokia want to make this phone? To get people to upgrade to Lumia?
    Sean Foley
    • It's inreresting, thats for sure!

      I had a 620 and found it acceptable and competitive at launch under £200

      I ditched it due to app support and 0 ui bug fixed in the 8 months I onwed it.

      If this is a fork of android, app support will be key. Only three api changes from upstream should give it a huge list of apps compared to it's bigger brother, you just have to figure out how to install them without gplay.

      As a replacement to the 520 and 620? I suppose less cost could be used on componenents... Good replacement to asha ... Time will tell about win phone. So long as they don't loose interest in it as fast as previous attempts, seems good...
      MarknWill
    • Cheaper Phone for Lower-end Markets

      Of course it's not "better"... they're making a phone that can retail for under $100 or so.

      Why, or why Nokia? Both have the same answer: other countries. Nokia sells something like 70% of all the cellphones in Africa. Most of these are $35-$50 candybar-style dumb phones, but that's their market. The Asha phones have been an attempt to move to a smart/feature platform. We in the West think mostly about smartphones, and we GEEKs in the West think mostly about high-end smartphones, both because what's what's usually in our pockets, and because that's the fun end of the spectrum to follow. But it's not the whole world, and really, Nokia needs whatever business they can keep.

      Yes, the Lumia 520 sold very well (for a Windows Phone, anyway) in some lower income areas of the world. But Nokia had cut that to under a 5% margin, barely worth selling... they were making 12-15% margin on Asha phones sold for even less. The goal here is clearly to make a device they can sell into lower-end markets, and profitably. I'm kind of surprised Nokia went to Android on this. But the cost of supporting a whole OS of your own is huge, even for stripped-down operating systems like NOKIA40 on the Asha phone. Windows Phone has very strict rules about the hardware it's allowed to run on, so it can only go so low, at least for now. Android can certainly use a fast, multicore processor, but it does run on lower-spec gear.

      The other issue for many countries is power -- you can't sell many phones in Africa that don't have a very long battery life, simply because power isn't such a reliable thing in many parts of Africa. They like the basic Nokia candybar phones because they go a week on a charge, and they don't break when you drop them. There's not a single premium smartphone that could do that specific job, even if it were free.
      Hazydave
  • XXXX?

    The end of the dying Nokia. This is crap.
    heldemanpieter
    • Yet, there are a lot of Android crap phones out there, and they are the

      biggest selling in the Android smartphone space.

      Nokia is targeting the same low end market as the rest of the Android crap is aiming at.
      adornoe