Digital motors, software, and the rise of the internet of things

Digital motors, software, and the rise of the internet of things

Summary: Software gets everywhere, even into the motors that drive vacuum cleaners, fans and hand dryers.

SHARE:

There are many technologies that underpin modern society, from the internal combustion engine to the microprocessor. But there's one that looks set to become even more important: the electric motor.

With the Tesla S making the electric car a visible alternative, and an electric plane completing a transcontinental flight for the first time, the humble electric motor is making a play for the big leagues again. And software is playing a key role.

WP_20130308_003
A selection of Dyson digital motors (including a prototype control board) alongside a traditional electric motor.

It's not just the visible motors, of course. Electric motors are everywhere, and in everything. Powerful and efficient, they're able to deliver torque where and when we need it. But there's one downside: they're often bulky, and the carbon brushes used to switch between the coils of the motor's rotor erode away, leaving a fine dust. They also need to be kept cool.

I've always been fascinated by electric motors, and I recently had the opportunity to meet with Dyson to take a look at the latest version of their motor design — one they say is a significant improvement over the traditional electric motor. It's certainly compact, about half the size of an equivalent traditional motor. The design has been around a while, but it's now in nearly every device Dyson makes, and the company has set up a factory just to make motors.

30-07-2013 12-28-19
Dyson's switched reluctance motor

Dyson's 'digital' motor is what’s known as a switched reluctance motor. Instead of powering the rotor, a switched reluctance motor has a magnetic core — so as power is switched through the coils of the stator the magnetic core is dragged around to line up with the magnetic field they generate. With more coils than magnetic poles on the rotor it's possible to set up a switching pattern in the coils that pulls the rotor around. That means using sensors and complex switching circuitry, as controlling the magnetic fields in the motor is the key to delivering an efficient motor.

Switched reluctance motors like this can be very efficient, and Dyson claim that their motor is 84 percent efficient (compared to 40 percent for a traditional electric motor). There’s a lot to be said for a compact, high power, motor like this — not just for vacuum cleaners and hand driers. It also meant using a lot of design tools — much of it using Dyson's own simulation software.

The rotor in Dyson’s motor is relatively simple — with just two poles. That simplifies the control problem, and reduces the number of windings needed to create the pattern of field pulses used to pull the rotor round, here at over 100,000 rpm. Normally the magnets in a switched reluctance motor are quite weak. That's not the case with Dyson's motor, where we’ve ended up using an early model’s rotor as a fridge magnet.

WP_20130730_003
The magnetic rotor from one of Dyson's motors. We use this one as a fridge magnet.

More powerful magnets means a more complex control problem, but also lets Dyson make the motors much smaller and lighter. That’s where the digital comes in, as solving that problem has meant using an off-the-shelf microcontroller and writing software, rather than developing specific control circuitry. Using a simple Hall effect magnetic sensor to determine where the rotor is, the control software makes moe than 3,000 adjustments to the magnetic field pattern every second.

Getting software into a motor like this is key to making it economically. Designing your own control hardware is expensive, and if you're trying to develop a general purpose motor, taking a software route adds flexibility — as you can modify the code to take into account different loads and usage models. That means the same control module will work in a vacuum cleaner, in a hand dryer, and in a fan. You can also take advantage of modern control theory, which focuses on keeping systems inside boundary conditions, rather than implementing a closed loop classical control model — which could easily become unstable.

If the new design of motor is so good, that out to show through in the products that use it, like the Hot+Cool fan. We've been testing this since the bitterly cold snap that hit the UK in February and March this year, and in the recent heatwave. It uses the motor to suck in air through the base and push it out through a 2.5mm gap that runs all round the oval loop at the top. That means no fan blades to get dirty and rattle (or trap your fingers or the cats tail if they get too close).

The sound of the motor is both quieter and is more regular than the beat interference you can hear with a fan blade going round, and it's a far more efficient and continuous flow — which means you rarely need to run it on high, keeping things quieter still. It's quiet enough to leave on during a conference call and at low speeds it's quiet enough that you can forget the fan is on — apart from it keeping you comfortably warm or cool.

If you run a server in a small office, you can get away without air conditioning and if you're working from home in the winter you can run the Hot+Cool in one room rather than putting the heating on in the whole house all day.

The same new motor is in the latest model of the handheld Dyson vacuum, the DC44, which has a similar combination of efficiency and smart design. On hard floors, it's hard to pick up fine dust; static electricity builds up as you walk around and keeps the dust clinging to the floor. The brush bar on the DC44 has carbon fibre filaments; they're not only touch enough to last several years, they also discharge the static so more dust gets sucked up.

The Dyson handhelds have battery lifecycles we'd love to see in notebooks as well. We've been using the original Dyson Root handheld since it came onto the market in the late 90s and even our original model still charges up and holds a charge for a good ten minutes of cleaning. Compare that to laptop batteries that lose a few percent of their charging capacity every year and you can tell Dyson really does do good engineering.

Dyson’s digital motor is another example of the importance of software, and of digital controllers. As we move into the future of the Internet of Things, it’s controllers like this that are going to provide information that improves the design of hardware and of control software. It's easy to imagine a future version of such motors that sends data back to a cloud service that can detect the early stages of failures, or that can send back optimised control routines based on your device usage.

It's a brave new world indeed when traditional electrical engineering turns into software.

Topics: Tapping M2M: The Internet of Things, Hardware

Simon Bisson

About Simon Bisson

Simon Bisson is a freelance technology journalist. He specialises in architecture and enterprise IT. He ran one of the UK's first national ISPs and moved to writing around the time of the collapse of the first dotcom boom. He still writes code.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

2 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Tesla, the dude that proved being innovative did not make one rich

    He died rather poor, and that aspect of the "people need to innovate and will make it as a result" meme people push out becomes moot as a result.

    And "internet of things" - really, the marketer class of humans couldn't think of a proper name to encompass the paradigm? Well, along with "M2M" it's clear they're either reveling in double entendre or fizzling out of innovation, but there's no money in that... at least for the non-CEO and non-stockowner classes of people...
    HypnoToad72
  • Not so brave at all...

    Find a Technics direct drive turntable from the 70s through the early 2000s. They had long ago mounted the coils down and made the magnet turn instead. What Dyson (and others) have done is figured out how to generate the pulsating magnetic field from a switching power supply, used that to set a switching frequency (both are the "digital" part) and then used powerful enough coils and a powerful magnet to get suitable torque out of the things. And even Technics wasn't behind in the torque department for the function intended. You wouldn't drive a car with the motor from an SL1200, but the startup and stopping torque (yes, they were already doing electronic braking and such too) was wonderful for DJs and audiophiles.

    And unlike a lot of Dyson's products where that is intended, in this case only the music sucked (sometimes).
    jwspicer