HTC's Windows Phone 8 devices: An initial pleasant surprise
Summary: The newly unveiled HTC Windows Phone 8X and 8S look and feel nice -- for the few minutes of very locked-down play any of us have had with them.
I admit I went into HTC's Windows Phone 8 launch on September 19 not expecting a whole lot. I say this as a HTC Trophy user who opted for this same-old, same-old phone because it was -- and still is a year-plus after I bought it -- the only Windows Phone on Verizon.
I came away pleasantly surprised and interested in getting a real hands-on with the HTC Windows Phone 8X and 8s, both of which are slated to be available in November on Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile here in the U.S.
No one has gotten an actual hands-on in the real sense with any of the Windows Phone 8 devices announced and shown to date, including the Samsung ATIV S, the Lumia 920 and 820 and/or the HTC 8X/8X. There have been some "reviews" and "hands on" videos around the Web. But no reporters or bloggers have gotten to do any real testing of any of these phones, as Microsoft is restricting the handset makers because they are hoping to have something unannounced to still announce on October 29, which is the official Windows Phone 8 "launch"
At today's HTC-reveal event, phones were locked, so we couldn't even scroll on them. But we did get to hold them and listen to music on them. At the recent Nokia Lumia Windows Phone 8 announcement, I wasn't allowed to hold a phone. I only was permitted to feel the weight of the Lumia 920 when a Nokia employee placed a locked phone on my outstretched hand. Not kidding....

The new HTC Windows Phone 8 phones are thin (see image, courtesy of WinSuperSite's Paul Thurrott, above). That is a shot -- with me as "hand model" -- of the Lumia 900 and the new HTC 8X -- stacked side-by-side. Like the Nokia Lumias, they are colorful -- red, blue, white, gray, orange, yellow, black and a couple of four different two-toned models thrown in for good measure. Because Beats audio is integrated into the phones, they have great audio. The HTC 8X will have a front- and rear-facing camera both; the 8S, a rear-facing camera only. But the 8S will have support for a removable microSD, while the 8X will not. If you want the spec list for the two new HTC Windows Phones, my ZDNet colleague Matthew Miller has a good list.
So the look and feel of the HTC 8X and 8S was a pleasant surprise. But the positioning of these phones was even more surprising.
Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer made a guest appearance at the HTC launch today, just like he did at the recent Lumia Windows Phone 8 unveiling. But at the HTC event, Ballmer and the HTC execs both played up the "we" factor, citing Microsoft's influence on the development of the new phones. They also said the new HTC phones would be the "signature" Windows Phone 8 devices, and that HTC and Microsoft would work together on a massive integrated marketing and promotion campaign.
Here's a screen shot, supplied by @Brano_H from the HTC Elevate site that proclaims the HTC phones are the "first Signature Windows Phones" (implying more Signature phones may be coming... maybe?).

Maybe this was just talk to make HTC -- one of the four five remaining Windows Phone handset makers (along with Nokia, Samsung, Huawei and ZTE) -- feel like it's on par with Microsoft's premiere Windows Phone partner, Nokia. Or maybe it signifies HTC is getting more Microsoft love than any of the other three these days? I asked Microsoft to explain the significance of "signature," but haven't received any word back.
I don't care who Microsoft's favorite Windows Phone dance partner is these days. I will say I am relieved that as a Verizon user I will finally have more than one Windows Phone to choose this fall.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Read an old article that
Your crazy is showing...
Firewall?
What researchers?
Good for you unless...
You have been on network for decades and yet you think all the viruses are detectable?
There are something called stealth malwares rootkits backdoors etc. You won't even know if its there on your computer or network. Not even with the help of the best anti virus applications.
And now the above guy told about an unprotected system. And I believe its true in the case of unprotected system, they are soo easy. And as a matter of fact there is a vulnerability on Internet Explorer 7,8 & 9 by which an attacker can compromise your system as of NOW for which there is no fix released yet! And guess what, this is not the first time it happened! And still if you think windows is all you need, you better think again mate!
Really, this is a WP article......
That's a blatant and false assumption
Don't be ignorant though of the many many many exploits and vulnerabilities of Windows in general, lest you actually believe they hype it's all the same and try to run a Windows computer on the Internet with no AV, and mistake stealthier for safety. It's funny, some Windows viruses actually patch Windows vulnerabilities to protect the system from other malware. When viruses have to install their own anti-virus, it's pretty bad...
Really.....
So for flash back.
Well OSX users are in the same boat now.....
Typical iSheep BAAAA!
But it it also true for Linux, Unix and OSX dud
Nope.
Unfortunately Windows won't work UNLESS you run services...
Dude...
Pays to be informed!
Windows 8 Comes with IE 10. So, what's your point? The article is talking about WP 8.
I think your pants may be on fire.
On the network and exposed to the internet are two different things
For example, the FBI had malware proxying people's internet activity through servers they seized and adjusted to keep users happily browsing along while they let people know. For years hundreds of thousands of PC users had no clue all their internet activity was being monitored by malware and/or fbi systems. I'm not picking on PCs. Microsoft helped lead the takedown and it was said it involved Windows and Mac computers, but I did not see a distribution... OSX and Linux have holes too that are constantly patched, but windows has been a special kind of vulnerable for years. Usually it's the cockiness and arrogance of Mac and Linux users that leads them to trouble, but they generally do stay cleaner with no AV than Windows given the same activities. Not all Windows infections (or Mac) are obvious.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/254279/fbi_steps_up_internet_doomsday_awareness_malware_campaign.html
Agree - but
It was a completely over the top comment.
but drunkenscholar I have not had the same decades of windows being virus free, and neither have the people I know, so you are lucky.
Unprotected.
Don't feed the trolls
drunkerscholar isn't so drunk