On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 5 of 24:
Next »
« Previous
Binary incompatibility?


/What/ binary incompatibility? I've got the same binaries running on RHEL 3.0, RH7.2, RH7.3, Mandrake 9.0, SuSE 9.0, and unnumbered Gentoo flavors. They all work fine.

The only "binary incompatibility" we've seen so far is between Red Hat versions, where some vendor actually writes tests for Red Hat versioning into wrapper scripts. Since the wrapper scripts are plain ASCII, we just either:
a) Edit them out, or
b) set the environment variables that "fake them out" to let the tool run -- which it then does without complaint.

The net conclusion is that any incompatibility is deliberately introduced, not by Red Hat, but by the third-party vendors.

If Sun thinks that those third-party vendors will start writing to lock out Red Hat instead of Sun, I want some of what Schwartz is smoking. The vendors I know (electronic-design automation) have been developing on Linux for years and then porting to Sun -- this, even when Sun was the dominant customer platform.

The noise about vendor incompatibility is the same as we saw back in the early 80s over "true IBM PCs" -- people got over it once they figured out that the platform was a commodity. There's no more magic to running on Red Hat (vs. SuSE) than there is to running on a Dell (vs. HP).

Customers may not need access to source code (althouth it certainly helps at three in the morning) but third-party developers certainly do. That's why Linux replaced Sun as the preferred development platform. At this point, the best Sun can hope for is to be included along with RHEL, since the binaries should work equally with both.
Posted by: Yagotta B. Kidding   Posted on: 06/10/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Lock-in under a new guise  sujai.nath@... | 06/10/04
Good article...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/10/04
Non Sequitur  Yagotta B. Kidding | 06/10/04
Interesting Analysis  Peter Komisar | 06/10/04
Binary incompatibility?  Yagotta B. Kidding | 06/10/04
formatting  toadlife | 06/10/04
Links work happy  toadlife | 06/10/04
Test  P. Douglas | 06/11/04
Thanks! (NT)  P. Douglas | 06/11/04
Well...  P. Douglas | 06/11/04
correction  toadlife | 06/11/04
T  Linux User 147560 | 06/13/04
Great artical. And we really do need binary compatibility.  DonnieBoy | 06/10/04
Here I have to  Linux User 147560 | 06/13/04
Binary compatability only in a monopoly  Knorthern Knight | 06/10/04
Binary compatability on the same architecture IS important.  DonnieBoy | 06/10/04
Support is sometimes hard to get  amrs | 06/11/04
Reality Bites. wink  CDarklock | 06/11/04
Companies like Sun are not going away  toadlife | 06/11/04
I know what you mean.  computer_man | 06/14/04
Message has been deleted.  myfevertoy | 10/22/06
The Open Source Boogeyman  CDarklock | 06/11/04
Gee you must be right  Richard Flude | 06/12/04
How about up2date source  tgr4ripe | 06/11/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline