If tech stocks were Oscar-nominated films…

If tech stocks were Oscar-nominated films…

Summary: Here's a tongue-in-cheek look at the similarities and quirks shared by some of this year's crop of Academy Award-nominated films and a handful of top-tier tech stocks and their leaders.

SHARE:

 |  Image 1 of 7

  • Thumbnail 1
  • Thumbnail 2
  • Thumbnail 3
  • Thumbnail 4
  • Thumbnail 5
  • Thumbnail 6
  • Thumbnail 7
  • The envelopes, please

    This week, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences unveiled the nominees for the 86thAcademy Awards. And it occurred to us that unlike most other industries, the tech sector and its media, for whatever reason, has a long and storied history of "celebritizing" many of its most influential CEOs and pundits.

    We know a lot about tech CEOs, especially compared to chieftains from other industries.

    After all, we don't know if Mike Duke is into cupcakes or whether or not Inge Thulin is an avid sailor, right? Most people probably wouldn't be able to pick David Lesar out of a lineup of five middle-aged white guys – even if you spotted them four guesses. Zuckerberg? Ballmer? Mayer? These are household faces and backstories.

    In this light, perhaps it makes perfect sense that the daughter of one of the most famous and impactful icons in the tech industry would play a key role in getting some of this year's most decorated films made.

    We didn't have time or space to include all the "Best Picture" nominees, but feel free to add your own in the comments section.

    The envelopes, please:

  • American Hustle

    CGI Group (NYSE: GIB) gets the nod. The parent company of the contractor, CGI Federal, responsible for butchering the rollout of the Obamacare enrollment website, Healthcare.gov, definitely earned this nomination.

    It's almost impossible to overstate just how big of a dud this one was. The website was an epic fail from jump street as millions of Americans were either unable to register for health care benefits at all or forced to suffer through ridiculous delays and interruptions that kept total enrollment figures at embarrassingly low rates for months.

    Even after all the outrage and legacy-damaging press, the site is still riddled with security holes and pathetic shortcomings such as links for the Spanish version that take users to an English-language form.

    It's the kind of debacle that can forever taint a president's legacy. If the good news is that Accenture will take the reins once the CGI contract expires at the end of February, the bad news is that it's going to cost millions more to right the ship – at least $90 million more for the next year alone.

    Worse, it's still unclear just how much this Hindenburg-like disaster has cost so far. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, no David O. Russell to be sure, told Congress her agency spent $319 million on the website through the end of October and has allocated a total of $677 million and counting.

Topics: After Hours, Tech Industry

About

Larry Barrett is a freelance journalist and blogger who has covered the information technology and business sectors for more than 15 years.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

5 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • What the hell is wrong with ZDNet?

    Why do they get soooo many spam messages posted to their blogs. They are so easy to identify and remove. Guess they have employed only Microsoft stooges who simply have the capability to point and click and can not think at all for themselves. Sad really.
    DontUseMicrosoftAtAll
    • Well Troll, I'll tell ya...

      If you idiots didn't waste so much time "flagging" posts that you disagree with and concentrated on the spam, perhaps myself and the other volunteer moderators (that's right, troll...volunteer, we do not get paid!) would not have to wade through 115,000 flagged messages to find those that are spam!
      Think about that the next time you flag someones post that isn't spam, but is just a different point of view.
      Wizard57M
      ZDNet Moderator
      wizard57m-cnet
      • Fantastic.

        Best response. Keep up the good work, Wiz. Not all of us on here are rude pricks and rest assured, we appreciate your time and effort.
        (Admittedly the smart-arse in me was tempted to flag your post but I resisted haha)
        bren0
        • Thanks breno...

          don't know if it's "good work", but it can take a bit of time. The flagged message queue gets quite large at times, especially when the various factions commence to bickering. Technology is technology...use what you have and what works for YOU, not something to please some group of fans somewhere!
          As for flagging my comments, LOL...you wouldn't be the first, nor the last I wager! I'm used to it...it's sort of funny, in a twisted sort of way, to be alerted to a "spam" message that is one you posted yourself, hehe!
          wizard57m-cnet
    • I see your corporate masters sent you new trolls to post

      Why do they get soooo many spam messages posted to their blogs. They are so easy to identify and remove. Guess they have employed only stooges like DontUseMicrosoftAtAll who simply have the capability to point and click and can not think at all for themselves.

      Sad really, but not surprising.

      Desperate companies will hire desperate people like DontUseMicrosoftAtAll.
      William.Farrel