iiNet quits Conroy's filter trial
Summary: iiNet has decided to withdraw its application to participate in the Federal Government's internet filtering trial.
iiNet has decided to withdraw its application to participate in the Federal Government's internet filtering trial.

Michael Malone (Credit: iiNet)
iiNet's managing director Michael Malone said that despite drawn-out negotiations with the department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, it was obvious no agreement could be reached.
Malone stated that the recent media storm around the leaked blacklist of URLs similar to the ACMA blacklist was part of the reason iiNet had decided to withdraw, along with the policy which was always changing and "confused" explanations of the trial's purpose.
"It became increasingly clear that the trial was not simply about restricting child pornography or other such illegal material, but a much wider range of issues including what the government simply describes as 'unwanted material' without an explanation of what that includes," Malone said in a statement.
Malone said that although everyone was against child pornography, the filtering trial would not help keep it away from Australian internet users.
"In reality, the vast majority of online child pornography activity does not appear on public websites but is distributed over peer-to-peer networks which are not and cannot be captured by this trial or policy."
He wanted the government to rethink its approach and make clear what it intended in terms of internet censorship.
"This lack of communication from government and bureaucracy is rightly seen as underhand and unsavoury and is now attracting international dismay as well as Australian disgust," Malone said.
iiNet was negotiating to be in the second round of filtering trial participants. Communications Minister Stephen Conroy recently said that some of his reasoning for choosing the six starting ISPs was that they had said the trial could be done with zero costs. Optus has also been talking to the government about participating in the trial.
A spokesperson for the telco said that despite iiNet's withdrawal, Optus intended to continue its negotiations with the government concerning its participation in the trial.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
YAY Michael
ISP level filtering is not going to solve anything.
And until there is transparency about the objective criteria being used to determine what web sites are blocked and a more equitable dialogue -- we're not going to come up with workable solutions.
iiNet's Withdrawal
Another issue (sorry, a bit off topic) is what the ACCC thinks of the ACMA's processes for managing the list. If a commercial website can be hacked and have some obscene photos put on it resulting it it being blacklisted with no notice or appeal, then your's competitors have a very effective tool for putting you out of business. Of course, it is unlikely to happen to the big end of town or government web sites (the ACMA would probably send a polite note about the offending material and request for it to be removed), but small business could easily be wiped off the map without any recourse. This could make for an interesting case - the ACCC taking the ACMA to court for anti-competitive behaviour :-)
Internet filter
Partly correct
iiNet quits Conroy's filter trial
Just saved 1 customer
Anyone who researches this topic knows this filter can't work and will just waste money.
Great!
/sarcasm
Regarding Optus
Politicians Trustworthy?
So given the possibility of using internet filtering for things the population would not even consider acceptable to achieve their own ends, they will.
We all should be saying NO! in no uncertain terms. Politicians are simply not that trustworthy.
Conroy on Q & A
Yes, Minister
I suppose this falls apart if you invent a problem that doesn't exist or grossly exaggerate a problem that is very small-scale, put in place something that is going to be a complete disaster, inflame people to the point where the actively seek to undermine the initiative, and have your detractors' claims (e.g. the list will leak) proven true.
Second the Yay
Partly Partly Correct
The Black list would be "controlled" by ACMA but each household would be allowed to turn on or off the filter. This is the same policy that the ALP took to the election, but then did a Peter "When we get in we'll change it all" Garratt...
Thank god for SSH!
No difference