Microsoft, Motorola ruling: Google patents not worth billions
Summary: A judge found in favor of Microsoft in a patent spat with Motorola, indicating that Google grossly overpaid for the smartphone maker, despite the patent protection it was given.

A U.S. judge fell in favor of Microsoft in the first round of an ongoing spat against Motorola over how much the software giant should pay the Google division for patent use.
But the case was more than twofold: the ultimate cost that Microsoft must pay for the patents would lead to an estimate valuation of Motorola's patent cache, which could have drastic effects on how the company makes deals with rivals and competitors in the future.
The case centers around how much Microsoft should pay the search giant's mobile division for licensing its H.264 video and networking "essential" patents, aptly named because they are necessary to the functioning of its Xbox console and Windows software.
In the ruling, U.S. District Judge James Robart in Seattle said Microsoft owed about $1.8 million, a slightly higher figure than Microsoft's offering price of $1 million a year.
Google-owned Motorola, on the other hand, argued that it should be paid a massive $4 billion a year for use of these devices, as a result of the revenue and profit generated by both Xbox and Windows.
While Motorola believed that it licensed its patents on a reasonable basis "consistent with those set by others in the industry," reports AllThingsD, Microsoft welcomed the decision saying it was "good for consumers," as it allowed patents essential to innovation remain affordable.
The string of judgements falling against Motorola seems to suggest Google grossly overpaid for the company, despite the patent protection it was given.
The valuation of Motorola's patents remains undefined, but significantly lower than Google expected.
For the search turned mobile giant, it's a huge blow. It puts the company that Google bought for $12.5 billion — which has since increased to about $13 billion with restructuring costs and suchlike — worth a lot less than what it shelled out for back in 2011.
Google's Eric Schmidt said Motorola was "not all about the patents," but it bolstered Google's position in the wake of competition, notably from Apple, which had brought a slew of patent-related cases against its manufacturing partners. All the patent fights were ultimately aimed at knocking Android down a peg or two.
But it almost was all about the patents. In total, Google acquired 17,000 patents in total, worth roughly $12.5 billion — not including staff, acquisition costs and other things. Call it $12 billion or even $11 billion, the difference between Motorola's asking price of $4 billion down to the court's $1.8 million determination values Motorola far less than Google expected.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
Still making cash
I think they made more money off royalty fees than Windows Phone
If you think Mario`s story is nice,
Patent trolling underlines that our generation...
Your mum is a patent troll.
Windows Phone 8 was the only
I would imagine Microsofts goal with the licensing fee for Android
That is just speculation though.
In Microsoft patent spat, ruling hints that Google grossly overpaid for Mot
Awww...
I wonder when the $10B goodwill writedown will come. That's gotta hurt.
Bahahaha
Google = thief.
OwlllllNet: "12 billion down the drain...."
aQuantive: $6.2 billion U.S
That's roughly $12 billion U.S.
Rabid Google Monkey
Stay on topic.
Google didn't steal Motorola Mobility (as OwlllllNet stated)
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-20092362-94/google-to-buy-motorola-mobility-for-$12.5b/
Even if they did pay "a 63 percent premium over the company's closing stock price". Note that the date of the above-linked CNET article is August 15, 2011. Thus, some here didn't need a judge to tell us that Google's acquisition cost of Motorola Mobility was a gross overpayment.
Likewise, we didn't need reminded....
I would not be unhappy if the Ballmer era ended. I wish it would.
BS
What was the point of moto spending all the money to develop these things, if the courts just give them away.
IF M$ paid them fees comparable to those they charged the Android manu's...
Oh, and Love_ock is nothing more than a M$ sound bite.
Cell phones
Motrola made a voluntary FRAND promise
Motorola voluntarily gave that promise and thus they found it still worth the development investment at that time (before 2003). Only after going into negatiations with google about the takeover of Motorola they changed their mind on their FRAND promise and tried to get a ridiculous amount of money.
Now they are losing courtcase after courtcase and have two formal investigations by the EU which might cost them hundreds of millions in fines.
And are you an anti-MS soundbite, timspublic1@...?
This is similar to you leasing a building, then having the company raise that rate to 1000% because they made a bad choice someplace else, and is trying to milk you to cover their loses on some other failed purcahse.
??
This is not about a large patent portfolio
So they tried to charge 4 billion a year for partial rights to use a standardized video format.