Is it too late to privatize MTNL and BSNL?

Is it too late to privatize MTNL and BSNL?

Summary: Both state-run telcos were created to increase teledensity in urban and rural India, but with this aim achieved and bottomlines plummeting, the government will find it tough to revive the two entities.


Last month, India's communications minister Kapil Sibal wrote to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh asking for the formation of a special committee to look into the revival of state-run telcos Bharat Sanchar Nigam (BSNL) and Mahanagar Telephone Nigam (MTNL).

In the letter, Sibal drew Singh's attention to his expectation that MTNL's net worth may be completely eroded in 2013-14 while BSNL is likely to post a loss of around INR 100 billion (US$1.86 billion) in the 2012-13 fiscal year. The government has convened a group of ministers to recommend possible measures for the revival of the two state-controlled telecom companies.

In fact, MTNL has asked consultant Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu to recommend ways in which its fortunes can be revived. According to news reports, Deloitte has been asked to submit a report of recommendations by July 2013, which will be taken up by an internal committee comprising of Department of Telecommunications (DoT) officials and MTNL executives.

Over a decade back, when the Indian government was in a privatization overdrive, there was a lot of talk of privatizing BSNL and MTNL. Sometime around the end of 2002, the government decided that both MTNL and BSNL would not be sold off to the private sector.

Around that time, MTNL had been given the Navratna, or "nine jewels", status by the Indian government. Navratna was the title given by the Indian government to public sector undertakings (PSUs) that have comparative advantages, giving them greater autonomy to compete in the global market so that they could emerge as global giants. To retain the coveted Navratna status, the PSU has to be a profit-making company. In case it makes losses for two consecutive years, the company loses its Navratna tag.

MTNL, which operates in Delhi and Mumbai, has been reporting losses since 2009. The telco lost its Navratna status after posting losses for more than two consecutive years. Specifically, it had posted a loss of INR 26.1 billion (US$484 million) for fiscal year 2009-10, INR 28 billion (US$520 million) for 2010-11, and INR 41 billion (US$760 million) for 2011-12.

In January 2013, MTNL hired property consultants DTZ and Feedback Infrastructure Services to help it monetize some 780,000 square feet of office space and land in Mumbai and Delhi.

As for BSNL, another report said it is expected to lay off its employees by offering voluntary retirement.

If the government bails out MTNL and BSNL, the private players are likely to cry foul. Several private players are heavily in debt and their margins have been under pressure for quite sometime now.

Kamlesh Bhatia, research director at Gartner, is of the view that market forces have done their job and communication has been made available to a vast majority of people in the country. Therefore, the two telecom companies need not be government-owned.

"Today, the role of BSNL and MTNL is diluted," Bhatia said, adding the government needs to now change their role. "There is need for development around communication infrastructure," he added.

Privatization leads to both innovation and increase in efficiency. But is today a good time to privatize MTNL and BSNL? The industry is very different from what it was a decade ago. The industry is facing several challenges such as falling average revenue per user (ARPU), fierce competition, rising debts, drooping profits and low investor interest. There is every possibility that the two PSU may go for a song, if the government decides to privatize it in the near future.

"The government needs to take a broader view. It needs to promote innovation in the telecom industry," Bhatia said. According to him, privatization is still an option for the government.

It would be interesting to see what Deloitte recommends in its report.

Topics: Government, Mobility, Networking, Telcos, India

Swati Prasad

About Swati Prasad

Swati Prasad is a New Delhi-based freelance journalist who spent much of the mid-1990s and 2000s covering brick-and-mortar industries for some of India's leading publications. Seven years back when she took to freelancing, India was at the peak of its "outsourcing hub" glory and the world of Indian IT, telecom and Internet fascinated her. A self-proclaimed technophobic, Swati loves to report on anything that's remotely alien to her--be it cloud computing, telecom, BPOs, social media, e-government or software and hardware, and also how high-tech sectors impact the Indian economy.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Not in favor of privatization

    Of all the telecoms out there, only BSNL (and probably MTNL too) has cheap rates for calls, sms and data/3g. I believe privatisation would be a negative as it won't be in government's control anymore and the private companies can charge exorbitantly. Consumers will be at loss.
  • Why Privatization!!

    Why dont Govt. look for a better way and figure out how these state-run subsidiaries can gain in business without implementing the privatization?
  • no need of privatization

    there are many way a company can regrow.
    bsnl has occupied great area in india.
    bsnl is the best
    it can revive

    As per news roaming now a days like
    1. MTNL & BSNL going to merge.
    2. May be govt also buyback share of MTNL whereas BSNL lot listed as of now.
    4. what happens when govt buy back share of any PSU then their stock will go up or down. or is a good move for company
    3. MTNL sell 50% share to BSNL.
    4. Govt also thinking to give debt relief package to MTNL
    So conclusion to ask above is that i want to buy share of MTNL. Is it good to buy stock for next 1 or 2 years. What i am thinking that if everything goes smoothly MTNL stock will go around 300/- per share in next 1 year. Is i m right or wrong