Intel leads tech industry in crusade to eliminate conflict minerals

Intel leads tech industry in crusade to eliminate conflict minerals

Summary: Four high-tech companies have established well-defined programs for cutting out tin, tungsten, tantalum and gold that could potentially be funding militia groups in the Congo. But other companies are behind.

SHARE:
TOPICS: Emerging Tech
3

Sometimes high-tech companies do what they say they are going to do. Intel, which has pledged to eliminate all minerals potentially sourced from "conflict" zones in the Congo from its microprocessors by the end of 2013, leads the list of technology companies that have made progress on this goal, reports the Enough Project.

Intel, Hewlett-Packard, Motorola Solutions and Apple have all established policies that focus on removing so-called conflict minerals including tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold, according to the organization's report, "Taking Conflict Out of Consumer Gadgets: Company Rankings on Conflict Minerals 2012."

Six other companies have taken steps toward establishing broader policies: SanDisk, Philips, Sony, Panasonic, RIM and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD).

But game technology company Nintendo gets called out for the opposite reason: it hasn't done anything about this yet, at least not publicly.

"HP and Intel have gone above and beyond the call of duty on conflict minerals," says Sash Lezhnev, an Enough Project analyst who co-authored the report. "It is now time to level the playing field for all companies, and the Securities and Exchange Commission has a key role to play in its upcoming vote on the rules for the conflict minerals law on August 22."

The Dodd-Frank act requires publicly traded companies to disclose sourcing of conflict minerals in their reporting; declaring whether their products contain components related to mines in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) or certain neighboring countries in Central Africa. Those minerals are often used to fund armed guerilla groups in the area, just like conflict diamonds.

The SEC is expected to make the requirements clearly after its discussion next week.

For the complete picture, see the infographic below:

2012 Electronics Company Rankings Chart

 (Chart and image courtesy of the Enough Project)

Topic: Emerging Tech

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

3 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Stick it to 'em

    In other news, residents of New York City are asked not to purchase items from bodegas in Harlem. These stores are often robbed by armed hoodlums, and store proceeds end up in the hands of violent criminals. Mayor Bloomberg will be making a list and checking it twice.
    Robert Hahn
  • Honestly

    Honestly, even though I comprehend all that, I won't change my buying choices.
    Some parts of the world that I have visited while in the military were good and some bad. That is just how it is. It is great that those companies have the power to possibly make a real difference but I have to choose by price, quality and availability.
    Kudos to them but I won't be changing my choices.
    MoeFugger
  • what bafflegab

    pledged to eliminate all minerals potentially sourced from "conflict" zones

    So if a mineral is mined in a conflict zone, they won't use the mineral at all. What absolute BS.

    They've made their announcement, everyone feels good, in 6 months they will go back to business as usual, because the replacement materials will be twice as expensive.

    I notice Apple is on the list. They didn't make it a year after they announced the "fair labor" (or what ever they called it) practice that they had more suicides. The same thing will happen with this initiative.
    Ron_007