iPad Air 2 features that are coming your way

iPad Air 2 features that are coming your way

Summary: When is the updated, 6th-generation version of Apple's flagship tablet coming? All signs point to October or November of 2014. But the real question is not when the product is going to be released, it's what's going to be in it.

SHARE:
TOPICS: Tablets, Apple, iPad
119

 |  Image 2 of 8

  • iPad Air 2

    The iPad Air 2. It's only a year away.

    The iPad Air has only just been released, but the rumor mill is already spinning as to what might be in the next-generation version, which is likely to appear in October or November of 2014. Let's have a look at the technologies and features that might make their way into the next version of the product.

    Read more about what features could appear in the iPad Air 2 here.

  • Industrial Design:More of the same

    The iPad Air got a complete design overhaul, mimicking the appearance of the iPad mini by reducing the width of the bezel and dropping a lot of weight by simplifying components in the build. 

    Expect the next-generation iPad Air as well as the mini with Retina Display to look a lot like the current one, but next year we're likely to get the Touch ID sensor from the iPhone 5s.

  • Display: SHARP IGZO Retina

    The iPad Air 2 is likely to have the exact (or nearly the same) display resolution as the iPad Air, the New iPad and iPad 3 that preceded it, at around 2560x1536 pixels.

    However, the important changes in this display are going to occur in switching to a different display manufacturing process, referred to as Indium Gallium Zinc Oxide, or IGZO, for short.

    IGZO technology was developed by Japanese electronics giant SHARP along with Semiconductor Energy Laboratories. The zinc oxide replaces the silicon used in the amorphous layer in existing TFT displays and has a number of advantages, including a vast increase in electron mobility (over 40 times that of amorphous silicon) resulting in a higher reaction speed over previous technologies.

    Moving to IGZO also would mean an even thinner sandwich for the LCD panel and also translating into less weight, as well as improved luminosity and increased power efficiency.

    Why do we think Apple is going to IGZO? Because SHARP has announced that as of April of 2012, it would be producing 10" 2560x1600 and 7" 1280x800 IGZO panels in large quantities.

    So it would seem iPad Air and iPad mini with Retina Display are both (eventually) getting an IGZO boost.

  • Thumbnail 1
  • Thumbnail 2
  • Thumbnail 3
  • Thumbnail 4
  • Thumbnail 5
  • Thumbnail 6
  • Thumbnail 7
  • Thumbnail 8

Topics: Tablets, Apple, iPad

About

Jason Perlow, Sr. Technology Editor at ZDNet, is a technologist with over two decades of experience integrating large heterogeneous multi-vendor computing environments in Fortune 500 companies. Jason is currently a Partner Technology Strategist with Microsoft Corp. His expressed views do not necessarily represent those of his employer.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Related Stories

Talkback

119 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Apple's improvement mantra - Lighter, Thinner and more Powerful; same cost.

    I can't argue with your crystal ball gazing but, IMO, it is a VERY safe prediction. Let's try to stretch your imagination just a tad.

    For the longest time, you have projected an OS X/iOS software and hardware merger based upon the ARM architecture.

    How's 2014, or 12 months from now, looking for the first 64 bit ARM SoC based MacBook Air with IGZO, Liquid Metal and improved battery and electronic's synergy resulting in a laptop design that is just a smidgeon thicker than the current iPad 4 and having a 12 hour battery life between charges sound?

    Or, do you want to play it safe and project this possibility becoming reality in 2015?

    Just curious.
    kenosha77a
    • Some might argue that Apple failed to follow this mantra w/the iPad 3 or 4

      I said it was a mantra, not a hard and fast observation. However, few can argue that during the past 12 years, Apple has tried to apply these design goals to their next generation products.
      kenosha77a
      • Nothing better than a Apple product

        Bar none.

        My Opinion
        Over and Out
    • Lighter, thinner, CPU that's more powerful = lower battery life

      People love these things, whose CPUs couldn't outmatch a desktop made 15 years ago, because of portability.
      HypnoToad72
      • Fifteen years ago would make it about 1998. Memory lane time

        You should get a big kick out of this. I found this web site containing some interesting factoids.

        http://www.computerhope.com/history/1998.htm

        For example. Did you recall that in 1998:

        Intel released the Celeron processor and eMachines was founded. Sorry, but I wouldn't trade my iPad 3 with it's software for any 1998 eMachine Celeron based desktop with it's software.

        Apple releases iMac and Bill Gates is hit in the face with a cream pie. I doubt the two 1998 events were related. Grin.

        Sun releases JavaStation and Windows 98 is released by Microsoft. Actually, I used both software efforts but I really enjoyed my Amiga systems during 1998. IMO, AmigaDOS incorporating a version of IBM's script language REXX called ARexx was way more advanced than those other two software systems. But I'm partial and I'm biased in my objectivity regarding this issue.

        And, not last and not least of the 1998 hit parade, Valve Half-Life is released as a FPS game. That last one was for my old online friend, NonZealot. I hope he's doing well.
        kenosha77a
        • Mac.Netbook

          The ARM architecture has no performance/power efficient over the 5 year old ATOM architecture. If Apple really want to convert their Macbook line to Mac.Netbook line, ATOM is really a better choice than ARM. At least they don't to rewrite all the software, or do the binary translation which will add a another level of hiccup on the weak ARM platform.
          wsw1982
          • Re: The ARM architecture has no performance/power efficient over the 5 year

            It most certainly IS more power-efficient. That's why Calxeda can build a business offering ARM server clusters: the biggest expense in running a data centre has become the electricity bill.
            ldo17
          • It is?

            I'm pretty sure our biggest bill is the Hardware and administrators we pay to manage it. Energy savings are nice but it's only a small piece of the pie.
            Rob.sharp
          • Apple and Convergence

            Convergence devices is the last thing on Apple's agenda.
            They won't even let you make phone calls or run passbook on an ipad.
            You can be pretty certain Apple won't make an OSX tablet/touchscreen Mac.
            They aim to have every Apple user buy the iphone/ipad/macbook trio which is why they have the triple setup in Apple stores.
            Mac sales have dropped 25%. It is becoming less relevant for Apple just like Mac Pros. It is not a growth area for Apple, and facing insurmountable hurdles to make an OSX tablet or an ARM Mac line is expending a lot of resources and expense for no potential benefit to the bottom line.
            Apple is all about the bottom line at user's expense, never the other way round.
            warboat
          • Grow up

            @warboat

            Apple already made an OSX tablet. They gave it a touch interface and gave the touch interfaced OSX the name iOS. They called the tablet iPad.

            Microsoft wasted years trying to pretend that you could just stuff WindosXP/VISTA/7 on a tablet and have a worthwhile device.

            Apple is not facing insurmountable hurdles to do the same, because it knows that it's a stupid thing to even try.

            Apple is all about giving the best possible user experience, because if you give the customers something that delights them, the bottom line will look after itself.

            Shame Microsoft never thought of that.
            Henry 3 Dogg
          • @ Henry 3 Dogg

            You forgot about Windows CE . . . and we all know how badly that went on tablets and everything else.

            MS had almost a decade headstart on Apple for tablets and smartphones and Ms completely blew-it with poor quality OSes.
            1,2,3
          • Exactly.

            Microsoft had a decade head start. If they had taken tablet and smartphone development more seriously, we all might be using Windows tablets/phones now rather than iOS and Android. They severely blew it. They figured their lack of success was due to lack of demand. They were wrong. It turns out everyone wanted tablets and smartphones. They just didn't want the poorly-designed, fat, sluggish bricks that Microsoft was pushing out. Major fail there.
            BillDem
          • I think the problem with MS tablets was tech

            At the time, it was too difficult to get the power you needed in a tablet format.
            larsonjs
          • It was/is more of

            Microsoft's misguided notion, the "One size fit's all." Apple was/is successful, because they recognized different UIs for different usage scenarios. Seriously, a mouse pointer on a phone screen? Not they want to have people "touching" every display?, or replacing a laptop, with a touchscreen Netbook. Seriously?
            I hate trolls also
          • I do use windows phones / tablets...

            And I'm sick and tired of helping people figure out how to do things on their iPads that they already know how to do on a windows tablet. It's pretty silly.
            mrefuman
          • Windows CE

            My robotic vacuum cleaner from Samsung runs on Windows CE 5.0. It definitely does not have touch interface!

            The thing is also notoriously unreliable, especially it's battery charging software (perhaps just based on Windows's "power management").

            Microsoft never understood what "OS" and "API" means...
            danbi
          • err, mac sales dropping

            Poor stat, and a blatantly false conclusion.

            Last quarters Mac sales got hammered by introducing new models with nothing in the pipeline. It wasnt until end of January/beginning of February that they have been fulfilling orders at a reasonable rate. Also add in EU silliness about the MacPro case design that mandated no more EU sales of MacPros (until a new version is released).
            Non-Euclidean
          • You may be on to something.

            I would be all for this, especially if it was in the sub-$500 range. Also it is definitely possible because I've seen at least one person on the internet put OS X on a MSi Wind netbook. Does the Air use a SSD? Because that would probably reduce its overall cost, as well.
            Richard Estes
          • WRONG: "ARM has [no efficiency benefit] over the 5 year old ATOM"

            Are you sure about that? Because the (current) Bay Trail Atom SoC (system-on-a-chip) is slower than Apple’s A7 Soc – the 64-bit one used on the iPhone 5S and the iPad Air. See, for example, the benchmarks at http://bit.ly/1dnfqEa

            If you’re talking about a five year old Atom CPU, I can guarantee that the OP or FLOPs per watt is much worse tan the current Bay Trail systems and hence much worse than an iPhone 5S

            To quote that article: "Bay Trail's performance crown lasted all of a week, and even less than that if you count when we actually ran this benchmark.”

            Interestingly, many articles have noted that the A7’s two processor cores is the ‘sweet’ number, and that four or more cores actually degrade performance per watt. See: http://bit.ly/1aJimKv and http://bit.ly/18GFMli
            StandardPerson
        • 1998 and iPad 5

          @kenosha77a
          good comments .. tempus does fugit. For those of us who bought the first "little Mac" in March 1984 (over $2,000) and then IBM 20286 in August (almost $3,000) it has been an exciting ride.

          Interesting to read and hear the complaints about HIGH prices for this terrific gear. 2012 over twice 1984 :-0

          As for non-zealot, missing him is like missing a bad tooth. Hopefully he is sucking his thumb somewhere >> else.
          n781lc