iPad mini: How much would you pay for one?
Summary: The problem with the whole concept of the iPad mini is that no matter how much you massage the bill of materials, you can't come up with a compelling price point for the device.
If the blogosphere is anything to go by, it seems that while the iPhone it too small, the iPad is also too big.
The endless speculation that Apple is planning to shrink the iPad while at the same time make the iPhone bigger continues. While I believe that there is a strong case for making the iPhone bigger, it's harder to make a compelling case for a larger iPad.
According to Patrick Moorhead, president and principal analyst of Moor Insights & Strategy, Apple needs a 7-inch tablet because without one the Cupertino-based giant face the prospect of losing market share and profit dollars.
"The Google Nexus 7 will sell well," writes Moorhead, "which is good for Google, Android, ASUS and NVIDIA, but bad for Apple, unless they act before the holidays".
The problem though, is price. "Apple may have redesigned some of the innards of the new iPad 2 as they lowered the price," writes Moorhead, "but not nearly enough to offset the $100 price reduction, so a mini-iPad would be additive, not dilutive like the $399 iPad 2".
The problem is massaging the numbers to make it work.
Take a look at the bill of materials estimate for the iPad 2 and iPad 3 drawn up in March by iSuppli Research:

Let's take the cost of a 16GB Wi-Fi iPad 2, listed as a little over $245 as a starting price for the mythical iPad mini. We can make a few common sense assumptions about any smaller iPad, for example, that it would have a smaller screen, a smaller touch screen and, one would assume, a smaller battery.
Problem is, it's hard to see this shaving much more than about $40 off the bill of materials. Let's push the numbers further by assuming that the component costs have dropped by some $20 since the original bill of materials was drawn up in March and we come up with a device that has an overall materials and manufacturing cost of around $185. This figure excludes costs associated with R&D, marketing and so on.
If the iPad mini costs around $185 to make, how much should Apple slap on the price sticker? $299 is the logical price point, pegging it at $100 cheaper than the current 16GB Wi-Fi iPad 2. On the face of it that seems like a healthy $115 above what it would cost to make.
However, scanning through the cost analysis we find that this would mean the iPad mini would have the smallest gap between the bill of materials plus manufacturing costs of any iPad.
In other words, this would mean that by releasing a 7-inch iPad Apple would be risking cannibalizing the sale of iPads with a better profit margin.
That doesn't sound like the Apple we know.
There's another problem with that $299 price point. Would the market stand a $100 price premium for the Apple logo on the back of the tablet when Amazon and Google already sell cracking tablets for $199? And what if Amazon slashes the price of the existing Kindle to $149? Where does that leave the iPad mini at $299?
In theory, a smaller and more portable iPad sounds great, but in practice, unless Apple is willing to massacre its profit margins to bring one to market, it's just not going to happen.
Image source: CNET, iSuppli Research.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
I think Jon Fortt's take was the most interesting
"Consider: To make their no-profit hw strategies work, $GOOG & $AMZN probably need $AAPL to stay out of the sub-$300 tablet mkt"
If Apple enters this market then there is little or nothing to support the "give the hardware away" strategy that both Amazon and now Google are pursuing. It could well turn out to be a blood bath.
That point was already raised in the article.
For me, it would not. I plan to buy two $159 Asus 7" Tablets. For my children. The $100 premium at this point is too much.
Whilst it's worth paying a premium when you get past the $600 mark, yes, I can accept an extra $100 so long as it's worth paying. But the premium ratio between 600/700 and 200/300 is too great to warrant the extra expenditure for what is simply a logo.
Based solely on a "bottom line" basis, your choice makes sense.
Your children
Childre also need to learn the important lessons of "why pay more?"
Frugality is a very important lesson.
Frugality is bestowing a $200 gift on kids??
It seems to me it contributes to a culture of unreasonable expectations--and of instant gratification without working for what you want.
I'd be much more concerned about teaching the work ethic.
Apologies! Haven't had my morning cereal yet, so my curmudgeon side comes out! :-)
I think Bozzer's main point-- that $100 is a much bigger premium percentage wise at the low than at the high end is well taken. A 50% premium for an Apple mini iPad ($200 to $300) will be harder to bear than a 16-20% premium when you're up in the $500-600 range.
And, adornoe knows full well that the premium for Apple products isn't just for the logo--you are getting Apple quality in design, ease of use, responsiveness, and manufacturing-- and 3rd party apps. Plus, the iPad came in at an earth-shaking $500 instead of the expected $800 starting point. Apple is clearly willing to go after market share.
In spite of these cost analyses, I'll bet a $250 price for an iPad mini 8gb device and $300 for a 16gb one.
Market share
Lessons
I own several Android tablets, do you?
Oh, and could you PLEASE learn how to properly use commas?!?
Something you never learned as a child
Based on experience
Apple simply can't go for "give the hardware away" strategy
As for Amazon, all they do is selling content and it has been very successful for them. There nothing to lose for them.
Apple on the other hand, live and die by their profit margins. It's just too much of a risk of cannibalizing other highend iPads by pricing iPad mini too low. Just look at how iPhone cannibalized iPod and iPad cannibalizing Macs over the years.
The problem for Apple is Google is offering similar UX price that is so low they're practically giving away and Apple's business simply have not prepare for that.
Big difference
Also Apple has a continued revenue stream from the iOS devices just like Google and Amazon, it's called iTunes and the App Store.
iPad mini: How much would you pay for one?
I got to admit. That was one of your better zingers.
Let 'em kill each other
If I were Apple, I would put a 7" tablet out there at the same margin as the 10" unit, even if that means the price ends up over $300. The bet is that there are people who want the additional portability, but don't want something that was designed to be sold for $199 or less.
By all accounts, Apple is currently supply-constrained on the 10" iPads, and they just started selling them in China. So selling 7-inchers won't really take away from the sale of 10" iPads, they will be incremental. So Apple can sit there at $350 or something and skim the cream while Google and Amazon beat each other over the head.
iPad mini: How much would you pay for one?
Waggoner-Edstrom strikes again
Clever
What I really want...
When asked, the user usually explains that they use the iPad for email, light web browsing and playing music or watching videos, the laptop for real work (other than email), and the phone for phone and email.
Realistically, I'm of the opinion that most folks own an iPad more as a status symbol, and don't really offload much of their real work to the device.
As an IT Professional, and I could never replace a laptop with an iPad. Just too many things it can not do or do well. I currently carry a reasonably sized laptop and a phone. That is more than enough for me.
In simpler terms, it's all about size and functionality. I can do everything I need with two devices. Why add a third (or fourth) to the mix?