Judge overturns Oracle's $1.3bn award against SAP

Judge overturns Oracle's $1.3bn award against SAP

Summary: The judge in the long-running corporate theft case between Oracle and SAP has rejected a jury award of $1.3bn, saying Oracle used 'self-serving testimony' to make its case

TOPICS: Tech Industry

A California judge has rejected a $1.3bn award that a jury offered to Oracle months ago in its corporate theft trial against SAP.

Read this

SAP to pay interest in $1.3bn Oracle case

A judge has ordered the German software company to pay interest as well as a $1.3bn fine to Oracle for the actions of its now-defunct subsidiary TomorrowNow

Read more+

On Thursday, US District Judge Phyllis Hamilton overturned the award in a long-running court battle between the two enterprise software makers. In the suit, Oracle argued that SAP's now-shuttered subsidiary TomorrowNow wrongfully and illegally downloaded millions of Oracle files.

"Rather than providing evidence of SAP's actual use of the copyrighted works and objectively verifiable number of customers lost as a result, Oracle presented evidence of the purported value of the intellectual property as a whole, elicited self-serving testimony from its executives regarding the price they claim they would have demanded in an admittedly fictional negotiation, and proffered the speculative opinion of its damages expert, which was based on little more than guesses about the parties' expectations," Hamilton wrote in the decision.

Hamilton believes the actual damages to Oracle were worth only $272m (£168m).

For more on this ZDNet UK-selected story, see Judge rejects Oracle's $1.3 billion award against SAP on ZDNet.com.

Get the latest technology news and analysis, blogs and reviews delivered directly to your inbox with ZDNet UK's newsletters.

Topic: Tech Industry

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to start the discussion