Korean and US versions of Samsung Galaxy S4 'as different as kimchee and coleslaw': IHS

Korean and US versions of Samsung Galaxy S4 'as different as kimchee and coleslaw': IHS

Summary: The Korean version of Samsung's flagship Galaxy S4 smartphone contains a powerful eight-core processor, while US users have to make do with a quad-core part. Will American owners of the S4 feel short-changed?

SHARE:

From the outside, the American and Korean versions of Samsung's new Galaxy S IV might seem identical, but peel back the case, and you'll find that they are as different as, in the words of research firm IHS, kimchee and coleslaw.

And we're not talking small differences, either; we're talking major differences that change the fabric of the entire handset, including the processor, the wireless subsystem, and even the user interface.

The differences between the two smartphones mean that they have a very different bill of materials (BOM).

The US Galaxy S4 with 16GB of NAND flash storage has a BOM of $229, rising to $237 when the manufacturing cost is added. The Korean version of the smartphone, with the exact same memory configuration, has a BOM of $244, which rises to $252 when manufacturing is added.

(Image: IHS)

"With at least four different known incarnations of the Galaxy S4, Samsung is demonstrating its strategy of offering a mobile product that has appealing features and pricing — and then adapting the device to suit the tastes of varying markets or regions," said Vincent Leung, senior analyst, teardown services, for IHS.

"This approach is in stark contrast to the one-size-fits-all philosophy used by Apple Inc, Samsung's primary competitor in the wireless space."

The most glaring difference between the two versions is the processor used.

See also: Best Android smartphones (May 2013 edition)

The US Galaxy S4 makes use of Qualcomm's Snapdragon 600 quad-core system-on-a-chip (SoC) processor, which has a price tag of $20. Compare this to the Korean — and some other international versions — that use Samsung's own Octacore Exynos 5 eight-core processor, which has a price tag of $28. The bigger price tag brings with it a more powerful processor that allows the Octacore Exynos 5-equipped smartphone to carry out unique, processor-intensive functions that are simply not possible with the Snapdragon processor. These features include an innovative eye-movement tracking and recognition system, which allows a user to pause a video by doing nothing more than looking away from the display.

The Octacore Exynos 5 also features ARM's big.little architecture, which consists of four 1.6GHz Cortex-A15 "big" cores and a further four 1.2GHz Cortex-A7 "little" cores. The "big" cores take on the heavier, processor intensive tasks — and therefore consume more power — while the "little" cores, which are more power efficient, are designated the less demanding tasks. The idea behind the "big.little" architecture is to balance out performance and power efficiency.

The wireless is also different, with the US version using the MDM9215M and WTR1605L chips from Qualcomm, while the Korean version uses Samsung's own baseband and radio frequency transceiver and front end, which costs $1.50 more than the Qualcomm part. This difference is down to how Qualcomm has essentially captured the market for long-term evolution (LTE) in the US, and how its silicon is seen as the de facto choice among smartphone makers.

There are a few other minor differences between the two versions, including:

  • Silicon Motion Mobile TV SoC inside the Korean version, whereas the US version features a separate Fujitsu image processor to take the load off the processor when using the camera.

  • The Korean S4 has a discrete BCM47521 from Broadcom to support GPS, while this is part of the Snapdragon 600 in the US version.

Another factor that becomes apparent from the teardown is that both versions of the Galaxy S4 handset make extensive use of Samsung components.

"No other company in the world has an internal supply chain like Samsung's," Leung said. "The display, memory, apps processor, baseband, RF transceiver, cameras, power amplifier, and a range of other parts — all these make Samsung unique in its capability to supply key parts and capture so much value in a mobile device."

Will the Galaxy S4 herald in a near where manufacturers make different handset for different markets?

Topics: Mobility, Processors, Samsung, Smartphones

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

9 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Typo?

    ...and how its siloon is seen as the de facto choice among smartphone makers.

    What's a siloon?
    THavoc
  • Double battery...

    To many, this is at least as significant as the processor!!
    Techboy_z
  • Tests show that those SoCs are equal (some tests lightly better for ...

    ... Snapdragon, other tests are slightly better for Exynos).

    The quantity of cores does not matter at all, especially considering that additional cores in Exynos makes only symbolic difference in their real-life performance; they are superweak.
    DDERSSS
    • "they are superweak"

      You do realize you're not going to find a more powerful chip than that right? And it's not just the fact that is has more cores. In fact in runs in two sets of four. That is the most powerful chip ever featured in a phone. Even the PS4 runs with an eight-core chip. Calling this processor weak is calling all other chips STONE-AGE.
      Facts
      • stupid comment

        @"they are superweak"

        "That is the most powerful chip ever featured in a phone"?

        That depends totally on how you test. And since very few activities in a phone require or can make use of that level or processing, for most purposes the post powerful chip in a phone will be at most dual core, the issue being to have the fastest uniprocessor kept busy on the critical path thread.

        Now the exyos octra probably IS the most powerful processor that is used in a phone, measured in terms of it's speed for doing complex heavyweight image manipulation in Adobe Photoshop in a desktop.

        Is that what you use your phone processor for?

        It's not going to help it any in most of the things I do on a smartphone. For them its weak.
        Henry 3 Dogg
    • Re: Tests...

      Yeah, this article is rather disingenuous in that respect.

      "Will American owners of the S4 feel short-changed?"

      If the media keeps hyping the Exynos, probably so, but as DDERSSS says, side-by-side tests show little difference between the variants, even in battery life, which is where BIG.little should theoretically shine. Understand this - Even though the Exynos has eight cores, there will NEVER be any point at which all eight cores will be engaged. It's not supposed to be a more powerful processor, it's supposed to be a more power efficient processor.
      vic@...
  • Near fraud

    This level of product differentiation is not about different consumer preferences in different markets.

    There may be a component of adapting to supply chain limitations.

    But I think this is primarily about having a faster device to ship to reviewers, and hoping that customers will buy the slower, cheaper to make device, believing that they are buying what they saw reviewed.
    Henry 3 Dogg
  • ....?

    For the extra $30-40 bucks why not give the US the same upgrades since at the price point the small price increase isnt really a factor since the phone is sky high already.
    Fletchguy
  • Each One Gets A Gallon's Worth

    The US gets a US gallon's worth, the rest of the world gets an Imperial gallon's worth.
    ldo17