Linux 'easier to manage' than Windows

Linux 'easier to manage' than Windows

Summary: Survey: Research has found that administrators are more productive when working with Linux servers rather than those running Windows, but not everyone agrees with the results

SHARE:

Linux administrators are able to effectively manage more servers than Windows administrators, according to a study published on Monday.

The employees of over 200 companies that run Linux were interviewed for the Get the Truth on Linux Managementstudy, which was sponsored by pro-Linux organisation the Open Source Development Labs (OSDL) and Linux management software vendor Levanta.

EMA found that in sites with up to 100 servers — which accounted for 85 percent of respondents — each Linux administrator managed 15 servers on average, while Windows administrators managed only 12 servers. It did not have any conclusive data on larger sites, but said that across all respondents, each Linux administrator managed an average of 68 servers, while each Windows administrator managed only 32 servers.

But Marty Kacin, the chief technical officer of KACE, a vendor of Windows management software, argued that administrators can manage many more Windows servers than this.

"Current Windows management technology enables a single administrator to manage 50 to 100 Windows machines," said Kacin.

The study also found that 95 percent of Linux administrators spend less than 10 minutes per server per week managing viruses and spyware, with the majority of respondents spending less time on security management for Linux servers than for Window servers. One administrator for a major US bank reportedly spent twice as much time working on virus and spyware protection for Windows than for Linux.

Stuart Cohen, chief executive of the OSDL, said the study showed that Linux systems are at least as easy to manage as Windows systems.

''For too long, special interest groups have attacked the manageability of Linux, and fuelled the FUD that Linux environments are somehow more difficult or labour-intensive to manage than Windows environments,'' Cohen said in a statement. ''In fact, Linux system management tools are in many cases outpacing Windows management tools," Cohen claimed.

Topics: Apps, Software Development

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

2 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Before anyone accuses this article of being Linux FUD, I suggest you read http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS9173276172.html where it says that the researchers admit that they hadn't interviewed that many Windows Server users, and that they're going to be biased because of what they do.
    anonymous
  • "For example, while they looked at large companies with over a thousand Linux servers, they didn't look at enough companies with large numbers of Windows servers to really compare them. Unlike a certain company in Redmond, Wash., rather than just give bogus results, OSDL and Levanta said they couldn't make a valid comparison and moved on."
    The report confirms that if you want actual facts, you believe the Linux study. If, on the other hand, you enjoy FUD, believe the M$ study.
    anonymous