McKinnon case sees fresh delay over psychiatric dispute

McKinnon case sees fresh delay over psychiatric dispute

Summary: NASA hacker Gary McKinnon has been given two weeks to agree to a further psychiatric assessment, a measure requested by the home secretary to help her decide on his extradition case

TOPICS: Security

The extradition case against Gary McKinnon has been adjourned while authorities wait to see if the self-confessed NASA hacker will submit to another psychiatric examination, as requested by the Home Office.

McKinnon faces extradition to the US for hacking into NASA and Pentagon systems between 2001-2. He admits doing this, but says he was looking for evidence of UFOs. He suffers from Asperger's Syndrome, and his mother Janis Sharp claims he is too fragile for further assessment, let alone extradition and the prospect of 60 years in jail.

According to the Press Association, High Court judges adjourned the case on Thursday. McKinnon has two weeks to say whether he will agree to a further examination, and the next hearing in the case will take place on 23 or 24 July.

Home secretary Theresa May has said a fresh examination is necessary for her to assess whether he really is at risk of suicide if extradited. She is apparently "very near" a decision, according to the BBC.

The judges have previously expressed frustration at how long McKinnon's case is taking. He was indicted in the US in 2002 and the extradition case has been running on since 2004 — Theresa May is the sixth home secretary to be dealing with it.


In a statement on Wednesday, Sharp said the numerous psychiatric assessments McKinnon has undergone during the case "continue to take their toll on his extremely fragile mental state". She said the existing diagnoses should be sufficient to convince the home secretary to scrap the extradition.

"I do not want any more pressure placed on my son that could push him over the edge potentially causing him to take his own life or to be confined to a mental institution for 50 years, and dying there as my grandmother did," Sharp said.

McKinnon was diagnosed with Asperger's Syndrome, a form of high-functioning autism, in 2008.

His case has provided a rallying point for those opposed to the UK-US extradition agreement. The 'war on terror' deal allows the US to demand the extradition of UK citizens for crimes in the US, without having to show UK authorities evidence for the allegations. The UK does not have the same right.

In the last year, McKinnon's case has been joined by that of Richard O'Dwyer, a British student who ran a website linking to unlawfully copied music. O'Dwyer faces extradition to the US on charges of copyright infringement and conspiracy to commit copyright infringement.

Topic: Security

David Meyer

About David Meyer

David Meyer is a freelance technology journalist. He fell into journalism when he realised his musical career wouldn't pay the bills. David's main focus is on communications, as well as internet technologies, regulation and mobile devices.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


1 comment
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • He should come to the US and face his charges.

    He knowingly hacked the US Governments computers, he admits to doing it. The US at first went easy on him, they wanted him charged with a misdemeanour 'computer misuse law' the UK wouldnt charge him he said he was relieved. Then they offered him a plea deal, he turned it down. That was the US being nice, they then went after him. When the US went after him then all of a sudden he came back and said he would say he was guilty of the computer misuse law, but by then it was to late. The US was merciful and appeasing he slapped us in the face. Like most Brits he thought it was above the law, like attaching a computer network right after 911 in a time of war the US wouldnt go after him. Really? Now the stress of this is putting him on the edge, the stress that he put himself in because he didnt take the deals to begin with? This is not about the US vs UK, its about right and wrong. He knew what he was doing was wrong, he got caught only because he miscalculated the time zones and took control over someones computer when they were there. He said this, so my question if he didnt actually believe what he was doing was wrong why did he have to calculate the time zones, I mean if he didnt believe what he was doing was wrong why did it matter?