Microsoft AntiSpyware (Beta): a first look
Summary: Following its December purchase of anti-spyware specialist Giant, Microsoft has produced a tool designed to protect Windows against spyware. We take a first look at the beta version.
A major plank of Microsoft's corporate strategy has always been to buy products from its competitors, rather than pour resources into home-grown developments. Famously, back in 1980, when IBM was seeking an operating system for its PCs, Microsoft bought q-DOS (a.k.a 'Quick and Dirty Operating System') from developer Tim Paterson for $50,000 and called it MS-DOS. As we all know, MS-DOS licenses subsequently earned Microsoft billions.
With the purchase of anti-spyware specialist Giant in December 2004, Microsoft obtained the basis for its AntiSpyware product, which has now appeared in beta form. There are plenty of other anti-spyware programs available: the most popular, Ad-Aware, is available in a free version, although others are paid-for products. Life could become more difficult for the latter if the final version of Microsoft's tool becomes available for free.






Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Microsoft has not changed, it appears they are still looking for sneaky ways to kill off competing technology.
Sounds like the anti-ms crowd continues it's tradition of FUD
1. So far, Microsoft has made barely any changes to the program since buying it from Giant -- mostly just putting the Microsoft name on it.
2. The software is in beta. The whole purpose of beta is to have these types of issues found and resolved. Have you contacted Microsoft so they can investigate this?
Take it from me its just like all the rest of Bill gates products, IT Dont Work
While I have issues with Microsoft on some of their software functionality it is important that each product should be judged on it's own merits, or failures, and not on blind prejudice and ignorance.
My own experience of MS AntiSpyware, so far, is that it performs well compared against Ad-Aware SE (which I have previously used) and has a slightly better user interface. So far I have no grounds for complaint.