Microsoft: Browser standards drive innovation

Summary: As the major browsers become more similar, Microsoft says that users and developers are benefiting from a focus on speed and quality instead of incompatible features

There is less difference between the major web browsers like Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome and Internet Explorer than ever before, according to Microsoft developer evangelist Martin Beeby.

Web standards and developer ecosystems help drive browser innovation, Beeby told an audience of developers at the HTML5 Live one-day conference in London on Wednesday, adding that since the release of Internet Explorer 9 (IE9), there are fewer differences between the major browser vendors.

"There's more similarities between all the browser manufacturers — Opera, Safari, Chrome and IE — than there ever has been before, and that's a huge win for the industry," Beeby said. "We're at a stage where Google and Internet Explorer and Firefox are all publicly in marketing terms trying to push forward and show which is the fastest and which is the best, but for developers and architects the real win is that browsers are more similar than ever before."

The push towards homogenisation from Microsoft came with the realisation of its falling browser market share following its release of IE6 in 2001.

"I think it peaked around 2003, where something like 95 percent of the web were using Internet Explorer, 90 percent of them were using IE6," Beeby said. "From the release of IE6 in 2001, we then had this whole huge gaping hole of a gap, where we had the rise of the competition. Our 95-percent market share dwindled as the competition delivered faster, better, more standards-compliant browsers with the ecosystem to support it."

"What's really interesting about the rise of Firefox in particular is that if you look at the data, one of the things that you'll see is that a lot of people moved to Firefox for one simple thing — it had tabbed browsing. That innovation in the UI drove so many people to Firefox," he added.

Embracing standards

Microsoft now has 16 full-time employees working with the W3C to standardise HTML5 and CSS 3 specifications, and it has submitted around 1700 test cases, he added.

Beeby also said that there is now far more dialogue between rival browser manufacturers to ensure standards can be put in place that encourage innovation, and that Microsoft had shifted strategies in developing its current and next-generation browsers, moving from the "very insular" development of IE6, 7 and 8 to a more open approach that encouraged feedback from the community for IE9.

"Finally browser manufacturers are talking to each other, and we're talking to other browser manufacturers too. There's no single company controlling the web, and that's a good thing," he said. "People can choose the devices and browsers that they want to choose, not the ones that are forced on them, it feels to me that with releases like IE9 and IE10, Microsoft is finally back into this developer community."

No move to rapid release

Beeby confirmed that the company is not currently trying to compete with the Firefox or Chrome's rapid-release schedule.

"We don't share Google's model at the moment of the six-week cadence. We need to make sure that any standard we put into the browser was finished, was ready, was well standardised and there was broad agreement in the industry," Beeby said. "And that's because we don't want to make the same mistakes as with IE6, the mistake of putting something in a browser that you can't take back. Because once you put it in, it's always there.

"Even with all the updating, there will still be versions of older browsers in use... there will still people be using Netscape Gold today," he said.

The next version of Internet Explorer, IE10, brings a number of new features, including expanded HTML5 and CSS 3 support for things such as gradients, multi-column support and flexible grids. It will also improve JavaScript support and bring a 'chromeless' mode, replacing the traditional browser UI with a full-screen viewing experience.

IE10 is due to ship by default with Windows 8 — and is available as part of the Windows 8 Developer Preview — when it is released in 2012.

Beeby added that removing browser chrome was a trend he expected to see across the entire industry in the near future.


Get the latest technology news and analysis, blogs and reviews delivered directly to your inbox with ZDNet UK's newsletters.

Topic: Apps

About

With several years' experience covering everything in the world of telecoms and mobility, Ben's your man if it involves a smartphone, tablet, laptop, or any other piece of tech small enough to carry around with you.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

8 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Mr. Ben Woods
    Pardon me to say: there is no comparison to Google Chrome and your comparison needs to be considered with its MONEY involved
    IE-9's browser a "Still-Born child of Microsoft'; the BING, according me, can't be compared with Google's. Yes Microsoft has thrust Bing on users of their Operative System Win-7 I use.

    Mozilla Firefox is good yet it has to compete.
    I tried Win-8 Dev Per; God bless my system having other software/hardware too
    and I know how I reverted back to Win-7 Ultimate: Operative System
    Manmohan Rajyana-cb750
  • "What's really interesting about the rise of Firefox in particular is that if you look at the data, one of the things that you’ll see is that a lot of people moved to Firefox for one simple thing — it had tabbed browsing."
    Well, that plus it was faster and more secure!
    47674
  • No kidding, if I'm using Google Chrome, and to a slightly less extent Firefox in Ubuntu 11.10, I've noticed I can actually forget which operating system I'm currently using, and have to minimise the screen to remind me I'm actually using Ubuntu. Flash has evolved on Linux, and there is very little discernable difference in performance, compared to Win7/Win XP. If anything it is faster than Win7. Ubuntu has come of age. Give it a try, the install is better than anything Microsoft has put out.
    adamjarvis
  • @47674 - Indeed it was. I think the point he was getting at is that a high percentage of internet users aren't technically savvy, or they simply won't know or care about the security of their browser. It was probably all the more true in 2003 as well, with even fewer people up to speed about internet security. As you said, it was faster too. But the feature that drove many non-technical people to try out a new browser was to do with usability and a change in the way in which they used the tool. Of course, a lot of technically-minded people were already using it for the reasons you stated, as well as add-on support and the developer eco-system.

    On a side note, I used to use Firefox by default but find it a bit too cumbersome at the moment, so, for now I use Chrome.

    @Manmohan Thankfully, there are now a lot of browsers out there that offer a similar and reliable level of performance, and even more modified offshoots of the Firefox or Chrome open source code, such as Rockmelt. I like the lightweight feel of Chrome, the plethora of add-ons for Firefox (though that's what ultimately slows it down for me) and the pinning feature of IE9. That's without even considering which operating system it's running on...
    Ben Woods
  • Ben Woods
    >That's without even considering which operating systme it's running on
    Well with IE9, you only have one choice (Well two, if you include its brother - Vista/Win7) and it really isn't worth it solely for IE9.
    If you ever find yourself on another 'Alien' OS, at least things will be familar if you use either Firefox or Chrome.
    adamjarvis
  • I really appreciate the fact that ZDNet UK includes these humorous articles. I got so many really good belly-laughs out of this on that my stomach hurt when I was done. Well, either that or it just made me ill. Microsoft? Browsers? NOT.
    j.a.watson@...
  • I am not totally against the content of this article. It is true that browsers are becoming more alike. But, it's basically because features are copied among them, and a lot of these features have been introduced by the open source community. Thankfully, the open source community has NOT been copying features from IE in return, like the millions of browser plugins that check for malicious sites and the convoluted series of additional security checks that IE has, that only make IE more clunky than ever. IE has been trailing in features for years. However in response to the statement by Microsoft: "a lot of people moved to Firefox for one simple thing — it had tabbed browsing.", this is only partially true. Netscape/Firefox were the first to introduce tabbed browsing, that's true, but users have migrated to Firefox over the years because it just works, and because Firefox is not tied tightly to Windows; IE is so tightly integrated to Windows that it allows malware a direct channel to the core Windows operating system. This is extremely bad for security. In Firefox things don't break from version to version nearly as much as they do in IE; Firefox is more backwards compatible. To back this up, I challenge you to ask any web developer which browser is better at adhering to standards, and which is less headache for testing... I can almost guarantee the answer will be Firefox, or any other browser other than IE.

    From the sounds of it, IE10 will be released for Windows 7 or newer. Oops, if you don't get our your wallet soon and pay Microsoft to upgrade Windows 7 or 8, you will be locked out from using IE10. That is, if you are still using Windows and/or IE. This is another scheme by Microsoft to force customers into upgrading Windows, although I don't think it's working out too well. People are instead using alternative browsers, like Firefox and Chrome, since those can be installed on old versions of Windows without restrictions. And Microsoft is still puzzled why IE's total market share is dwindling close to 50%, down from 90%+?
    Chris_Clay
  • adamjarvis :

    You make a very good point: Internet Explorer is incompatible with Mac OS X, GNU/Linux, and every other operating system other than Windows. So yes, jumping from Windows to GNU/Linux for example, using Firefox or Chrome is no different between the two.
    Chris_Clay