Microsoft: Here's what you need to do with Surface tablets

Microsoft: Here's what you need to do with Surface tablets

Summary: It's common knowledge that Microsoft hasn't done too well with the Surface tablets. Here's what the folks in Redmond need to do to get Surface in customers' hands.

SHARE:
179

Branding and software

Surface logo

To get advertising right we need to address branding. Since the whole idea behind this new Surface is to make it simple, do the same with the product name. You already have a great name right in front of you. Surface. Not Surface This or Surface That, just Surface. It's simple, direct, and catchy. It conveys the idea it's for everyone.

There's a great slogan that can drive this home in all ads:

Simply Surface

You've probably figured out the primary focus of the hardware and the advertising of same -- keep it simple. No crazed dancing children, no dancing on the conference table, just show real people doing real things with the Surface. The nice, easy Surface. Simply Surface.

Courier

Hardware concept aside, don't overlook the software. Sure it's full Windows 8, and owners can install their own software, but that's not the message you want to push. Microsoft, you won't like the truth, and that is that mainstream tablet shoppers do not want Windows. They want a simple tablet that does what they want. Besides the nice hardware they want great apps.

What you need to have, I'd go as far to say you must have, is at least one app that takes advantage of the Surface in a way that the competition can't take advantage of their tablets.

The ads should show people capturing and creating ideas from the information that is around them using the special app on the Surface.

Microsoft, remember the concept you killed, the Courier? Leave the device dead but bring back the software for the Surface. A graphical, free form type of journal that can be whatever the user wants it to be. Have full drag and drop capability, easy sketching, and searching of the user's note pages. 

Users of the Surface should be able to drag anything, from any Metro app, directly to any page of the Courier app. They can drop it anywhere on the page they want and draw a link from it to anything else on the page. They can capture anything, or write anything they want on the fly with either the pen, onscreen keyboard, or by dragging it by fingertip. While anything but simple under the hood, the Courier app is drop-dead simple to operate. 

This app is like nothing currently on any platform or tablet. It can be many things to many people, which can be clearly shown in ads. These ads will show how easy it is to use this most creative of apps. Real people using information from existing sources, e.g. the web, and easily using it to create ideas and even art. Simply Surface.

Conclusion

This is my unsolicited advice to Microsoft, which it can take with a rather large grain of salt. It can take it or leave it as it sees fit. But I feel pretty confident that this plan for the Surface would make it a household word.

To bring the Microsoft tablet to the mainstream, which is where it needs to be to get the sales big enough to justify retooling Windows 8 to fit the slate, a new Surface needs to be built. A thin, sexy tablet that will appeal to the mainstream tablet shopper.

The Surface, and that's what it should be named, will be targeted at the market with an ad campaign that shows off the attractive tablet being used by real people doing real things, and simply. No mention of Windows nor Office, simply show the tablet doing the things tablet owners want to do.

The Simply Surface ad campaign should spend a lot of time showing off the new Courier app written just for the Surface. People capturing and creating ideas from the information that is around them. The ads should show not only how easy Courier is to use, but how fun it is to grab pertinent stuff and drag it to the user's page. It's like capturing ideas on a napkin but way more fun.

Run an ad and show a bride-to-be dragging a photo of a wedding gown to the Courier page. She sketches personal changes she'd like to see, then drags the changes to the Mail app to send it to her best friend. The friend drags it from the email to her Courier page and writes notes on it to send back.

In another ad show a couple standing in front of their old fireplace. They snap a photo using the camera on the Surface, which appears instantly on their Courier note page. They write notes on the photo indicating what they want their contractor to change and then drag it to an email to him. He gets it and writes an estimate of what that would cost on his Surface and then emails it back.

Last but not least, end each ad, no matter the medium, with the following catch phrase:

Simple. Surface. Simply Surface. By Microsoft.

Topics: Mobility, Tablets, Windows 8

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

179 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Windows Store just needs more apps

    I've been using Windows Phone and Surface RT. Love the products, but it's almost impossible to convert my friends because of the apps issue in the store. I figured out that I'm not a typical "consumer" since I really utilize productivity tools and don't care much for media streaming other than the occasional Xbox music pass that I got from the initial purchase of the Surface RT.
    erichon99
    • Before they go for more apps

      they should go for BETTER apps. Supposedly 8.1 is trying to tackle that issue, but that is the biggest complaint I've seen myself.
      Michael Kelly
  • Improvement

    Tablet need:
    1. Thin
    2. Light.
    3. Have enough free space
    4. Easy to use.
    Above point are not available on Surface.

    Regarding the USB and Memory card, I think needed for many people. especially for corporate use.
    Utomo Prawiro
  • Mac_PC_FenceSitter is right

    The WinRT API is incapable of handling the "Courier" functionality Kendrick describes. It doesn't support drag-and-drop between Metro apps. MSFT should have added a simple scalable UI API to the existing Win32 API. Instead, they created an entirely new framework (which simply sits on top of the existing Win32 APIs). My guess is that it was an attempt to monetize the existing Windows user base -- i.e. get a cut of each app sold in the Walled Garden. I think the odds are 50/50 that this decision will end up killing Windows and taking down the rest of MSFT with it. A horrible mistake.
    windews
    • taking down the rest of MSFT with it.

      No doubt! Mafiasoft is going down the tubes. Most people are brain washed and that includes the criminals on Wall Street, into drinking the Redmond cool aid.

      What do I mean?

      For starters is anyone aware of the fact that MicroKlunk only has two cash producers?

      What are they you say?

      1. Windows licenses
      2. Office licenses

      Now take a look at the drop in windows license sales and guess what you have?

      A dying company left with just one product: Office which no one uses in the mobile market.

      The devil is getting what is coming to him in Redmond Washington.

      It's about time!
      ITJohnguru
  • Microsoft: Here's what you need to do with Surface tablets

    Great points.

    I agree that a new table must be created around simplicity. Main use case is hold it with one hand and navigate with fingers. Additional use case will be use the table in a desktop, with the attached keyboard to please 20% of the users that consider that important in the consumer market.
    DataScienceGeek
    • 20% is way too much

      I doubt more than 5% of the tablet users care to attach a keyboard or put the tablet in "productivity" position on a table. For these tasks they already have desktop computers, notebooks etc.

      I would even go that far to suggest that even 5% is way too much.
      danbi
      • I agree

        I actually have had keyboards for both of my tablets, which I've been using for over three years instead of a laptop. But I also use desktops, at home and at work. Most of the time, I'm using the tablet in "tablet mode" and have absolutely no use for a keyboard. It's much better as a device for reading datasheets in a lab, for taking notes in a meeting (better still with a pen/stylus), etc.

        I think Microsoft simply distrusted "tablet mode". The core of their advertising has been around their snap-on keyboards. As silly and confusing (at least to those not following tech news) as those ads have been, they also speak to Microsoft's inner thought process, as many ads do. You tend to find those folks happy with the Surface are those still basically using it -- particularly the Pro -- in "laptop mode".

        And that's fine... but really, what's then the point of the Surface? You can buy a far more powerful laptop with a better, larger screen and enough RAM and storage to actually be a decent Windows computer for less than a Surface Pro, and it does the laptop thing just dandy. The Surface Pro, I believe, is split between some buyers using it basically as an "Ultrabook", and perhaps a few buying it as a real Windows tablet, much as a very few buyers have bought Windows tablets for the last decade.

        I'm not sure about the conclusions, but the article is spot-on about the fact that Microsoft hasn't given anyone a reason to buy a Surface, particularly consumers.
        Hazydave
        • which laptop

          Hazydave,

          Here is the problem. I don't want or need more power or a larger higher res screen than a Surface Pro. I agree with your comments but have not found another usable touch screen laptop the size and weight of the Surface. By usable I mean that the screen is supported rigidly so that touches and taps work right. I've returned two touch screen laptops so far because of this problem. I think this rigidity provides a more consistent user experience and is the real reason people are liking smaller tablets.

          The closest I've seen are the sony x11 and the Lenovo x1. Here is my current travel PC wish list. A BayTrail or Haswell unit with 4GB Ram, 256GB SSD, USB 3.0, SD slot, at least 8 hours of life. The screen size is 11 inch 1366x768 OLED screen with 5 point touch, fingerprint reader. Closed size 6 by 11.5 inches and under 1.5 pounds. A laptop should be smaller in two dimensions and thicker than a tablet of the same screen size because the bezel is so wide on tablets.

          I still use a nearly 5 year old Atom netbook upgraded to a 128B SSD and Win 8 for my travel unit. My wife and I have been doing two week trips with a 20 to 25 pound carry on pack each. 3.5 pounds of that is the netbook and charger. I want to cut that machine weight at least in half and get the loaded pack under 15 pounds. I'm the support of last resort on a vertical program so I have to be able to do remote support and run the end users data locally if needed in order to be gone. My wife has a Surface Pro and is using it for phone development and likes it. She used it like a tablet for a while but now does a lot of that quick lookup stuff using the voice search on her 920. I've used the Surface and my HP Touchpad plus the two other touch enabled laptops so I'm sure that my ideal fit would be worth the price. If it does not exist by November it will be a BayTrail tablet plus add-ons for me.
          mswift@...
  • Half right

    Agree, the RT version mostly only added more total confusion to the ongoing story of microsofts techtonical shifts & inability to stick with things that just work, such as the old oh so sadly dumped zune music portal supposedly to follow the big Apple path & try to bring everything under the xbox portal , an extremely annoying haphazard attempt to follow Apples lead in walled garden thinking without taking into consideration that ITunes may well fell the big hungry 30% markup Apple insist on making on anyone that use their systems, so we all suffer thanks to sheer corporate monopolistic greed, very bad move there Microsoft.
    Back to the point, me thinks the only main drawback of the surface pro is the form factor, which hopefully has to considerably improve with the advent of haswell chips, half the depth & weight would make it hard to beat in total full useability stakes, the pro is too weighty awkward to hold & runs far too hot, not that that doesn't make it a winner in cooler climates, but as far as one would like it to be, -- just more comfortable to hold & use as an all-round portable fully functional productive handheld computer device.. a clear winner perhaps..
    yofuss
    • Re: half the depth & weight

      This is unlikely to happen, because the Haswell chip is actually bigger than the Ivy Bridge. The Surface Pro also severely suffers from short battery life, which is only fixable by installing larger battery inside (Haswell alone, won't do it).

      Many laughed at the iPad for making the integrated ports external (via an universal port and adapter), but this removes bulk from the device and also leaves more space for larger battery. If Microsoft are serious about mobile, they should go that direction. For an Intel CPU based system the obvious path is Thunderbolt. In fact, for the price tag it has and for the target audience the Surface Pro expects --- if the next version lacks Thunderbolt it will not sell much.

      At the end, the main drawback for the Surface Pro is not the hardware, but the software and most definitely Windows.
      danbi
      • Thunderbolt will never catch on

        for the simple reason it requires licensing by Apple and is too expensive. USB 3.0 already covers anything the average user would need. Thunderbolt is having the same problem that Firewire had, it came too late.
        Jason Joyner
        • Thunderbolt belongs to both Apple AND Intel

          There's no reason to worry about the licensing, and if I remember correctly, Apple adamantly stated that they would not ask licensing fees for the technology.

          USB is obsolete and too unstable by comparison.
          Vulpinemac
          • Correct

            However, Apple transferred the Thunderbolt trademark to Intel, so legally it belongs to Intel. It was co-develped by Intel and Apple. It might suffer the same fate as FireWire, but it runs double the speed of USB 3.0 and has two channels that run at twice the speed. Perhaps Apple should have kept the trademark and let Apple marketing push it through.
            ManoaHI
        • Thunderbolt or USB

          USB and Thunderbolt are very, very different technologies. Thunderbolt is more or less a signaling technology, that lets the PCI-Express lanes and the Display Port interfaces of the CPU to be exported outside the computer box. Any "adapter" to thunderbolt is actually an PCI-Express device sitting off the bus lanes. You can connect anything that you can connect to a PCI-Express bus to Thunderbolt. As a bonus, it multiplexes the DisplayPort signals, which is ideal for portable devices.

          USB in comparison is just a serial bus, with a very complex and troublesome protocol stack.
          danbi
    • You're a babe in the woods...

      If you think the 30% that Apple charges is greedy or exorbitant. If you look at the world of content creation and companies like Getty or Corbis the ratio is more likely to be the other way around.
      rfoto
  • good advice

    I will also add, that the thing must be *cheap*. Cheaper than the iPad, or it will not sell.
    c'est la vie.

    Anyway, I think it's an pipe dream... Microsoft can't write any software like the Courier you describe, not in less than five years. Similar software already exists: for example Evernote (and plenty of other apps). This software is pretty much multi-platform already and has millions and millions of users. Hard for Microsoft to replicate that...
    Also.. full Windows? With antivirus running in the background and all the bloat? On a light and thin tablet that runs over 10 hours on battery. Why does nobody ask why Microsoft was not able to do anything meaningful with tablets for over a decade?

    But.. Hope leaves last.
    danbi
    • Courier already "exists"

      It was a working tablet, albeit a prototype - a two screened tablet, both in 4:3 format. Unfortunately, it was canned a few years ago and later Surface emerged.
      Wakemewhentrollsgone
      • Did it exist?

        I remember reading somewhere that the entire demo was just computer generated imagery and there was no substantial software written.
        rfoto
        • Did it exist?

          Yes it does exist Darn it!

          It exists in the Hairless Monkey Man Balmer's imagination which the cool aid drinkers on Wall Street are actually so stupid they believe it!

          What exists? Show me?

          VAPORWARE! with a gallon of FUD mixed in it.

          So it exists because the Chair Throwing monkey man says so!

          WISE UP PEOPLE!
          ITJohnguru