Microsoft is pushing users and vendors to Macs and Linux
Summary: Microsoft is insisting that users and vendors do things its way with Windows 8 and some of them aren't going to take it anymore.

What is Microsoft thinking? First, the company decided that it was going to compete with its own partners of decades in the growing tablet market with its Surface tablet. Then, it decided that it's going to force feed Windows 8 users its “Metro” interface. Can they really be surprised when their partners and customers start to turn their back on them?
Microsoft has always been a “my way or the highway” kind of company and it worked... when they have a lock on the desktop. That was in the 90s and 00s, it's the twenty-teens now and the desktop is no longer the center of the computing universe. Now, we use tablets and smartphones as well and we do much, sometimes most, of our “desktop” work on Web sites and with cloud-based applications.
I know it, you know it, and now Acer is reminding Microsoft that they know it as well. Acer CEO JT Wang said that Microsoft competing with its partners “will create a huge negative impact for the [computer hardware] ecosystem and other brands may take a negative reaction. It is not something you are good at so please think twice." Acer's global PC operation chief Campbell Kan added Acer was debating whether to "find other alternatives" to Windows.
Microsoft won't think twice. The company knows, and plans, on competing with its one time partners. You can think Acer saying it may walk away from Microsoft is laughable, but there's nothing funny about it.
Think about it. If your supplier told you and the world that they were going to compete with you in the hottest part of the market, tablets, could you afford to keep working with them? In a business where the main product, PCs, have razor-thin margins? I don't think so.
For PC vendors like Acer there's only one viable alternative: Linux. Dell has shown that both Red Hat Enterprise Linux and Ubuntu can sell.
The vendors, however, aren't just limited to a traditional Linux desktop. Cloud-based Linux systems, such as Peppermint and Google's Chrome OS are also viable alternatives. In addition, Google is showing signs of releasing a version of Android that would work well as a desktop operating system.
For users, there's also always Apple's Macs. Even with their high price tags, Macs keep getting more popular and its latest operating system, Mountain Lion, unlike Windows 8 is being greeted with joy by most of its users.
The same can't be said for Windows 8. In a TechRepublic survey only 349 out of 1,888 IT pros said that their companies planned to upgrade to Windows 8. 884 said their business had no such plans while 655 were undecided.
Among other things they didn't like about Windows 8 were: the lack of a start menu; the need for massive training to get people used to the new “Metro” interface; and the fact that the corporate desktop seems to be an afterthought. And, that was before we found out that Microsoft is, by design, going to make it harder to provide a start menu or avoid the desktop-unfriendly Metro!
It's clear now that Windows 8 is not an operating system that Microsoft's partners or its long-time users can love. Isn't it time to give an alternative a try? I think so.
Related Stories:
Microsoft's Surface strategy may force us to find another platform, says Acer
Microsoft said to block ability to boot straight to desktop in Windows 8
Five ways to skip Windows 8
Microsoft poisons its partners
Does the Surface spat open the door for Linux?
Acer CEO's 'think twice' Surface warning to Microsoft laughable
Has Microsoft opened the door to the Linux desktop?
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
I think not
Really!!
RE: I think not
The shaft?
Or how about trying to bring a 5 year old laptop back to life? I thought having software you monkey with for hours trying to get the stupid WiFi connection in Linux was "the shaft." But no, paying $40 for an upgrade and being 100% compatible is "the shaft."
Man, I'm so onboard with the rest of you monkeys, it's not even funny. "The Shaft" redefined as "it just continues to work."
As for this flame-bait article, no. NOOOOO... I don't think the companies and governments are going to switch infrastructures because W8 gets released. They'll continue to do what they always do. Stick to the previous O.S. for 5 years and re-evaluate. We just got W7 after being on XP for the past "who knows" how many years.
As for users, um... Linux - stuff like Netflix and Office and modern gaming doesn't work, so I don't think you'll be migrating them anytime soon. um... Apple? Yeah, because I like as a user having to pay the Apple tax everytime they do an upgrade to all my equipment and software, yet still have a 5% penetration on the gaming industry. I also like having the #1 least secure operating system on the planet (but I feel confident that Apple will assure me it's "all ok" - well, at least until the press forces their hand).
No, I don't need to prove it to you by providing links. Do your own homework - LMGTFY is for people who can't look stuff up on their own. If you're too lazy or too brainwashed, then I'm sure as heck not going to convince you.
So yeah... we're migrating in droves. Let me tell you what...
Been on Windows Since 3.1 and Old DOS Pro
thoilness, Windows Surface Retard
Nah. This is just to counter other articles people have been writing
Plus 1
Really?
Because as a simple, basic, single use system
As for Android, is it popular, or just what comes on the cheap and free phones that the vast majority of people get?
Android is popular - but that's irrelevant.
As for servers, the discussion is about client systems. So that's also irrelevant. Linux as servers are popular because they're free. But no one actually uses it directly - they run a service like Apache and then only touch it again for updates or when there's a problem.
So isn't that just a difference in use?
I think the analogy would be that for running out to get gas for the lawn mower, I would take the station wagon, not the BMW. The BMW I would use for most everything else.
Different cars, different uses.
Is windows a BMW in this analogy?
So, your analogy is not even close.
Samba 4 can do AD?
And sales of Windows server show that people do buy them for AD, not Linux servers running the watered down version of it in Samba.
AD in Samba
Ubuntu Fedora
The differencw here is that Android Linux is put on store shelves and advertised. No need to do your own install.
And as for Linux servers yes they are free AND real servers. Nobody seriously considers Windows servers unless its for Exchange or if its in a .net shop in which case most of the folks there don't know any better.
You're opinion is irrelevant.
Windows sucks and I hope SJVN proves to be correct with the opinions he has in articles like this.
WRONG, from start to end
- let's make it simple: Android is Linux, Linux is Android, Kindle is Android, Nook is Android, Ubuntu is Linux, and is all one extended family, including Linux on routers to supercomputers.
So, it's not popular because it's Linux - it's popular because you never see Linux
- How do you know? do you have a popular-o-meter, to get that kind of granular data? Anyhow the point is irrelevant, is not a popularity contest.
Linux as servers are popular because they're free. But no one actually uses it directly
Sorry to burst your bubble but your nobody include the biggest corporations driving the internet era! And yes you uses it directly, I uses it directly, all day long I google this or that, and every time I'm using the most advanced and powerful internet platform, all Linux based.
The reality is Google outmaneuvered and outsmarted Microsoft, long time ago. Same as Apple/S. Jobs. I know this is hard to swallow, is not easy to be in the losing team.
simple, basic, single use system?
ESX is not Linux