Microsoft IT: How we rolled out Windows 8 to 30,000 users
Summary: Microsoft's IT department offers some of its own tips and tricks -- and lessons learned -- from its internal roll-out of Windows 8.
IT pros and C-suite execs worrying about the learning curve Windows 8 may present to users might be able to take a few cues from Microsoft's own IT organization.
In an August 7 post to its "Office of the CIO" blog, Microsoft detailed some of the lessons it learned when rolling Windows 8 test builds out to its own users.
As of mid-July, Microsoft had more than 30,000 systems and nearly 30,000 employees running Windows 8 and IE10, blogged Patrick O’Rourke, a Director within the strategy, planning and communications team in Microsoft IT. (I'm kind of surprised, and kind of not that this number wasn't a lot higher, given Microsoft has more than 90,000 employees....)
Windows 8 is very different from previous versions of Windows, in terms of its look and feel, the way it is navigated and the way it runs existing and new applications. A number of business users are leery of training costs and other potential issues introduced by a new, touch-first operating system.
Even though Microsoft developers are the ones who created Windows 8, it's worth pointing out that not all of Microsoft's employees are techies. Microsofthas a substantial number of information workers who are not engineers who are using Windows, as well. To help the whole spectrum of employees learning the new OS, Microsoft IT created a new, internal moderated forum/Web app called //pointers, designed to address feedback and requests for help more quickly.
"When reviewing the site traffic to //pointers, we saw that site visits greatly exceeded the number of unique users," O'Rourke noted. "We interpreted this site traffic as positive; the site is sticky and employees are coming back to it. In addition, the volume of recognition badges indicated that, once driven to the community, employees tend to contribute in helping others."
Here's a sample screen of what users see when they come to Pointers site:

The case study on Microsoft's Windows 8 deployment by its IT department offers more on the hows and whys behind Pointers:
"Microsoft IT saw the opportunity to fill the gaps in the existing support channels by creating a new self-help channel in time for the Windows 8 and Internet Explorer 10 Developer and Consumer Previews. Microsoft IT envisioned a social networking forum that would use and showcase the capabilities of the Windows 8 operating system, address some of the limitations of the existing support channels, and foster community spirit within Microsoft. Microsoft IT hoped a friendly, moderated forum would reduce the volume of help-desk calls while increasing the nontraditional feedback needed to drive improvements."
What else did Microsoft IT do to try to make Windows 8 deployment go more smoothly?
- Used IT Easy Installer to streamline the install experience by automating everything for the user to migrate to Windows 8. "We cut the install time in half, which included the Office image" installation, O'Rourke said.
- Provisioned 75 devices with Windows To Go (the Windows desktop on a stick) and made them available to senior staff, engineers, and architects. "Windows To Go scenarios include providing a managed corporate desktop when the host computers are unmanaged or not domain-joined," O'Rourke explained. "This deployment allowed different machines (slate, laptop, and desktop) with different configurations of screen, keyboard, and touch to have a machine-specific experience that was highly transportable between host machines."
- Used the File History feature built into Windows 8 to periodically scan Windows 8 users' file systems for changes stored in libraries and in the user's Desktop, Favorites, and Contacts folders and copying them to a Microsoft IT-managed network drive configured as their backup storage area. "Enterprise customers will be able to customize this solution for their own environment," O'Rourke said.
Not every IT shop will have the means or interest to build its own self-help desk. But for those interested in Windows 8 in any meaningful way, it might be worth considering....
Other tips and tricks you IT pro readers would suggest for those worrying about Windows 8 corporate deployments? (And skip the "just don't do it" comments. We already know many of you feel that way....)
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Just Pass On It
Just pass on you
You beat me to it
As did 99% of the people here.
I would rather say 100% of the people here think the same way
Sorry, you lose
Too bad for you I guess.
So sad...too bad.
Just Pass
I'm hardly in any 99 or 100% of people who will adopt Windows 8. We're passing.
?
I find this statement almost on every post about Win8. Ironically it is only "IT Pros" that say this. Have ANY of them even showed it to users? I took a laptop here at work, dropped the W8RP on it and took it to my most difficult users. It took them each a few minutes to get moving. They LOVED the new start screen. They where a bit confused the 1st time they pressed the start button. But once I told them that the start menu is now full screen and that the mouse still works the same (Bottom left for start) they where going full steam ahead.
We will not be going to Win 8 due to us just finishing the move to 7. However 8 is not NEARLY as bad as the doom sayers are making it out to be. Just as that so called "Y2K bug" that everyone freaked out about... yet my old 486DX2 was Y2K compliant...
They also said Win95 would be the end of MS and the rise of Linux...
Sorry, I have no issues with Win 8, in fact I can't wait for the Volume License to come so I can load it on my machine at work.
Anyway have fun. Fly Safe.
@IceQ: Good to see someone else here who gets it
The only conclusion I can come to is that some people would rather spend their days on forums like this, whining about how hard it is to learn anything new, instead of actually doing a little bit of work and trying to learn something new every once in awhile.
I'm just glad that the people I deal with in real life are nothing like the supposed "IT Pros" on these forums.
Rick
Religion
Same thing goes for tablets and everything else. It it works FOR YOU, enjoy it. If you have to use it for work, then deal with it whether you like it or not. If you hate it, tell Ballmer by not personally buying it. Everyone else can make their own decisions.
I have 250,000 desktops to deal with. 245,000 of them are still on XP because mission critical enterprise software doesn't yet work with IE 8, and Windows 7 can't load IE6 or 7. Nevermind my personal preference for Chrome, the fact that these commercial web plug-ins require Internet Explorer and aren't fully functional on version 8, let alone 9 or 10 means there won't be any fast upgrade to Windows 7 here and nearly guarantees that Windows 8 will be locked out entirely. Nevermind the need to retrain hundreds of thousands of non-technical employees who just need to get work done efficiently and can't if they aren't able to easily use the interface. Nevermind the cost to upgrade and having to justify the return on investment. Nevermind the over 2000 software applications we manage via electronic distribution that may have to be repackaged and re-QA tested and re-User Acceptance Tested to go on a new OS.
If you think resistance to a major OS change is because I'm a fanboy of an outdated interface and just need to get hip to the new interface formerly known as "Metro", then you are just not very knowledgeable about very large enterprise environments. You're probably a smart guy, but you don't know what you don't know.
Too bad for you I guess. :-)
Mission Critical
Lazy Shop
Again, you folks that glibly spew this crap out don't seem to know really big enterprise. I'm sure there are bigger shops than mine, but there are few that are as big, and few that are as regulated. You got 5,000 desktops? BFD. 30,000? OK, that's one region for me.
Well said
Maybe you can try Linux!!!
As for the general upgrade experience, once again Microsoft has delivered you 10 years of value from XP, that should be enough for any reaonable customer in a fast moving area like IT. Now it's time to move on because XP is finally reaching end-of-Microsoft-support-life and it's either Windows 7 or 8 from here.
Mr Foerster....
While I personally despise Microsoft and pretty much all of their products, they are the backbone of business world wide. While most days I would love to use my work station for skeet practice, I am really glad their software is difficult to administer and set up, job security :) .
I know no one that enjoys using Windows, it is like a necessary evil, they just want to get their work done so they can go home and use their iPad :)
Funny
Then why...
I understand there are a few cases in the world where this is true but the only way is to rewrite some code and that must just happen sooner or later. Changes can be always bought.
Despise Microsoft?
Rick
The CIO doesn't run the company!
Issue 1: State provides software for providing proof of compliance with state regulations. Software runs on DOS 5.0. Got that warehouse of older hardware to keep it running.
Issue 2: Multi-year project, 12 years, that is moving multiple systems across multiple divisions to a common platform. Discovered 1 year after project starts is that several of the portions to be replace in years 10-12 have software (required support apps) that require Win NT 4. (This is well after we deployed Win XP. But hey, if no one reports back that they have NT4 systems in a closet to manage their app it's hard for anyone to address.) At least the Win NT 4 Workstation VM works so no need to stockpile hardware.
Issue 3: Custom production line systems (from outside vendors) and testing equipment have software that run them which require an OS other than current. The business is not interest in spending the money to replace these working systems. The directive is to "keep them working." Note that the vendor may not exist anymore or they will not update the software for older systems.
Issue 4: Internal software update cycle of a major internal application which includes web access. It is done in modules with about 1/4 of the modules updated each year which means it takes 4 years to upgrade all of the components of the application. So Windows 7 comes out and it is 2 years before all the vendor supplied tools are upgraded. (No the business is not interested in paying for a rapid upgrade. Make it work.)
These are a some of the issues which are why we have older OSs or browser platforms (or other things) in use. But it all comes down to cost, cost, cost...
re mission critical
@JoeFoerster: Response
I have to wonder what people like you expect. Given that you cannot upgrade off of XP because you have vendor software that will not work properly, what do you expect the rest of the world to do? Should we all be stuck on XP forever, just because you can't upgrade? Should Microsoft not release ANY new software at all until the day you are ready to upgrade? Why do you expect the rest of the world to wait for you?
You know, my car is a few years old. But I am still very happy with my car. It still runs like new, doesn't have many miles on it, and it suits my needs in every respect. Do you think I go around to car forums telling everyone how all the newer car models suck, just because I am not ready to upgrade my car? Do you think I have to go to forums and cut down everyone who says the like the newer car models better than the older car model that I have, just because I can't afford to buy a new car right now?
I just don't get what it is about people who think everyone in the world has to be held back just because they are not ready to do something. If you can't upgrade off of XP, or you can't buy a new car, or a new TV or whatever, then just live with it. If other people are in a position to buy a new car, or a new TV, or a new OS for their computer, then let them do it, and live with it.
Rick
I will pass on it