Microsoft: OneCare should not have been rolled out

Summary: CeBIT: In an frank interview, Microsoft admits that its OneCare security product should not have been released so quickly

Microsoft has said that its OneCare security suite has "a problem" with the underlying antivirus code, and admitted that security is just "a little part of Microsoft".

Speaking to ZDNet UK exclusively at the CeBIT show in Hanover, a senior manager for the software giant said that its consumer security product is far from perfect and that pieces are actually "missing".

OneCare has been dogged by controversy since its launch last May. Signs that the software was not up to scratch came earlier this month when OneCare failed to achieve certification in an independent test of security products. Shortly before that, it emerged that the product did not sufficiently protect users of Microsoft's Vista operating system against malware.

But the latest and most serious problems arose in March this year after the product mistakenly quarantined and even deleted Outlook and Outlook Express files for the second time.

Read this

Leader

Leader: The slow poison of OneCare

Microsoft has failed to create a reliable product; it is irresponsible for it to market the result as the safer, more trustworthy package promised…

Read more

Microsoft apologised for the problems and has issued an update that has now been automatically pushed out to OneCare customers, to halt the false positive identification as malware of Outlook .pst and Outlook Express .dbx files.

Asked about these problems, Arno Edelmann, Microsoft's European business security product manager, told ZDNet UK on Thursday that the code itself has pieces missing.

"Usually Microsoft doesn't develop products, we buy products. It's not a bad product, but bits and pieces are missing," said Edelmann.

The problem lies with a core technology of OneCare, the GeCAD antivirus code, and how it interacts with Microsoft mailservers. According to Edelmann, the Microsoft updates and mailserver infrastructure do not harmonise.

"It's a problem with the updates, and it's a problem with the implementation," said Edelmann.

If mail is received from a server running Exchange 2007, users are unlikely to encounter problems. However, if mail is received from servers running Exchange 2000 or 2003, the likelihood of quarantining is high, said Edelmann.

"OneCare is a new product — they shouldn't have rolled it out when they did, but they're fixing the problems now," said Edelmann.

According to the security manager, security is only a small part of what Microsoft does, suggesting it does not have as much security expertise as established security vendors.

"Microsoft is not a security company. Security is important, but it's just a little part of Microsoft," said Edelmann.

Security vendor Kaspersky said that it was not acceptable for two Microsoft products — such as OneCare and Exchange 2007 — to be incompatible, especially as Microsoft has market dominance.

"Microsoft, welcome to our business," said Eugene Kaspersky, the founder of the company. "All in all it's a bad thing. It's not acceptable for Microsoft products to do that. Microsoft dominates the market. If they do that it creates a big noise, many affected people, and happy lawyers."

This is not the first time Microsoft has had a problem with OneCare and Outlook. In January OneCare also erroneously quarantined Outlook files. However, Kaspersky said that although the problems then and now were the same, the cause of the problems in January was different.

"They fixed the first false positive, and now they have the next one," said Kaspersky.

Kaspersky said that false positives are not just a problem for Microsoft, but for the whole antivirus industry. He said that about 1 percent of Kaspersky records were false positives, but they were almost totally stopped by the company's test robots. He added, however, that sometimes false positives are released by Kaspersky.

Microsoft purchased the Romanian GeCAD company's technology in 2003.

Topic: Security

About

Tom is a technology reporter for ZDNet.com. He covers the security beat, writing about everything from hacking and cybercrime to threats and mitigation. He also focuses on open source and emerging technologies, all the while trying to cut through greenwash.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

6 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • M$ Onecare

    "a little part of Microsoft".
    Security has always been an afterthought with M$ software.
    Users are the testers, and the victims.
    anonymous
  • Errors in the article

    1) Microsoft didn't buy GeCAD. Microsoft bought the Reliable (sometimes Romanian) AntiVirus (RAV) from GeCAD.
    2) I doubt that the problem lies with the "GeCAD" software. It used to be one of the leading AV software. The problem might lie in what Microsoft did with the code, or some of the new modules. It might be from the team that creates the signatures database, but I doubt that the problems that plague Microsoft OneCare, are somehow inherited from the RAV software, as it didn't have any such problems in the first place when it wasn't a Microsoft product.

    FYI, GeCAD's RAV was the leading AntiVirus for Non-Windows platforms before it was killed by Microsoft. Most Linux/Unix servers (mail/file/web, etc), that ran an AV software before the acquisition were running RAV. If you look on slashdot on the comments regarding the aquisition, you will see lots of administrators complaining about the fact that they were left without their favorite AV software for servers.
    d3vi1-8db08
  • GeCAD clarification

    The story as it was indicated that Microsoft acquired the whole of GeCAD - when in fact it only bought the IP and technology assets - as you rightly point out.

    We have amended the story to make that clear.

    thanks

    Andrew Donoghue
    Executive Editor
    Andrew Donoghue
  • thanks for putting the dots on the i's ..

    I do remember RAV ..
    http://www.ravantivirus.com/
    mad-man
  • Usually Microsoft doesn't develop products, we buy stuff ..

    "to halt the false positive identification as malware of Outlook files"

    why? it seems to me that microsoft is finally admitting that at least some of its software is in fact malware ..

    "Usually Microsoft doesn't develop products, we buy products. It's not a bad product, but bits and pieces are missing"

    Yes, we know that, however why is Bill Gates telling the rest of the clueless world that microsoft is an innovating company ??

    - mad-man -
    mad-man
  • M$ Onecare

    GeCAD is a leading software development company from Romania.

    Since 2003, it focuses on innovative messaging solutions by developing and distributing Axigen Mail Server worldwide.

    You can read more about them at:
    http://www.axigen.com/
    Tomcat-172d0