Minchin may stall NBN legislation

Summary: Shadow Minister for Communications, Nick Minchin, late yesterday threatened to hold up legislation required for the National Broadband Network roll-out unless the Labor party releases the initial NBN expert report.

Shadow Communications Minister Nick Minchin late yesterday threatened to hold up legislation required for the National Broadband Network roll-out unless the Labor party released the initial NBN expert report.

Minchin yesterday accused Communications Minister Stephen Conroy of being in contempt of the Senate for not producing the NBN expert panels' report covering the initial $4.7 billion plan, and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission's report on the NBN proposals to the NBN Panel of Experts.

The Shadow Minister handed Conroy an ultimatum of 6:50pm yesterday to table the reports, threatening that unless they were revealed, consideration of any legislation relating to the new $43 billion NBN proposal would be postponed.

Conroy has maintained the stance that the government cannot release the documents due to commercially sensitive information it contained, likely relating to network infrastructure belonging to telco giants like Telstra and Optus.

"The government cannot and will not comply with this irresponsible ultimatum," Conroy said in a statement. "The Opposition continues to seek to opportunistically delay the roll-out of high-speed broadband to support Australia's future businesses and services, despite endorsing investment in economic infrastructure."

"The release of this commercially sensitive information by the government would be irresponsible," Conroy said. "Senator Minchin's behaviour is grossly irresponsible." Furthermore, Conroy added, Minchin's demands were hypocritical given he had withheld similar reports while in government during the Howard administration.

Topics: Broadband, Government AU, Telcos, NBN

Liam Tung

About Liam Tung

Liam Tung is an Australian business technology journalist living a few too many Swedish miles north of Stockholm for his liking. He gained a bachelors degree in economics and arts (cultural studies) at Sydney's Macquarie University, but hacked (without Norse or malicious code for that matter) his way into a career as an enterprise tech, security and telecommunications journalist with ZDNet Australia. These days Liam is a full time freelance technology journalist who writes for several Australian publications, including the Sydney Morning Herald online. He's interested primarily in how information technology impacts the way business and people communicate, trade, and consume.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

11 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Conroy promised to released

    Conroy did promise to release the report once it was complete. He is now saying he wont release the report because it contains commercially sensitive information. Why doesn't just release a redacted version that removes the commercially sensitive information.

    Or is it that the report does show a winner but this did not align with his political goals/masters
    anonymous
  • Bad promise, tight spot.

    If he submitted a redacted one they would have a crack at him for hiding information. There is no real way to win that one.

    He shouldnt have made the promised to release all the information in the first place, and instead promised to release a summary of the findings.

    Either way, the report probably will show a winner, but the overall recommendation would be that none were viable. If that was not the recommendation of the expert panel one would have said something by now.
    anonymous
  • Of course there was a winner

    The report probably did show a winner. hence the reluctance to release it.

    However, if the government doesn't control the new NBN, how else can they enforce their suspension of freedom of speech with their top secret blacklist?

    Most of the ISPs have proven the filter is a waste of time and money, but that won’t stop the lobby groups pushing for it to be mandatory if you sign up to the new 100 mbps connections. I can't wait til all Australian children are forced to learn Intelligent Design rather than Evolution at school!
    anonymous
  • ah the selective libertarian

    Funny how there are more civil libertarians out of the woodwork now the Rudd government has been elected.
    They didn't speak out against the detention of asylum seekers which denied basic legal rights. They didn't make much of a fuss about the detention and execution of Australians overseas.
    The fact is the Howard government stacked the film and literature classification board with church interests - banning more films for distribution than in any period of history.

    Speaking of Intelligent Design - it was Brendan Nelson as education minister who proposed that it be taught in science classes.
    But to the selective libertarian with amnesia it doesn't matter.
    anonymous
  • Hear hear

    Hear hear
    anonymous
  • Free speech is democratic, not "libertarian"

    Something seems to have upset Davoe and Jason. It can't be the reference to intelligent design, aka creationism, because they don't sound very intelligent.

    Every Australian should be protesting about the lies we are being fed by Conroy and Rudd about their plan to filter the Net. Well meaning but technically ignorant people will listen to the Hollowmen spin about saving all the children, and foolishly will stop watching their kids when they are online.

    Meanwhile the government will secretly put on the secret banned list whatever it wants to, with no public scrutiny or review. And of course they will look to collect votes from people like Davoe and Jason, who probably can't even spell "right to free speech" ;-)
    gfrend
  • and

    and howard was perfect, hey, intellectual super guy? get off your high horse.
    anonymous
  • Free speech is democratic, not "libertarian"

    A lot of things that are intelligent, upsets those two clowns. You just have to learn to live with it.
    anonymous
  • Conroy's report would show his ineptitude !

    "Conroy has maintained the stance that the government cannot release the documents due to commercially sensitive information.........................."

    IMHO, that is bulldust. I reckon he has no worthwhile information to report, and that release of the documents will only confirm his inept handling of the NBN fiasco, and what he has to offer in the "expert report".
    anonymous
  • ineptitude?

    why is it a fiasco? he has commited to an aus owned and built nbn, with equal access to all isps. isn't that what you wanted?

    it may seem like a fiasco to you, if you support telstra and their own arrogant approach means they had to show sol the door early and now suck up to the government. that was their own fault, a calculated gamble which backfired.

    conroy said he would disclose the docs following the announcement of the wiiner and there hasn't been a winner, regardless of his ineptitude or not.
    anonymous
  • re ineptitude?

    Maybe, but I would like to see his docs nevertheless if only to prove he is not the idiot that a lot of people seem to think he is. I really don't think he has anything worth showing.
    anonymous