MSI launches WS60 laptop, claims thinnest, lightest mobile workstation title

MSI launches WS60 laptop, claims thinnest, lightest mobile workstation title

Summary: The new notebook weighs 4.36 pounds and is less than 0.8 inches thick, but comes with the heft of a $2,299.99 starting price.

TOPICS: Mobility, Laptops

While mobile workstations are designed to have the beefy specs necessary to do creative work on the go, they're not immune to the thinner and lighter demands that have gripped all laptops. In the race to produce the sveltest system, MSI thinks it can wear the crown with its new WS60 notebook, though who knows how long it will hold onto the title. 

At 4.36 pounds and less than 0.8 inches thick, the WS60 is currently the thinnest, lightest mobile workstation, at least according to MSI. (HP, in fact, could dispute the claim altogether, given that its ZBook 14 mobile workstation is a 3.57-pound Ultrabook, though its ZBook 15 is thicker and heavier than the WS60.) The company has built the chassis entirely from metal and based its design on the gaming laptops for which MSI is probably better known. Other items borrowed from the world of gaming are a built-in Killer Game Networking chip for speedier online connectivity and a SteelSeries backlit keyboard.

Despite its meager weight and dimensions, the WS60 is still a workstation, with the components needed for video editors and CAD engineers to complete their tasks. Both configurations going on sale feature the Intel Core i7-4710HQ Haswell processor, 16GB of RAM, and Nvidia's Quadro K2100M graphics card. The base model comes with a 128GB solid-state drive and 1TB hard drive and 1,920x1,080 15.6-inch display, while the pricier version includes an additional SSD in RAID configuration and a 2,880x1,620 (or "3K") screen. Ports include a trio of USB 3.0 inputs, HDMI connection, and a Thunderbolt 2 port.

Between the super-slim design and high-end specs, one thing that is definitely not diminuitive about the WS60 is the pricing. The base configuration will set you back $2,299.99, whereas the souped-up edition costs $300 more. Chalk it up to the price you pay to own the world's thinnest and lightest of something.     

Topics: Mobility, Laptops

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • 3K ??

    I do not see how you can call that a 3K screen. 1920*1.5=2880 and 1080*1.5=1620 so basically it has 50% more pixels in each direction. If you count pixels you will find it has 2.25 more pixels than a standard screen. I think more appropriately it would be a 2.25K screen.
    It does not even make 3K pixels across as some older specs have used the K designation.

    I have one of these 15" screens on my Sony Flip Hybrid. For well behaved programs like those from Microsoft Office that auto scale it is marvelous, amazing, astounding, astonishing, awesome, breathtaking, sensational, remarkable, spectacular, etc. I can use it for hours and my eyes never get tired. For many programs that are based solely on pixel coordinates it really sucks. Even some popular programs like Abode Acrobat get messed at times. You would be surprised at how many things do not work well. Things running in a browser tend to work better than those running directly. It really shows how some programs and behind the state of the art or maybe just have lazy programmers.

    It is really a love/hate relationship. In total I change my mind every day whether I like it or not. Sometimes I change my mind every hour.
    • You're just wrong.

      The "K" still refers to the number of pixels across. The change is that rounding is now allowed due to the differences in aspect ratios.