My phone is bigger than yours. So what?
Summary: Hardware specs are dead. Comparing these between different phones is pointless, when we should be looking at what matters more.
It's time we declare hardware specifications dead.
The my-screen-is-bigger-than-your-screen or my-processor-is-faster-than-your-processor comparisons are irrelevant now, thanks primarily to Apple's sustained efforts to speak only about their own specifications or to gloss over them entirely.
Kristian Tuomikumpu created a spec sheet comparing the Nokia Lumia 920's specifications with the iPhone 5's specs. It's modeled after Samsung's spec sheet comparing the Galaxy S3 against the iPhone. The Lumia 920 trumps the iPhone 5 in pretty much everything: screen size, resolution, battery life, media file format support, cloud storage, and so on.
Here's my question: does it matter?
As a geek, I wish it did. But it doesn't. Until one of these manufacturers comes up with a revolutionary hardware change, these annual incremental changes mean nothing in terms of comparing different phones.
Here are a few of the major specs that people like to compare across phones:
Screen size. 4" versus 4.2" versus 4.5"--if you really care about screen size, you'll use a tablet for the next size up.
Screen resolution. Retina blah blah, PureMotion HD+ display, you can't tell a difference.
Standby time. I'd like to meet someone who actually has a smartphone that isn't charged before it has hit even 100 hours of standby time, let alone 225 hours.
Talk time. 8 hours versus 10 hours versus your battery is going to die from all the WhatsApping and Web browsing first
Megapixels. It's fine for your amateur photo skills and if you have Instagram then even better. You're not a Pulitzer-prize winning photographer.
Front-facing camera. Aside from self-pictures is anyone actually using these for Facetime or video calls?
LED flash. You know what's worse than shaky camera photos? Any taken with LED flash.
Siri/TellMe/Any voice command capability. You end up yelling at your phone in frustration regardless of the model.
So what are the things to focus on when comparing phones? The scenarios the operating system allows and the applications available.
Examples would be the way social networks are meshed together on Windows Phone, the sheer number of useful apps on iPhone, and the customizability of Android phones.
Why bother talking about specs?
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Hold It In Your Hand, And Try It
If you’re going to use your phone as a media player, then you need a platform that doesn’t impose irritating restrictions, like only allowing you to copy media files from your PC to the phone, but not the other way.
If you want to have your choice of apps, then you want a platform that doesn’t tie you to only getting those apps from one channel.
In short, I’m sure Apple’s walled garden is very beautiful—if you ignore what’s outside it. If you compare it to how powerful and flexible Android is in the real, unwalled world, then you see how far Apple has to go to catch up.
Compromise
Regarding everything about platform - yep, that's definitely a differentiator. A software differentiator and not hardware specification.
Double compromise
According to Apple 640p is also HD... Apparently if you can stuff 326 ppi on a 1-inch diagonal stamp-size screen it would still be HD "Retina Display".
For Apple, spec isn't just unimportant. It's more than important and can be used for spinning.
Just a thought:
Bigger Screen...
Looks like, Design...
...but that's subjective, I liked the minimal colors and thinness of the new iPhone (YEAH BLACK) but something about a Red Lumia draws me into it. Android phones pretty much has alot of design/colors to choose from.
My phone is bigger than yours. So what?
A larger screen on a phone is not better
Yeah we know
Unless you are a true itard, no one would claim the media experience is better on an ibrick compared to an S2 or S3 or 1X. Oh but that doesn't matter because *fill in the blank with your own ibrick excuses*.
I do understand that those with freakish elf hands can't get full thumb swipe but that's mainly because they're going from a postage stamp screen. Give it a few minutes and it's easy to adjust to.
Can't Agree
I don't care how "great" a device is claimed to be, if it cannot meet my needs, it is a no go.
Somehow, when I have a spec of 4"+ for a screen, vertical stretch only isn't what I had in mind.
Usage scenarios
Which applies to the market outside apple
A lot of ibrick buyers will already have some apple ecosystem buy-in so are they doing anything different to anyone else?
Right
Sales?
My point isn't to say one phone is better than the other. It's a general statement about how in the current generation smartphone battle the hardware specs are significantly less important of a comparison point than the software / usability.
Re: The iPhone leads the pack in sales.
sales cliff
Re: sales cliff
It's still record sales again,
The reason I think for Android to be popular have a lot to do with the $200-300 Android phones. In China for example, Android phones starts at under $100 USD (no contracts) and 30-45 million Android phone was sold in China alone.
Re: Android's Q2 sales in the US have fallen ...
Sales...
— Android (Google Inc.) — 104.8 million units, 68.1 percent share (46.9 percent a year earlier)
— iOS (Apple Inc.'s iPhone) — 26.0 million units, 16.9 percent share (18.8 percent a year earlier)
BTW, if Android sales have slowed down any it's because the One X & Galaxy S3 are devices that have a longer term viability. Why would you go buy the newest Sony or any other Android device if you have either of these devices? Plus Apple could sell 50 Million of the iPhone 5, they still aren't catching Android.