Net-based services like WhatsApp are replacing SMS among the under 35s, says Analysys Mason

Net-based services like WhatsApp are replacing SMS among the under 35s, says Analysys Mason

Summary: Younger smartphone users prioritse data over voice because they're moving to IP-based messaging services such as WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger and Skype, according to a multi-country survey by Analysys Mason

SHARE:
1

Smartphone owners under the age of 35 have "vastly different usage patterns and attitudes towards mobile voice and messaging services in comparison with the rest of the population", according to a new multi-country survey by Analysys Mason. Older users want more voice minutes, while younger ones want more data. This is because many users aged 18 to 24 are adopting IP-based services such as WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger and Skype in preference to SMS. These services have the advantage because they are free to use over Wi-Fi.

"Part of it is price sensitivity: it's cheaper to message than talk," says Stephen Sale, author of the report and principal analyst for Analysys Mason's Voice and Messaging research programme.

graph showing preference for voice or data, by age
Looking for more voice or more data, by age. Image: Analysys Mason

As the graph here (right and below) shows, data is most important to smartphone buyers aged 18-34, and not very appealing to those over 55. Interestingly, users from all the age groups now rate SMS messaging lower than either voice or data.

These preferences suggest mobile carriers should segment their offerings by age and tailor some packages for the youth market. However, "operators will note that despite the high penetration levels of IP-based alternatives, full messaging service substitution has not yet occurred. Operators should continue to embed the use of SMS in customer’s behaviour, particularly with younger users, by offering unlimited messaging plans," says Sale.

Graph showing use of IP-based messaging by country and by age
Use of IP-based messaging by country and by age. Image: Analysys Mason

Messaging is particularly strong in Spain, where more than 70% of the 18-24 group use an IP-based service. Spain is followed by Germany and the UK, where more than 50 percent use these services. IP-based messaging is not as popular with the 18-24 group in the USA -- roughly a third use them -- but takes off with 25-34 year olds. However, use of these services falls off dramatically with age.

Sale says WhatsApp is very strong in Spain and not as strong in the USA. He says: "WhatsApp has really taken some markets by storm. It integrates into the address book really well, which makes it easy to get up and running."

Skype and Facebook messaging also work across platforms, and are "doing quite well". By contrast, "platform-specific services score quite low," says Sale, with BlackBerry Messenger and Apple's iMessage in the single digits. However, Sale adds, "lots of people use iMessage without knowing it."

Skype and Windows Messenger carried over from the PC and they have given Microsoft "a serious position in this market," according to Sale. However, he sees Skype falling behind WhatsApp, perhaps because text messaging is still much more popular on smartphones than video or VoIP (Voice over IP). The report says: "VoIP usage remains relatively limited and its even distribution across countries suggests that the conditions for mass-market adoption on smartphones do not currently exist."

The growth of BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) could drive the use of WhatsApp into the corporate market, but it's not clear whether the 18-24 group will adopt the entrenched business communications systems, including Skype and email, instead.

Messaging services can be somewhat transitory -- ICQ and AOL Messenger used to be big, for example -- and WhatsApp's success could be ephemeral. However, it is doing deals with carriers, and it could get taken over by one of the major players. If not, Sale reckons it could survive by charging users $1 or $2 per year. "The costs of IP-based messaging services can be minuscule," he says. (WhatsApp iPhone app costs 99 cents in the US.)

WhatsApp now has more than 250 million active users, which puts it about half way between Twitter and Skype. This is small compared with SMS, which is supplied as standard on billions of phones, but users of IP-based messaging services are more prolific. A week ago, WhatsApp announced a new daily record of more than 10 billion messages sent and 17 billion received: "27 billion messages handled in just 24 hours!" That's 40 messages sent per user per day.

In the longer term, WhatsApp and similar services could be challenged by Joyn: the common IP-based messaging service being developed by the GSM Association and carriers such as Vodafone, Telefonica and Deutsche Telekom.

The Connected Consumer Survey 2013: Voice and Messaging is based on an online survey of 6,610 representative consumers aged 18+ in France, Germany, Poland, Spain, the UK and the USA. It costs $4,999. Contact research@analysysmason.com

Masons-Fig 7, slide 10-voice v data (600 x 227)
Masons-Fig 16, slide 20--age country (600 x 545)

 

Topics: Mobility, Smartphones

Jack Schofield

About Jack Schofield

Jack Schofield spent the 1970s editing photography magazines before becoming editor of an early UK computer magazine, Practical Computing. In 1983, he started writing a weekly computer column for the Guardian, and joined the staff to launch the newspaper's weekly computer supplement in 1985. This section launched the Guardian’s first website and, in 2001, its first real blog. When the printed section was dropped after 25 years and a couple of reincarnations, he felt it was a time for a change....

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

1 comment
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Future of messaging platforms.

    Very Insightful bog Jack. Thanks a lot. What do you think about platforms like Whats app getting integrated with B2C systems where in today SMS/text is present as notification/engagement channel for a customer? Have you come across any such integrations?
    deshmukhanup@...