madison

Apple sues power adapter knockoff maker

Jim Dalrymple CNET News | November 30, 2009 4:06 AM PST

Summary

Hot on the heels of its win against Mac clone-maker Psystar, Apple is suing another company that's making knockoffs of its products, but this time its power adapters.
Hot on the heels of its win against Mac clone-maker Psystar, Apple is suing another company that's making knockoffs of its products, but this time its power adapters.

Apple filed the lawsuit against Media Solutions Holdings in the California Central District Court on Monday, according to InformationWeek. Apple claims the power adapters violate a patent the company holds on the design of its own adapters.

The power adapters in question come with Apple's MacBook and MacBook Pro line of notebooks. Apple also sells the adapters separately for $79 from its online and retail stores.

For more, read "Apple sues power adapter knockoff maker" at CNET News.

Talkback Most Recent of 30 Talkback(s)

  • Gah!!!
    Our patent system is a mess. "I patent supplying 20V DC to your laptop!!! muwahahahahaha!!!!"
    ZDNet Gravatar
    gtvr
    30th Nov 2009
  • If you follow the link...
    backwards about 5 times, you'll find the patent in question:

    http://www.google.com/patents?
    id=h7cOAAAAEBAJ&printsec=abstract&zoom=4&source=gbs_overvie
    w_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q=&f=false


    It's a design patent, which covers the look of the adaptor.

    Check this out, and see what you think:

    http://www.informationweek.com/galleries/showImage.jhtml?
    galleryID=326&imageID=136&articleID=221901168
    ZDNet Gravatar
    msalzberg
    30th Nov 2009
  • So change the looks then
    Put heat disappation fins on it or make it look like something from Alien or Star Trek.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Dr_Zinj
    30th Nov 2009
  • You're correct.
    Unfortunately, if you look at the items in question, they are exact
    duplicates of Apple's power supplies, which are protected by US Design
    Patent number D478,310 S.

    That's the problem.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    msalzberg
    30th Nov 2009
  • I stand corrected
    Other stuff is still a mess though wink
    ZDNet Gravatar
    gtvr
    30th Nov 2009
  • RE: Apple sues power adapter knockoff maker
    Wow...IMHO it appears Apple has a slam-dunk case here. Even from a foot away you really can't tell the difference. It's like a 100% copy of Apple's powersupply including the cable winding and the snap-in adapter. Pretty blatent copy job.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    lawryll@...
    30th Nov 2009
  • Yeah...
    Yeah. The only noticeable difference is that there's no Apple logo on the
    side. Physically, the connector is a little different. It's lacking a second
    dip on the connector which prevents the Apple brand connectors from
    working on the generic brand adapter.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    olePigeon
    30th Nov 2009
  • Awe man...
    Awe man, I just bought about 10 of these to replace
    lost/stolen/broken adapters on our laptop carts.

    They're really cheap an they work well enough. The only
    down side is that the extension cable doesn't fit in the
    generic brand adapters, but that's a small tradeoff.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    olePigeon
    30th Nov 2009
  • RE: Apple sues power adapter knockoff maker
    Not sure you can patent looks. That's more a copyright issue.

    It's a good job it's not Microsoft eh? Really, the differential treatment Apple receives compared with the Seattle Satan is remarkable.

    If Microsoft tried half the strokes Apple pulls with its marketing (irreplaceable batteries anyone?) they'd be in court every waking hour.

    It's about time someone took a long, cold look at Apple and their prediliction for uncompetitive, market killing practices.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    brian.smith@...
    30th Nov 2009
  • You most certainly can patent looks.
    It's called a design patent. From the US Patent and Trademark Office
    site:

    "A design consists of the visual ornamental characteristics embodied
    in, or applied to, an article of manufacture. Since a design is
    manifested in appearance, the subject matter of a design patent
    application may relate to the configuration or shape of an article, to
    the surface ornamentation applied to an article, or to the combination
    of configuration and surface ornamentation...The Patent Law provides
    for the granting of design patents to any person who has invented any
    new, original and ornamental design for an article of manufacture. A
    design patent protects only the appearance of the article and not its
    structural or utilitarian features. "

    The key phrase, and the way it differs from copyright, is "an article of
    manufacture." You do not manufacture books, paintings, music, or
    software code. They get copyrights.

    The patent in question, by the way, is US Design Patent number
    D478,310 S.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    msalzberg
    30th Nov 2009
  • Anti-competitive actions
    There's a big difference between MS and Apple, though: MS has an effective monopoly, while Apple does not. The rules are different for monopolies than they are for other companies.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    dkerber@...
    30th Nov 2009
  • Come on, give Apple a break
    They can't innovate anything other than the looks
    of a power adapter. If you took that away from
    Apple, they would have nothing left. sad
    ZDNet Gravatar
    NonZealot
    30th Nov 2009
  • Consider 9% vs. 90%
    And you'll see why Apple gets a pass. I can assure you that if Apple had M$'s desktop market share, the situation would be reversed.

    It's a good job it's not Microsoft eh? Really, the differential treatment Apple receives compared with the Seattle Satan is remarkable.

    ~

    It's about time someone took a long, cold look at Apple and their prediliction for uncompetitive, market killing practices.

    It's relatively easy for the end user to avoid using anything designed or built by Apple. Can we really say the same for Micro$oft? wink
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Wintel BSOD
    30th Nov 2009
  • Apple may have trouble proving its claims
    Unless the patents Apple is relying upon to give it a monopoly on power supplies are truely innovative and useful, they're going be dissappointed. Redesigning a power supply connector for the sole purpose of having a monopoly on the power source for your product only buys you a little time before the clone makers step in.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    LarryPTL
    30th Nov 2009
  • You're missing the point completely.
    Apple has a design patent on their laptop power supplies. Go to
    the US Patent and Trademark Office and look up US Design Patent
    number D478310.

    And, yes, that gives them the power to block anyone from making a
    power supply that looks the same. That's what a design patent is
    for
    ZDNet Gravatar
    msalzberg
    30th Nov 2009

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity