Ballmer takes on Google, the economy and Windows 7
Summary
Topics
"The fact of the matter is, this is not a downturn, this is a bit of a reset. Those are quite different and we're trying to really suss through what we think that means for us," Ballmer said in an interview with CNET News.com's Ina Fried on Thursday, a day after delivering the keynote address at the conference (Check out ZDNet's Special Report.
Ballmer talked about what the "reset" will mean for Microsoft, as well as lessons learned from Vista and Microsoft's move to put Office on the web. When it comes to what worries him, most days it's still Google, although he concedes he has had to spend more time recently on economic issues and making sure Microsoft makes the adjustments it needs to. He wouldn't go into detail on what (and who) Microsoft plans to cut, but it is clear that some changes are coming.
The following is an edited version of that interview:
CNET News: Obviously, Microsoft didn't necessarily get everything it might have hoped for in terms of the critical response for Vista. What are you guys planning to do differently with Windows 7
Ballmer: Well, I think we made some choices in Vista to improve security at the kind of expense, if you will, of compatibility. With Windows 7, we're able to build compatibly off of Vista and really sort of just tune, if you will, the user interface, the performance, and at the end of the day, it'll be what the users think of the product that we're building, and we'll start getting beta feedback this week.
Q: How hard are you pushing the team to get Windows 7 out this year?
Ballmer: I'm not pushing the team hard, the team is pushing itself. They set some goals and objectives and of course we'll ship the product when it's--as I said last night--both right and ready and when we know when that is, we'll share that.
Q: One of the biggest parts of the PC business that's really taken off amid an, obviously, challenging time overall is the Netbook segment. What has that meant for Microsoft both in terms of the technology, but also from a business standpoint? How does that impact you?
Ballmer: Well, we've done very well on Netbooks. When they first came out, I'm not sure if people knew whether they were PCs or something else, and I think everybody kind of understands now that a Netbook is a small-form-factor, low-cost personal computer. And we're doing very well with Windows XP, which fits. Vista does not fit, and we're working hard to make sure Windows 7 fits very well on the Netbooks.
You know, from a business perspective, low-cost machine means a little less revenue per unit to Microsoft, but I think it gives us an opportunity to see expansion of the overall PC market.
Q: Obviously, everything that you're talking about here at CES comes against the backdrop of a very challenging economy. What does that economy mean to Microsoft and its plans?
Ballmer: Well, I think there's two ways to take a look at it: First, what's going to happen to let's call it revenue in our industry? Revenue will be lower in aggregate in our industry than it would have been, and that will (affect) Microsoft, Cisco--you name the company--Intel. We'll all be affected by that.
With that said, the pace of innovation in our business will not change. The opportunity there won't change. And so the key is: how do we right-size a little bit as an industry, and that means different things to different companies to adjust to the fact that revenues will be lower. And yet at the same time, keep a strong push on the R&D that's going to power the future. And each company will discuss its plans. We're kind of in a quiet period, so I don't have much to say about that.
Q: Turning to search, that's obviously a key area for Microsoft. You announced a couple of partnership deals that will get you some more distribution, but clearly there aren't enough distribution deals out there to make the kind of headway you need to make against Google. What else does Microsoft need to really be a serious competitor to Google?
Ballmer: Just keep working. I mean, look, this is not something that changes overnight. Everybody wants us to snap our fingers. We have a good competitor, and yet at the same time, we see real opportunities to improve the search experience, to differentiate, but it's not going to happen overnight. We're going to have to keep working and working; innovating product-wise, marketing, branding, distribution, and we're going to have to be patient about it.
I like our new release. We're making two releases a year. We continue to attract great talent, which lets us do interesting things. Our cash-back program has some early promise in terms of what I call business model differentiation versus Google, but we'll continue to work.
Q:: Fair to say four years in, though, you would have hoped you'd made more progress in market share?
Ballmer: Maybe. Maybe. I'm not sure that would have been anything other than na?ve because the market leader is a strong company. And we're going to have to keep at it.
Q: You have said that while you're not interested in buying all of Yahoo, you would be open to some sort of a search deal. How likely do you think that is?
Ballmer: No way to handicap it. I think at this stage, it's probably fair to say I'm not even sure Yahoo would handicap it. They're out doing a search for a new CEO and we'll just have to wait and see how all that shakes out.
Q: You said a little while ago that there weren't any active discussions, is that still the case?
Ballmer: Yeah. I think probably fair for us not to comment too much.
Q: We've talked about Google, we've talked about the economy. Which actually occupies more of your time in terms of which do you spend your time worrying about?
Ballmer: Well in general, the answer is: Google, Google, Google, Google, Google. Now, the truth of the matter is, for a period of time of a couple of months, we do have to go through and say, OK, what do we really think this economic thing is, is it a year thing or is it a reset, and then we build from a new base, and how do we parse and act on the consequences?
So there's a little bubble period in here where I'd say I'm spending a little bit more time. But in general, I can't control the economy. We can drive and control and affect our competitive position, so the lion's share of my energy would be there.
Q: Microsoft, in the past, has been able to get through even some, you know, typical economic downturns by kind of trimming at the edges. Is it fair to say that whatever you have to do this time, it'll be more significant than anything you've had to do before?
Ballmer: It's premature to comment. I mean, the fact of the matter is, this is not a downturn, this is a bit of a reset. Those are quite different and we're trying to really suss through what we think that means for us.
Q: One of the biggest changes coming in the Office side of things is the fact that individuals and companies will soon be able to access Office over the Web. What doors does that open?
Ballmer: There's two aspects: One aspect is sort of the notion of can I get access to the software when I'm not at my own computer, and you'll get access to some stuff when you're not at your own computer. That's nice. People want the full capabilities, generally. The second thing is: do we provide better and better facilities for people to collaborate from within the productivity environment? And I think that's a bigger deal, and you'll see us do both of those--push both of those themes in the new Office release.
It's important to do, it enables some new scenarios, but I don't just say, "Oh, isn't it great, I can run Excel in a browser, or a subset of Excel in a browser." I'm not quite sure that that in and of itself is a breakthrough. Google and people want to run around, "Ooo. Ahh. Woo," you know--I don't quite understand that.
Q: It's been few months since Bill (Gates) switched from full-time work to working with the foundation. Any surprises in terms of what that's meant or what has it meant in terms of changes for Microsoft?
Ballmer: I don't think anything all that surprising. You know, I think we're trying to get settled now in a rhythm. Bill and I see each other, you know, we have a regularly scheduled lunch, there's board meetings, he has a regularly scheduled meeting with a couple of the internal groups. I think he's figuring out how he spends his time. But I don't think any real surprises.
Q: Is it a little weird to be giving the CES keynote? Obviously, you give a lot of big speeches.
Ballmer: Yeah, I mean, yeah, for some reason, it had that oeuvre, and yet like I say, last night I went back to my room and said, "That was actually a much easier speech to give than many others." I wonder why I was thinking that that would be a hard one to do.
Q: In terms of the economy and what that means, what are the kinds of things that are least impacted inside Microsoft and what are the kinds of things that do pretty well?
Ballmer: You mean what'll sell and what won't sell? I think PCs are going to sell a little less well, which means Windows will sell a little less well. I think servers--because capital spending will get hit, servers will sell a little less well, which has got to affect servers. Now, we still are taking share in the server business overall, so I don't know what that'll mean for our overall results. Phones, Web, those things ought to all be growth opportunities for us.
Q: Do you think this reset, as you called it, will force Microsoft to get out of some things that you've been doing?
Ballmer: I'd say at the macro level, the same things that we've been doing. At the micro level, I'm sure there will be some things where we have this many people and, you know, we might right size, or maybe we're expecting to go to this many people (moves his hands in to show a smaller level of growth)... I think that's more likely; to stay more flat on some of the projects. You know, there will be things that may not make as much sense. I don't know. We'll have to see how that all comes together.
Talkback Most Recent of 32 Talkback(s)
-
Ballmer is a Dolt.
An Idiot, plain and simple.
I can't believe people give him the time of day, including MS's board of directors.
itguy089th Jan 2009 -
Re: Ballmer is a Dolt.
That is a very intelligent reply
mKind9th Jan 2009 -
Thank you.
NM
itguy089th Jan 2009 -
Yup, he just talks ****.
They produce ****, the Directors talk ****, and idiots buy the ****.
The reset is basically that I.T. illiterates are now completely fed up with Microsoft too.
Amelioration12th Jan 2009 -
Economy is going to tank in 2009
With all of the new wonderful taxes on oil, coal burning powerplants that will be put in place with our new socialist at the helm of the country I am sure Windows 7 will be flying off the shelves...
With the demise of companies slashing jobs like popcorn, and barely hanging on new cpu/memory hog operating systems will be a companies last worry.
Looks like the XP Pro linage is going to survive and MS Office may be replaced with Open Office if times get really rough...
Christian_<><9th Jan 2009 -
How many times has this garbage been posted??
Not again! We've been hearing misguided open source advocates predicting the demise of Microsoft for nearly 20 years now. I think the only thing predicted more often by zealots during this time is the end of the world by religious fanatics. Don't they have forums somewhere where these people can get together and share their misconceived ideas among themselves without taking up space where legitimate dialogue is preferred?
Tiggster9th Jan 2009 -
Gee.. You mean by the new Troll on the Block?
He seems to pop up pretty on pretty much EVERY post on ZDNet I've read in the last few days. And it's usually some variation of the same doom and gloom crap.
Wolfie2K312th Jan 2009 -
Not really
Most companies pay only one flat fee to use windows and office for all users. Even if companies did pay full cost for software, that cost would be negligible in comparison to salaries, payroll taxes, healthcare, etc.
hamobu-2233313613951877348168551412881212th Jan 2009 -
Change for changes sake is expensive
so will companies CONTINUE to throw good money after bad?
MS stuff is over-hyped and under-delivered ****. Always has been, always will be. Their only concern is feeding the greedy.
Amelioration13th Jan 2009 -
Well the good news is
the rich and greedy can stay rich and greedy - and be fed by the poor via "bailouts".
Amelioration12th Jan 2009 -
More? So if everyone that is considered rich is greedy.....
that must mean everyone that is poor is lazy and wants everything given to them instead?
You bring such a bright and thoughtful touch to the world. Bless you.
xuniL_z12th Jan 2009 -
Correct.
People that stack money covet money!
Money is worth nothing until you spend it.
Economies will become about moving the money around so that everybody wins, rather than a few show offs who want to go around stamping on others.
That might be a hard concept for you. Are you American? Do you carry body fat around?
Amelioration13th Jan 2009 -
Another ridiculous statement AND a stereotype. You are a real.....
winner.
People that stack money covet money!
Well, let's say i borrowed 10,000 to buy Microsoft stock around 1990. Do you know how much that much money, invested then, is worth today? Now supposing I did that, would you call taking 10,000.00 and letting it sit around for 12 years, when it became worth over 25 million "worth nothing"?
You see, companies that carry a balance of cash are making money as it just sits there. That is their choice as it would be your choice if you were ambitious and talented enough to own your own business.
I keep a balance as well, for unforseen emergencies and for future purchases and developement. If I were not in need of anything in my company at any given time, yet went out and spent every dime of my reserves, I would have done nothing but bought a bunch of junk I don't need, now wouldn't have I? That would be absurbly ignorant.
I give a good share of money to charity, but I do it because I want to, not because my way of government forces me to.
About your stereotyping of Americans. Are you always that much of an ignorant person?
Are you European? Do you bathe more than once a month? Do you still have all of your teeth and how far along is the rotting? Do you lie around like a bum and make your living from other people's toil?
Are those the types of questions I should be asking you?
YOu see the inappropriate and asinine nature of your comment now?
xuniL_z13th Jan 2009 -
Open Source has seen a surge already
There's already been plenty of articles released about
the up-tick in Linux server rollouts and OpenOffice
deployments to desktop environments. You're right,
with this economy, this is the way to go, until the
higher priced licensed products start to provide a
business value/advantage over the competition. Right
now, the advantage any business has is keeping its
doors open by cost-cutting.
Spats309th Jan 2009 -
The CES speech will go down as a watershed moment
SteveB once again took it to the next level. His vision of where Microsoft is headed is in lock step with the future of the civilized world. My only fear is that for at least the next 4 years, we will have a President who does not share SteveB's vision and may try and hinder Windows7 deployments at the Federal Govt level. This interview is a treasure chest of information. If I were Google and Apple I would start considering forming alliances with Microsoft today. SteveB and his juggernaut of talented developers will soon crush Google and Apple and leave Windows7/Live Search as the defacto way we work and play. This speech was more important than FDR's "the only thing we fear" or JFK's "ask not what your country can do for you" speeches.
Mike Cox10th Jan 2009
Talkback - Tell Us What You Think
The best of ZDNet, delivered
ZDNet Newsletters
Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox




