EC responds to Microsoft's browser move
Summary: The European Commission on Thursday responded with a mixed assessment of Microsoft's move to strip Internet Explorer out of European versions of Windows 7.
As first reported by CNET News, Microsoft has been telling PC makers of its plan to offer Windows 7 in Europe with the browser removed. PC makers and consumers would have to add in a browser. That would be simple - and potentially profitable - for PC makers, but could prove quite a hassle for those trying to upgrade an existing PC to Windows 7.
In a statement, regulators said that the move seems a step backward in the retail software arena, but said it could be more positive in the new PC market, which is how 95 percent of consumers get a new version of Windows.
"As for retail sales, which amount to less than 5 percent of total sales, the Commission had suggested to Microsoft that consumers be provided with a choice of Web browsers," the Commission said. "Instead Microsoft has apparently decided to supply retail consumers with a version of Windows without a Web browser at all. Rather than more choice, Microsoft seems to have chosen to provide less."
But, as for the new computer market, stripping out the browser might be a good thing, the Commission says.
"As for sales to computer manufacturers, Microsoft's proposal may potentially be more positive," the commission said. "It is noted that computer manufacturers would appear to be able to choose to install Internet Explorer--which Microsoft will supply free of charge--another browser or multiple browsers."
Opera, the Norwegian browser maker that pushed the EU to open its case, said that it is wholly dissatisfied with Microsoft's action.
"They are under pressure to do something and they come up with this thing, which is quite obviously not going to work," Opera CTO Hakon Wium Lie said in an interview "This is very similar to what the remedy was in the Media Player case. It was widely recognized that that was an insufficient remedy. It was too little too late."
Lie said Opera favors an option that the EU has been considering in which consumers would be offered a choice of browsers when they buy a new PC.
The Commission said it expects to act soon in its own case against Microsoft, and suggests Microsoft's action wasn't among those it was considering. The commission issued a preliminary finding in January that the inclusion of a browser in Windows violated European antitrust law. Microsoft has objected to that finding.
"The Commission will shortly decide in the pending browser-tying antitrust case whether or not Microsoft's conduct from 1996 to date has been abusive and, if so, what remedy would be necessary to create genuine consumer choice and address the anticompetitive effects of Microsoft's long-standing conduct," the Commission said. "In terms of potential remedies if the Commission were to find that Microsoft had committed an abuse, the Commission has suggested that consumers should be offered a choice of browser not that Windows should be supplied without a browser at all."
This article was originally posted on CNET News.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Limiting browser pre-installs
If the EC were to issue a mandate to PC makers that required them to limit the installation of any one browser to say 25% of all new machines, it would:
1. prevent browser vendors with deep pockets (Microsoft, Google, Apple, ...) from "purchasing" (or finagling) 100% of the new PC installs.
2. make it easier for future browser vendors to bring their browser products into the mainstream.
3. provide a reasonably balanced solution for 95% of the problem.
The good news for PC makers is that, even Microsoft will have to pay, if they want to have IE pre-installed on new PCs, so this new found revenue would more than compensate them for any additional work required.
People purchasing these new PCs could stick with the browser that was pre-installed by the PC maker (which many will) or install their preferred browser and uninstall the original.
Imagine the support nightmares
It needs to be available just because who wants to train their support staff in 5 different browsers in several different versions
Oh come on...
and you've....
This will do nothing but raise the cost of computers, and give small businesses more support headaches.
for real
Well...
Suffice to say, as long as you can get them going, they're never going to notice if they're using a mainframe or an iPhone.
If you code to standards
As usual
RE: EC responds to Microsoft's browser move
And in a Corporation, individuals don't buy PCs, nor do they choose which software or hardware is added to them. The support team does that. So the support team choses Opra, Firefox or whatever and they have just one browser to support.
Wrong. Try again
Most web based internal IT applications work best with IE, and most IT developers prefer to only develop for one browser. Since IE has the largest market share, the developers prefer to target IE first.
This is wrong and inane...
How do you know that since there has never been a real choice? They pick it because it's ubiquitous.
"Most web based internal IT applications work best with IE"
Only because they are made to target, if that. Internal IT developers target IE because it's chosen by the corporations because it's ubiquitous... and the whole thing is backwards. Whereas a standards based execution would work across platforms and be extensible and flexible.
If you prefer to target any browser... then you're a lazy developer. If your forced to then sorry bout your luck... but it needs to change sometime... because it's a huge problem that has completely frozen technological advancement in a lot of corporations and tethered them to a browser that's three versions old (IE6) because they would have to completely rewrite the applications to work on new, more advanced software. The corps would save money if the learned to embrace progressive enhancement.
As usual
So...
How can people
Go back a couple steps and read...
RE: EC responds to Microsoft's browser move
Absolute madness.
PC makers & users still have freedom
With this model, the browser companies start on a relatively even footing. After that, browser marketshare would adjust naturally, as users migrate between browsers to find the one that meets their specific needs (e.g. performance, usability, features, standards compliance, etc.).
Once again
You appear to want a law that forces an arbitrary number of PC makers to supply its customers with Opera, or Safari, or some other minority browser, when very few are likely to want those browsers or know what to do with them. All of this you justify, no doubt, by saying that you know what's best. And here was me thinking communism was history...
For retail purchases
"INTERNET EXPLORER 8 IS AVAILABLE ON THE COMPANION CD. ALTERNATIVE BROWSER'S ARE AVAILABLE FROM FOLLOWING MANUFACTURES:
FIREFOX: WWW.MOZILLA.COM
OPERA: WWW.OPERA.COM
SAFARI: WWW.APPLE.COM/SAFARI/DOWNLOAD/
ECT...
THERE MAY BE OTHER BROWSER OPTIONS AVAILABLE FROM ADDITIONAL SOURCES UNKNOWN AT THE TIME OF THIS MANUFACTURE."
There is your choice, your notification of atlernatives. Of course this will infuriate EU politicians, but it will meet their requirements.
Anything else is the tantamount to saying "ALL BMW AND MECERDES DEALERS WILL ALSO BE REQUIRED TO CARRY CADILLAC, ACURA, INFINITY, LEXUS, ect...)
Did you run into a wall?
Your analogy is crumbled... because a OS and an internet browser are not the same product... but they are coming bundled.
It's more like Gillette selling all razors bundled with Gillette shaving cream... and Gillette owning 95% of razor marketing share... and none of the other shaving cream manufacturers can get their products recognized, although they are superior... because everyone just uses the shaving cream that comes with their razor.