Microsoft COO: Standing firm on Vista
Summary
Topics
Prior to his current stint as head of operations at Redmond, 42-year-old Turner spent 19 years in retail chain Wal-Mart, where he held various senior positions including chief information officer and chief executive of Wal-Mart subsidiary Sam's Warehouse.
In August 2005, he filled a spot that had been left vacant at Microsoft since 2002 when former COO Rick Belluzo left as part of a company reorganization.
In an email interview with ZDNet Asia, Turner underscored the company's confidence in Windows Vista, which he said hit "a milestone" in March when 140 million copies of the operating system were sold.
He stated that Vista is faring better than its predecessor, Windows XP, in terms of security, clocking in at fewer malwares and vulnerabilities.
Q: You spent 19 years in a company that uses technology [and was a customer of Microsoft], before joining a company widely known for the technology it sells. It would be three years in August since you began your COO tenure at Microsoft. What's the biggest change and challenge you've had to overcome and get accustomed to, having moved from a CIO to a COO position? And how have you 'tweaked' your mindset for the change in landscape?
A: There are more similarities than differences in the two companies. I am fortunate to be one of few people who have had the opportunity to work for two of the most successful entrepreneurs of our time: [Wal-Mart founder] Sam Walton and [Microsoft chairman] Bill Gates.
Both men have instilled similar values into their companies. One that has had a strong impact on me is having a sense of 'divine discontent' or, as we call it at Microsoft, being self-critical without getting de-motivated. This is one of our six company values and something we work very hard to maintain. We are constantly looking for ways to improve what we do, while at the same time staying motivated by the progress we have made.
Another aspect that resonates with me is that both businesses are about 'people'. Everything in business begins and ends with people, and how we treat our people and our customers will dictate how successful we are as a company. We can never lose sight of the fact that people are at the center of our software and our business.
Your job description includes responsibilities for product and customer support services/branding, advertising and PR, as well as internal IT that supports Microsoft's 78,000-plus employees. How do you balance these two job aspects, one where you have to evangelize your company's products, and the other that may require you to manage employee expectations of those same products?
This is one of the greatest benefits of my job. We believe we have the opportunity and responsibility to be our own first and best customer, and to really put our products through their paces.
Having responsibility for IT and sales helps me relate to our customers and partners better and really understand what it takes to deploy and maintain our products.
A recent study by Quocirca of C-level execs indicates 90 percent of companies outsource over 40 percent of their software codes. And while 78 percent of them recognize the importance of software development, 60 percent that do outsource coding work for their critical apps do not demand security to be built into the software. What are your thoughts on this, and how do you think a company like Microsoft can play a role?
Architecting applications to be safe and secure is one of our top priorities. Windows Vista is an example of this. We built Vista with security in mind right from the start.
We are one year out from launch and there have been less than half the vulnerabilities of XP SP2, and 60 percent less malware than XP SP2. Security is one of the top reasons customers are moving to Windows Vista.
Beyond Windows Vista, we are trying to lead by example in our other applications, as well as helping our community of software developers build applications with security in mind.
Applications should be secure by design. We will always have to address the evolution of software and the fact security threats are constant, but by building applications on a strong foundation, we can make things better in the long run.
During a conference in July 2006, you said: "Enterprise search is our business, it's our house and Google is not going to take that business." It's almost two years since then--is this still the core market you see Microsoft and Google compete in? And where do you think Google stands now in this market?
The IT industry has historically been defined by a series of periodic, transformative shifts in the way people think about computing, and we're in the midst of another: a services transformation.
With any of these transformative shifts, the prediction is that change will happen swiftly and completely. But the reality is quite the opposite. Customers want choice, and that is the foundation of our software-plus-services strategy. We are giving customers the choice of what they want to do with their data and infrastructure. If they want to run it on-site, we will support that. If customers want a partner to host a solution, we will support that as well. Finally, if a customer wants Microsoft to host a solution, as many have asked us to do, we can do that. Again, it is about giving customers a choice, which is a very different strategy than our competitors.
Vista clearly didn't exactly have a smooth ride leading up to its launch, with various delays, security fixes and longer-than-expected testing. Given a chance to, is there a one thing you would have done differently in the design, development and marketing of Vista? And where does SP1 play in the scheme of things?
We are very pleased with Windows Vista to date. We have currently sold over 140 million copies through to March. It was a milestone for us and the technology community.
Different customers adopt at different paces, and we are seeing more and more enterprise companies adopting at a faster rate of deployment compared to both Windows XP and Windows 2000. The list of enterprises moving forward on deployment is continually growing, and some of our largest customers are in the process of deploying, like Shell, Continental, Banco Brandesco, Infosys and Cerner.
SP1 also brings a number of changes that continue to improve the Windows Vista experience and with its availability, we believe more customers will move into the adoption phase.
Talkback Most Recent of 10 Talkback(s)
-
I like the 64-bit version for a better GUI and good app compatibility
But they really need to go back to the drawing board. Vista (32- or 64-bit) should in no way require 4x more RAM and 10x more disk space just for its own processes. (XP uses 1.5GB disk space and 300MB of RAM; Vista uses 15GB disk space and 1.2GB RAM)
Even the transition from Windows 2000 to XP wasn't as steep (800MB disk space, 128MB RAM)
New low end laptops ($500, with 1GB RAM) barely run with Vista; people are encouraged to get a RAM upgrade for a brand new machine. I think that is unprecedented...
Vista DOES have a lot of nifty and useful enhancements, but that bloated footprint is a just due criticism.
HypnoToad30th May 2008 -
Optimization...
...is a lost art. If it's anything like where I work, programmers are pretty much told "machines are fast, RAM is cheap, HDs are cheap, so don't worry". The lost art of optimization (and by that I don't mean writing weird, ugly unmanageable code - I just mean don't waste resources.)
I'm not seeing the memory usage you're seeing here though. I have Vista Ultimate running several servers (SQL Server 2005 Express, MySQL, Apache, Perforce and a couple of third party services) and I'm just closing in on 1Gb of RAM used - around 900Mb if I'm not mistaken.)
Anyway, I much prefer Vista over XP (no way I'd go back here at home) but yes, you do need more horsepower. My employer is converting to Vista this coming September (around 6000 machines) - a bit of a surprise since we only converted to XP about two years ago. From what I'm told, all tests so far have been satisfactory. We'll see, as I have to test a couple of in-house applications myself (and make changes as needed.)
Mike (not Cox)30th May 2008 -
True. If sloppiness is good enough, it saves money and time...
(not really, but all that matters is the price on the sticker. So much for even ethics.)
When the day is said and done, I too prefer Vista and a lot of the incompatibility complaints are overrated; it's not that bad. But given their track record, especially post-2001, how bloaty will Windows 7 be, by its launch in 2009, 2010, 2012, 2015... Horsepower is a wonderful thing, but having worked with computers since the days of 8-bit Atari, their next OS will require 4GB of RAM and will be 64-bit only, as there would be nothing left for the 32-bit version (architecture limitations). I can think of better reasons to migrate than to willfully bloat the current architecture to extinction...
HypnoToad31st May 2008 -
Vista isn't a server operating system?
So why are you using it as such? you seem to crap on an awful lot about the 'crappiness of Windows' and yet, you go and use a tool for something it was never designed for - whose fault is that then? certainly not Microsoft's!
Also it is intereting that you ignore the changes; if I had a dine for everytime I saw memory being gobbled up on *NIX - I'd be able to buy Microsoft; don't assume that because you've read the system resource meter, that it is a fair reflect as to where the resources are going.
Kaiwai31st May 2008 -
Crapiness?
I was just commenting on the fact that it requires a lot of resources out of the box (compared to XP), and on general resource-wasting by software (any) because of cheap hardware. I love Vista myself. I've been using it for a little over a year with next to no problems (I'm just apparently stuck with an older Nvidia driver, since all new versions seem to crash my desktop machine - laptop is fine with newer versions.) But that's a Nvidia issue, can't blame the OS (I had the same problem with XP - had to stick with an older driver.) I had a lot more stability problems with XP (with less software installed) than I've had with Vista - it's rock solid so far. As a bonus, it doesn't look like crap (I always hate the XP interface.)
I'm not running Vista as a server, I just happen to have database, web and source control server software installed on it for development purpose. If I want to develop off an Oracle or SQL Server database, I need the software on my machine (they're both the Express editions, of course, no need for more at home.) It's not "serving" any other machine (well, the source control server can be accessed from my laptop.) If I ever want to run a full blown server, I'll get Windows Server 2008 (which is based on Vista, if I'm not mistaken.)
In fact you completely misread my comment. I was saying that despite having all that stuff running on my machine, my RAM usage was lower than the other poster's (the guy I replied to above.)
When I have all server services enabled and a few other programs running all at once, I only get close to 1.3Gb RAM used, and the system is just as responsive as when I stop all server services.
Mike (not Cox)1st Jun 2008 -
Vista is the Greatest Operating System I ever seen
I have started my IT career 20 years ago. I have been working on a variety of OSes on a professional level. I have never seen any other OS working so well and secure. All the comments from the media about Vista are absolutely stupid. Obviously a lot of people who wrote the articles have never even tried it. These days what ever Microsoft does is no good. What ever Google does is good. How much Google knows about software? At the end of day, you should know who is making money. Consumers are not stupid. Google day won't last since luck only comes once and twice, technology lasts.
jk_1030th May 2008 -
The problem is not with the people who haven't tried Vista...
...but the ones who had bad experiences with it (myself included). You may find it difficult to believe, but there are quite a few of them, regardless of whose fault it is.
John L. Ries30th May 2008 -
Sam Walton was...
one of the most scrupulously honest people in the
world. His life was an exemplary life.
Turner answers questions like the liar he is, giving no
straight answer to anything but repeating the party
line.
Turner might have made a good party apparachik
under Stalin for a while.
When he is liquidated by Ballmer, his words will have
delicious irony.
Among Ballmer, Turner and Bach, there has probably
never been a true utterance.
Jeremy W30th May 2008 -
Should Microsoft Stick to The Basics?
A little excerpt from Friday, May 30th, 2008
by the oracle:
"Gates has big ideas about lots of things, but his mind tends to wander these days. He can?t seem to decide what is good for the world, raping it with bad software and plentiful lawsuits or being a benefactor to the less fortunate. This lack of focus may be fine for one person, but is totally destructive for a corporate entity."
"Microsoft worked on Vista for the greater part of six years, delivered about 30% of what was initially advertised, and did not do that well. The fact that some of the latest tests of Vista SP1, delivered over a year after the GOLD release, are just beginning to show close behavior to XP (not performance parity, by any means) shows that Microsoft lost focus on the project."
"Now imagine for a moment, all those people who were working on pet projects of Gates and Co., focused instead on getting the promises of Vista delivered. Vista could be fast, do what Gates promised (remember WinFS?) and cost less. Why? Because a concerted effort would have meant that less advertising was needed at the outset, and much less spin control to quell the discontent among those afflicted with Vista."
"One of our early presidents was known to say ?Walk softly, and carry a big stick?. A popular musician a few years ago released an album called ?Let the Music Do the Talking?. Why can?t Microsoft marry the concepts? It should walk softly, let the quality of its software do the talking, and also let the quality act as a big stick, to beat down the idea of anyone using other software."
"As all should know, quality needs no excuses, little advertising, and speaks highly of its progenitor."
I totally agree.
Ole Man31st May 2008 -
Ole Man31st May 2008
Talkback - Tell Us What You Think
The best of ZDNet, delivered
ZDNet Newsletters
Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox




