madison

Patenting peanut butter and jelly?

Declan McCullagh | September 13, 2005 2:39 PM PDT

Summary

With the millions of patents being approved, it's easy to find some very questionable "inventions" like the crustless sandwich or a tree-branch dog chew.
Whatever one's area of interest may be, it's easy to find seeminglybizarre examples of patents that have been granted.

There's the "sealed crustless sandwich" (U.S. Patent No. 6,004,596 ), patented in1999 by two independent inventors and subsequently purchased by J.M.Smucker. The invention is described in part as a sandwich with twofillings, such as peanut butter and jelly, that can be prepacked forstorage in "lunch box type of situations."

Other odd patents include a tree-branch-shaped chew toy for a dog (No.6,360,693), a bird feeder for "religious meditation" (No.6,837,185) and "method of exercising a cat" using a laser beam that the feline chases (No. 5,443,036).

In a book published last year titled "Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System is Endangering Innovation and Progress, and What to Do About It," co-authors Adam Jaffe and Josh Lerner trace thepatent system's problems back to 1982.

That's when Congress made two crucial alterations to patent law.Politicians created a special federal court for patent appeals anddecided that the size of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's budgetwould depend on the number of patent applications it receives.

At the time, those changes seemed merely procedural. But Jaffe andLerner argue that the changes created a cadre of judges so focused onpatents that they have lost sight of the larger picture, insteadstrengthening the rights of patent holders and making it easier to seekcourt injunctions.

Altering the Patent and Trademark Office's funding mechanism,according to the book, altered the agency's incentives and made it morelikely to approve patents. The more applications it received, of course,the more money it would make.

"Now that it is possible to get a patent on unoriginal ideas, manymore dubious applications are being filed," according to Jaffe andLerner. "And with success now more likely for patent holders who suetheir competitors, more such suits are filed or threatened.Increasingly, the firm with the best lawyers or the greatest capacity towithstand the risk of litigation wins the innovation wars--rather thanthe company with the brightest scientists or most original, valuableideas."

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity