ie8 fix
Click Here

SAN and NAS defined

Todd Volz | March 6, 2002 12:00 AM PST

Summary

Which should you implement, SAN or NAS? Tech Update explains the key differences between these storage systems.
Aside from the similarity of the acronyms, SAN and NAS technologies are quite different, and serve different purposes.

A SAN (see Figure 1) is a high-speed subnetwork of devices that lets you offload traffic from your main network. Usually composed of RAID arrays connected via Fibre Channel, a SAN communicates with servers and clients through SCSI commands instead of TCP/IP, handling data at the block level. A NAS (see Figure 2) is typically composed of networked file servers that make use of Ethernet and TCP/IP, handling data at the file level. You attach NAS devices to an existing TCP/IP network (usually Ethernet) to add additional storage.

A simple way to remember the difference between SAN and NAS is to think about how each technology is implemented. NAS is commonly found in server farms--application servers, e-mail servers, and so on--where increasing storage volume is as easy as attaching another system to the network. A SAN is usually deployed for e-commerce applications, data backup and other cases in which large amounts of data must be stored and transmitted over a network; a SAN lets you offload such high-volume traffic, sparing your Ethernet network from congestion.

Does your organization use SAN, NAS or both, and how? Let us know in our Talkback forum below.

The discussion hasn’t started yet. Why don’t you begin it?

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity