madison

StarOffice: Bigger, not necessarily better

Evan Leibovitch | October 18, 2000 12:00 AM PDT

Summary

StarOffice's open sourcing isn't the breakthrough some believe.
Judging just by the number of lines of code, Sun's releasing of (most of) StarOffice under open sourcelicensing is certainly the most massive project of its kind, ever.

The code -- releasedthis past Friday (the 13th), just as Sun predicted back in July -- isnow out in the open. You can download and play with it, either underthe GNU Public License or another licensecrafted to allow Sun and others to make proprietary offshoots.

The publicly available source code is now called OpenOffice. Think of it this way:OpenOffice is to StarOffice what Mozilla is to Communicator. Indeed, thereare many parallels between OpenOffice and the Mozilla browser project, inthe ways that the two companies (Sun and Netscape, respectively) grapple withthe challenges of bringing proprietary code through the open source world.

Thankfully, among the parallels there's one important difference: thecode made available at the beginning of the OpenOffice project actuallyproduces a binary that runs. By comparison, Mozilla.org delivered a blobof uncompilable code that required almost a total re-write and still isn'tout of beta 18 months later.

Mind you, just because you can get thesource code to OpenOffice, doesn't necessarily mean you're going towant it. The sheer volume of the code requires more than three gigabytesof hard disk space in which to build, and compiles have been reported totake more than 20 hours to complete. I'm no programmer, and I have betterthings to do with 20 hours. So I just downloaded the binaries, which haveworked OK for me so far, though I haven't exactly done anystress-testing.

So what we have in OpenOffice at this time is some usable software(version 6.05) that the website says is alpha-quality code, which meansthat the maintainers of OpenOffice havesome work ahead of them. It's just as well that the maintainers arecurrently allSun staff, since it's going to take the rest of the world quite sometime to get its head around all those million lines of OpenOffice sourcecode. Apparently most of the comments in the code are in German,reflecting StarOffice's roots from before it was purchasedby Sun last November. This further slows the code examination processfor most people who live outside Germany and Austria.

Now, I admit, I do use StarOffice. Well, at least I try. The documentationthat came with the 5.2 download was pretty ratty. At the StarOfficewebsite, the closest thing I could find to a tutorial was a PDF-format "reviewer'sguide" -- and it's not that good either. I'll be having a look soon atwhat I hope to be reasonable third party books. But competentdocumentation is something I certainly miss as I leave WordPerfect.

There are also some StarOffice features that I'm not particularly fond ofand that I expect to find repeated in OpenOffice. But I'll keep usingStarOffice, and will likely move to OpenOffice once it's stable, since they'rethe only tools natively available on Linux that nicely read a whole bunchof proprietary Microsoft file formats. As most of you probably know, ifyou can't read documents produced by Microsoft software, there's a lot ofthe world whose communications you can't read. And StarOffice, for all itswarts, is capable of reading and writing these files. Unfortunately -- andthis is extremely irritating to someone trying to switch -- StarOffice(and OpenOffice) won't read WordPerfect files.

Yet I don't expect I'll be using StarOffice, or even post-alpha versionsof OpenOffice, for a very long time. I see, not far away on the Linux appshorizon, other open source word processors that will have the features Ineed without the bloat -- or the heavy-handed politics.

Yeah, politics. Nasty politics, and plenty of it. But you'll need to waitfor next week to hear more about about that...

What do you think of OpenOffice? Let me know in the TalkBack below.

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity