The new war for talent

The new war for talent

Summary: Believe it or not, we're heading for a severe skilled worker shortage, says Taleo CEO Michael Gregoire. Companies should begin planning now for recruiting and retention or pay the price later.

SHARE:
TOPICS: CXO, IT Employment
3
Commentary--It may sound like the preview for an end-of-the-world B movie, but the fears of an impending global war for talent are based on very real factors. The converging forces of aging workers and retiring baby boomers, the tech savvy Millennial Generation’s foray into employment, females exiting the workforce, and shortages of skilled workers will soon produce a labor shortage the likes of which the industrialized world has never experienced.

Research bares this out. Development Dimensions International reports that one-fifth of this country's large, established companies will be losing 40 percent or more of their top-level talent in the next five years. The Bureau of Labor Statistics confirms that “by 2008 the number of young adult workers, from 25 to 40 year olds, will decline by 1.7 million” overturning a historic growth rate from 54 percent to 3 percent in the next 20 years. By 2010, the U.S. will face a 10 million workforce shortage and an unemployment rate of just 2 percent.

The Conference Board CEO Challenge of 2007 points out that “Cracking the U.S. Top 10 this year is finding qualified managerial talent and top management succession.” Simply put, the looming war for talent is very real and, left unaddressed, stands to dramatically alter the economic performance of companies and countries. That’s why informed CEOs around the globe are challenging their HR leadership to develop winning strategies for recruiting and retaining the top talent that will continue to drive growth and performance. These combined strategies, technologies, and processes are now encompassed in talent management.

A brief history of talent
Before 1997, the word talent was primarily used to describe people in the entertainment industry. Managing talent was a profession for agents, casting directors, and publicists. Then The War for Talent was coined that year by three McKinsey consultants who compiled their research into a bestseller published four years later. Management tended to ignore the implications because the authors mainly explored macroeconomic workforce issues that were perceived to be too academic for the frenzied landscape of the dotcom gold rush. Had the book been published today, it would be required reading for all managers.

Shifting workforce dynamics
Welcome to the new millennium. Your company’s brainpower is now more valuable than your bricks. Outsourcing to emerging talent markets has delivered mixed results. And the top college graduates you recruit are entering your workforce with new attitudes. We no longer enjoy a climate where employers can handily recruit top talent. Workforce dynamics have fundamentally shifted in three major ways now giving preferential treatment to the employee and challenging employers to adapt.

Intellect vs. hard assets
As the major industrialized nations moved from a producing economy to a service economy, so has the value of our companies. While it is still easier to understand the value of a truck or an airplane compared to an employee, the world is moving in this direction of placing a premium value on talent. In fact, The Economist reported that intangible assets have shot up from 20 percent of the value of companies in the S&P 500 in 1980 to around 70 percent today. A fundamental shift has occurred where the executive team’s primary responsibility has changed from access and management of capital to access and management of talent.

Not convinced? Then think about the rise in both power and valuation of companies that have very little hard assets. Think about the economic power of companies like Google, Microsoft, Apple, Goldman Saks, Bank of America, Citigroup, and JPMorganChase. All of these companies have little to no hard assets other than office equipment and buildings. Their true value is measured by the strength of their intellectual property and people.

Demographics
The Employment Policy Foundation reports that by 2030 the U.S. will experience a labor deficit of 35 million workers. Many Western economies believe that the large populations of India and China will solve all their talent problems. While outsourcing may help to mitigate some of the talent management shortfalls it is likely to be only a partial solution. Talent shortfalls will not be solved by leaning on other countries but by relying on our own innovation and execution to acquire and retain top talent to drive company performance.

Employee Control
One of John F. Kennedy’s most famous quotes is: "Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country." The mantra of today’s workforce has changed the beneficiary 180 degrees to: “Ask not what I can do for your company, but what can your company do for me.”

Today’s workforce is in control. Employees want to understand how they are connected to the company. They want to know how they can progress. They want to work at a place that fits their lifestyle choices. As employers, we have been placed in the unenviable position of needing to market our companies to our employees each and every day. If we neglect to engage our own employees, those who are frustrated can surf hundreds of job boards to see what other opportunities await.

Talent buyer to company marketer
Company recruiters used to approach the talent marketplace as talent buyers. But HR has evolved from personnel management to understanding that all managers, starting with the CEO, are accountable for strengthening their talent pool. Now company recruiters and CEO’s alike recognize that they must rely on a myriad of marketing techniques to target top talent. There are three major actions every company can take to address the mounting labor shortages: foster viral user adoption, embrace innovation, and establish a talent management system of record.

Foster viral user adoption
Why have Google, Yahoo, Amazon, and Facebook have experienced rapid viral adoption? Because their user interfaces are easy to use, easy to navigate, and replicate familiar consumer web experiences. The best consumer website designs have it right. Business applications for recruiting and performance management systems should be no different. In order for talent management philosophies to become ubiquitous, they need to be adopted not only by candidates who are adept at searching and applying for jobs online but by managers and employees as well. A user-friendly talent management system enables managers to oversee employee goals and performance, career development, and succession planning as part of everyday business with seamless integration to standard business applications including email. Usability makes this kind of viral adoption inevitable.

Embrace innovation
A cumbersome and complex ERP system will not suit the masses of young talent joining today’s workforce. Embracing innovation means an application must be always available 24X&, anytime, anywhere. Here, the on demand model for innovation adoption can be a secret weapon. On demand provides software vendors with the ability to quickly, easily, and cost effectively deliver a business process over the Internet without the resource-intensive software deployment cycles. Customers benefit as well by getting these features rapidly and without the hassles of protracted software installation cycles and maintenance. On demand reduces both the upfront costs and time to value from software and provides a compelling TCO and economic savings over in-house deployment.

Create a talent management system of record
It is very hard to mine knowledge from information that is not centrally located. Talent data affects every facet of the business, but it tends to be stored across various repositories. These silos are constructed in multiple spreadsheets and word processing documents, locked in antiquated ERP systems, or stored in various point solutions. This strategy is plagued with unnecessary expense and inaccuracy. A talent management system of record on an open technology platform is more than just an option. It’s now a requirement for HR and business success. Companies that embrace the technology get a truly unified view of recruiting, hiring, onboarding, succession planning, performance reviews, career planning, goals, and analytics.

The talent platform: From option to necessity
Economics and demographics have combined to fuel our new war for talent. Insightful business leaders have acknowledged the challenge and offered HR a seat at the executive table. Managers at all levels are recognizing the importance of talent acquisition and retention. Employees are taking control with self-service attitudes. And HR leaders at leading companies are developing and executing innovative strategies for recruiting and retaining the top talent they need to succeed. But they all need a common basis for intuitively using and measuring these new processes. When you recognize that people are the difference and talent is the strategy, you realize that an on demand, always available, easy-to-use, and easy-to-deploy talent management system of record is the key for aligning talent with business objectives while significantly reducing process costs, improving quality of hire, reducing risk, and achieving higher levels of performance. The war for talent is real. But so are the solutions.

biography
Michael Gregoire is president and chief executive officer of the Taleo Corporation.

Topics: CXO, IT Employment

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

3 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • I think you're right but, execs don't look beyond 24 months

    I see you're data but if the talent shortage of 1999-2000 is any indication, executives do not look beyond 24 months. Arguably, do they look beyond 12 months. They appease wall street - which is short term focused.

    It is a sad state of affairs. In 1999-2000 it was impossible to hire good talent. We will likely see the same in coming years - which is sort of good news/bad news depending on where one lies in the labor supply/demand equation.
    Prognosticator
  • RE: The new war for talent

    This article spells out very strongly why those who adopt new, innovative approaches to recruiting will prosper over the next decade.

    Jeremy Samuel, GM, 2Vouch.
    blog: blog.2vouch.com
    web: www.2vouch.com
    jeremysamuel
  • The phony talent shortage/talent war scam

    You should warn readers to pull on their waders.

    There has been no shortage of science and tech
    talent. There is no shortage of science and tech
    talent, and you've failed to provide any evidence of
    impending shortage. Nor have you provided any
    evidence that executives are going to any great effort
    to recruit. If they were, we'd be seeing hundreds of
    help-wanted job ads for full-time permanent science
    and tech people in every major paper in the country,
    and the web job boards would similarly be over-
    flowing. Instead, the vast majority of on-line ads are
    mere body shopping -- temporary gigs, programming
    "services", etc.

    You did not look, for instance, at increasing life
    expectancies, which now reach over 80 years for
    adults.

    The only war is a competition amongst spoiled
    executives in business and academe to see who can
    whine "shortage" the loudest, and laugh to the bank
    with the difference between competitive wages and
    what they can get by flooding the job markets with
    artificially vast excesses.
    Professor8