madison

The Snow Leopard appreciation society

Seb Janacek silicon.com | September 17, 2009 7:44 AM PDT

Summary

Apple's latest OS doesn't aim to wow with a host of new features: it's the little things that count. It's kind of like repairing a used-car. You never realized how much better it could be.
A lot has been written about Snow Leopard since its release two weeks ago: but maybe the best way of describing Apple's latest operating system update is by comparing it to a second-hand Volkswagen I owned a couple of years after finishing university.

Apple aficionados will no doubt be appalled by the choice of car comparison. Usually, when people trot out car metaphors for Apple the company is represented by a BMW or a Merc.

Must Read: Snow Leopard Special Report

However, this was the early 1990s and arts graduates weren't loaded then (or now). Besides, it's my metaphor and I'm going to stick with it.

The Volkswagen in particular was a perfectly good car. Solidly made, comfy and easy to drive. It had around 65,000 miles on the clock. OK, it had some little idiosyncrasies - little rattles and tiny flaws. Nothing that stopped me getting from A to B. Slightly annoying, nonetheless.

It was serviced annually at a local garage and one year I happened to mention to the mechanic the little problems.

A few days later I realized the persistent rattle in the driver's door had gone. Bliss. A week went by before the heavens opened and suddenly it struck me that the wiper, which previously missed a patch of windscreen just to the right of the driver's eye line, had been sorted. Heaven.

Likewise, you can't fully appreciate Snow Leopard until you've spent a couple of weeks in the big cat's company and remembered what it was like before the upgrade.

Snow Leopard
Snow Leopard

There was a lot of talk from Apple about the disk space it clears up but this was just a fleeting joy. Yes, it was great regaining 12GB of HD space but as an external drive junkie, this was a mere drop in the terabyte ocean.

The delight that endures is the discovery, in many cases by surprise, that dozens of the little annoyances you'd forgotten because you've learned to endure them for so long have been swept away and have been replaced by elegant and swanky little finesses.

What was exciting about Panther, Tiger and Leopard were the range of new features. Plus the fact that your applications worked.

There were the essential new features, like Time Machine and Spotlight. The genuinely useful like Spaces, Dashboard (which still has its critics) and Expose.

Then, there were the clever but generally cosmetic stuff like Fast User Switching. Woo... oh. Finally, there were features that looked pretty but were frustrating to use, like Stacks.

Those shiny features gave Apple's easily excitable marketing department something to crow about. With Snow Leopard, you can imagine the tumbleweeds rolling through the minimalist Cupertino offices when the product spec landed.

Snow Leopard is not a brand new car, just the one you've already got with a lot of the flaws, problems and squeaks ironed out and some minor but noticeable tweaks to performance.

Some examples:

  • A QuickTime player that lets you record video and audio and edit them simply, for free
  • Quicker loading and more responsive native applications
  • Allowing an application to be shared across multiple desktop Spaces
  • Moving the keyboard and mouse preferences into two

In other words things that make a real difference to the way you work. Or at least the way I work, you may find other tweaks that delight the senses.

There have been reports of incompatibility with software (in my case with six-year-old Windows virtualisation software), some applications need the Rosetta software emulator and it is slightly puzzling that a week after the release of Snow Leopard the first update (10.6.1) was released.

In many way, it's very anti-Apple but I'd be very happy to dispense with future eye candy if the next iteration of the Mac operating system is as packed with hidden treasures. It's a software release which proves definitively the old aphorism that 'less is more'.

Beep! Beep!

This article was originally posted on silicon.com.

Talkback Most Recent of 16 Talkback(s)

  • ...but there are also the things that it broke...
    Like being able to log in after joining the computer to an Active Directory domain. If it's a clean install, no domain user can log on because Snow Leopard will not create the mobile account. This was not an issue under Leopard. You have to go into terminal to manually create the mobile account for each user. Not an ideal solution in an enterprise.

    Or little things, like randomly changing desktop backgrounds not changing randomly. At least not with 3 monitors hooked up to two 7300 GT cards in a first-gen Mac Pro.

    Or iTunes reporting a different file size than Finder, because of the base 2 vs. base 10 file size calculation. Or RAM still being reported in base 2.

    Don't get me wrong, overall, Snow Leopard is fine. But for me, a lot of the glitches are things that used to work fine but are now broken.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    mrbofus
    17th Sep 2009
  • Yes it is basically nice.....
    Not awe inspiring or anything like that but nice and you know
    nice is well nice:P

    As software is tweaked to take advantage of some of the
    under the hood improvements it will be nicer still. So no bad
    after taste just a good solid upgrade that will keep on giving
    over time.

    Pagan jim
    ZDNet Gravatar
    James Quinn
    17th Sep 2009
  • RE: The Snow Leopard appreciation society
    It broke Windowshades. An unforgivable sin given the developers 'tude, who don't seem to care about upgrading it.
    Why Apple did away with this confounds me, Dock is good, but not nearly as efficient as windowshades, at least in the way I work.

    Working Stiff
    NH
    ZDNet Gravatar
    WorkingStiff
    17th Sep 2009
  • Windowshades
    Amen to that! The developers must be crazy, the way that they are
    goofing off WRT updating this jewel, a bargain at twice the price.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    hwgray
    17th Sep 2009
  • Can you say hack?
    Windowshade is a haxie that has many compatibility problems with Tiger and Leopard applications. It originally came into being as a third party init in System 6. Then Apple incorporated it into System 7. But with OS X, Windowshade was left as a third party haxie.

    I am sure the developer will come up with a Snow Leopard compatible version of Windowshade in the next six months. Just be prepared to possibly experience some problems with some of your apps.

    In the meantime, Snow Leopard offers some improvements to Expose you may be interested in at this link:

    http://gizmodo.com/5285033/snow-leopards-new-expose-and-dock-explained
    ZDNet Gravatar
    aj.redmond@...
    17th Sep 2009
  • If you think you need Window Shade, I don't think you're utilizing...
    If you think you need Window Shade, I don't think you're utilizing Expos? to its fullest potential.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    olePigeon
    24th Sep 2009
  • RE: The Snow Leopard appreciation society
    Would be nice if the first time I booted into XP with
    bootcamp I wouldn't have had to spend an hour and a
    half thankfully repair my Mac partition so it would be
    recognized as Mac HD instead of EFI Boot that didn't go
    anywhere except back to Windows.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    creep144
    17th Sep 2009
  • I must agree
    For once, Apple hasn't oversold their new OS version. It also gives
    the lie to those who think Apple will soon be giving up on
    building computers. The new technologies in Snow Leopard are
    extremely forward looking and, even so, they don't interfere with
    operations on computers and with software that don't support
    them (except for Power PCs, which are history). This alone is an
    amazing accomplishment.

    As for WindowShade, it took some time for it to be updated for
    Tiger compatibility and even longer for Leopard. The same goes
    for other Unsanity haxies. This is not Apple's fault. So those of us
    who use them can expect to wait again. In the meantime, if I start
    using Expose up to it's potential, I may never need WindowShade
    again. The same goes for the Dock in relation to FruitMenu. How
    many Mac users still pine for OS 9? The Chooser anyone? I think
    I'll use the interregnum to learn to use OS X properly.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    thewhitedog
    20th Sep 2009
  • RE: The Snow Leopard appreciation society
    Sure would like to know more about booting into 64-bit mode; the 6+4 key combo at boot time doesn't seem to work for me. I have a Macbook 13", mfgd 9/2008, 2.4 MHz Intel proc, upgraded from 2GB RAM to 4GB ram; other than that, it's stock. Should I be able to run 64-bit, or do I need to install additional drivers/widgets/black magic?
    ZDNet Gravatar
    nosnetrom
    20th Sep 2009
  • MacBook
    Even though you and I share the 64 bit EFI in our MacBooks, Apple
    purposely disabled our ability to boot into 64 bit mode. Not sure why
    that is, but it's a fact. The upside is that booting into 64 bit mode really
    only benefits you if you've like 32GB of RAM installed, which isn't likely to
    happen anytime soon for our notebooks. Any 64 bit savvy application will
    run as a 64 bit application on our MacBooks though, without having the
    kernel running 64 bit. The point is, we really don't need to be running a
    64 bit kernel and we have all the advantages of running 64 bit
    applications. Hope that's helpful!
    ZDNet Gravatar
    dheady@...
    25th Sep 2009
  • Apple defaults to 32-bit...
    Apple defaults to 32-bit to ensure driver compatibility on consumer
    machines. One of the criticisms of EFI is that Intel had the chance to
    create a firmware that would allow software to address hardware in
    both 32-bit and 64-bit, but they didn't. So unfortunately Apple will
    have temporarily have to deal with drivers the way Microsoft does,
    provide two different operating systems.

    However, 64-bit applications will run fine under 32-bit OS X. At this
    juncture, there really is no point in running 64-bit. I assume Apple is
    in a transitionary phase. At some point XCode will be 64-bit only,
    and all drivers and software will be written as 64-bit only. When that
    happens, anyone running Snow Leopard or later will be able to
    seamlessly boot right into full 64-bit without any major hiccups.

    This will allow Apple to avoid maintaining two distinct OS products
    like Microsoft does with Windows.

    I wouldn't be surprised if 10.7 boots into 64-bit by default, with the
    majority of all drivers ported to 64-bit.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    olePigeon
    25th Sep 2009
  • What about Photoshop?
    Sure, this isn't Apple's fault, but Adobe is now demanding that we all upgrade to CS3 to use Photoshop on Snow Leopard. While I'm not a pro user, it will force me to stick with my ancient Powerbook, currently still running Tiger but to take on Leopard, to use Photoshop.

    For shame, Adobe.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Radiothomas
    21st Sep 2009
  • RE: The Snow Leopard appreciation society
    Just remember folks you could be a VISTA user. That puts it
    all into perspective doesn't it?
    ZDNet Gravatar
    jimzim
    22nd Sep 2009
  • Clarification about the freed space...
    Clarification about the freed space: It only applied if you
    didn't install Rosetta and X11. If you still have some
    PowerPC apps or X Windows based UNIX apps, you're not
    going to get that 12GBs.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    olePigeon
    24th Sep 2009
  • Further clarification
    You are correct about adding or not adding Rosetta. However, it will still
    'appear' that you've got more free space on your HD because of Apple's
    shift from using base 2 to using base 10 to calculate drive space. Since
    most computer companies and drive manufactures have been fudging
    this for years I don't see an issue with the change. But some of that free
    space with or without Rosetta is a slight of hand.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    dheady@...
    25th Sep 2009

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity