Together in harmony: Mac and PC
Summary
Topics
But I have since found a way forward with the machine. Rather than trying to jam it into my well-established workflow and have it replace my Windows laptop, I'm now trying to use it alongside my PC. It's also the only computer I travel with. And with a few tricks, I've found it to be a positive and productive experience.
Side by side on my computer keyboard (oh Lord...)
At work, I like using the MacBook for instant messaging, Twitter, Skype, for researching and browsing, and for anything involving video. My old ThinkPad is slow, and offloading these apps from it during the day is a small help. I still use my PC for e-mail, since there's as yet no reasonable replacement for Outlook if you work at a company that runs Exchange servers, and for writing and taking notes, since my fingers know their way around a PC keyboard.
Although I'm using two computers, I use only one primary keyboard. Thanks to the old open-source app Synergy (and the Mac version called SyngergyKM), I can control the Mac from the keyboard that's connected to my ThinkPad. I have my MacBook on a stand to the right of my Thinkpad's external monitor (recommended: the Rain Design mStand), and when I drag the mouse off the right edge of the Windows screen, it appears on the MacBook. The keyboard then controls the Mac as well. Even better, copy and paste works between the machines (although, awkwardly, the keystrokes for copy and paste are different on a PC and Mac--I'm still learning to adapt to that).
Setting up Synergy was not intuitive. But using it is. I now move between the platforms sometimes without really being aware of it.
Previous experiments
Before settling on Synergy, I used a KVM (IOGear MiniView Micro USB) to switch my external monitor between my Mac and PC, but the context switching slowed me down, and the lack of cut-and-paste between the machines made using them together difficult.
I also experimented with going all-Mac, hardware-wise anyway, running Outlook in a Windows XP virtual machine (VMWare Fusion) on the Mac, and devoting an external monitor to it while I ran OS X apps on my MacBook's built-in display. That solution, I found, was about 95 percent of the way there in terms of speed and the way the Mac handles the external keyboard I have. But that last 5 percent--keys that work differently on the Mac and the PC--was killing me. I may give in and try some keyboard remapping in the future, or I may buckle down and force myself to adapt. But for now, the Synergy solution works well for me.
Hitting the road
When I'm on the road, my old laptop stays on my desk at work, and the Mac comes with me. Since I don't want to have to think about where my data files are, I synchronize my working directory on my PC to a directory on my MacBook. That way, when I save a file on one machine, it just shows up on the other. There are a few solutions available to do this, but my pick is Microsoft's free app Live Sync. It's a peer-to-peer sync service--there's no "cloud" storage involved--so both my computers need to be on at the same time to get the files synced up. But since I no longer turn off my Windows laptop, this is fine. And unlike most of the sync solutions out there, Live Sync is free and puts no effective limit on the amount of data you can synchronize.
I have been using Microsoft Office for the Mac for productivity on the road. Honestly, I hate it. In an absolute sense it's not a bad suite, (except for Entourage, which truly is bad) but the user interfaces and feature sets of the Mac apps are different from the Windows versions in Office 2007 that I know. I find Open Office a more familiar experience on the Mac.
When I'm not in the office, I of course still need my e-mail, and I use, as I said, Outlook running in XP under VMWare Fusion for that. I upgraded my MacBook to 4GB just to give everything enough room (no problems with that, by the way). Outlook on my Mac works well, especially now that I have it set up so URLs I get in e-mail open up on Firefox on the OS X side of the machine, and e-mail links I see on the Web go straight to Outlook on XP, no matter which browser I'm in, on OS X or Windows.
I use Spaces to keep my Windows virtual machine visually separate from the OS X apps. I run it full-screen on its own desktop. I did try running Outlook in "Coherence" mode as an OS X-like app, but I find that putting Outlook in its own corner makes for a smoother cognitive experience.
I've avoided using any tools that purport to make a Mac more PC-like. I don't want to re-make OS X so it works like Windows. I'd rather learn, myself, how to work within the design of Mac. One concession I have made to my old habits is to install the Mac app Witch, which gives OS X an equivalent to the Alt-Tab task switching command on Windows. (The Mac's native Command-Tab shortcut Mac switches among open OS X windows, but not minimized ones, which Alt-Tab does on XP and Vista.)
More sync
I'm also a fan of apps that synchronize themselves over the Net. I take notes on Evernote, and since it syncs via its own servers, it really doesn't matter if I work on my Mac or my PC or on the iPhone app or the Web site. My data's just always in front of me. This is also true, of course, with pure Web apps like Google Docs--if you use these for productivity, you don't have to worry about keeping track of which files are where.
Foxmarks is a good tool for the multi-platform Web surfer. This little Firefox plug-in synchronizes your Web bookmarks and passwords across Firefox installations, no matter the operating system. I wish it worked with Chrome as well, though.
But why?
Am I more productive on my two-platform setup than I would be on a homogeneous configuration? Honestly, no. It's also more expensive- not just in terms of hardware but also the software licenses for all the extra Windows stuff on the Mac. I'm doing this experiment because my friends who are Mac users seem happier with their computing lives than the Windows people I know. I wanted a piece of that. It's also my job to understand technology platforms and products, and without hands-on Mac experience, I was missing an important perspective.
Now that I'm learning to live with the Mac, I can see why people like it. It's slicker, smoother, more enjoyable to use. I did learn the hard way, though, that moving from the PC to Mac is not something you can do overnight, nor in some cases at all--not if you want to maintain productivity. But if you have to use both platforms, it is possible to set up a system that not only lets you take advantage of the best of each world, but brings those worlds together in a way that makes them, just slightly, more than the sum of their parts.
Talkback Most Recent of 37 Talkback(s)
-
If there were a market for useless internet tips, then we'd have a recovery
I think the better way to work with apps on a Mac Desktop is to use
Hiding (Cmd-H) rather than minimizing and then Cmd-Tab will switch
properly. (As long as they were hidden in space you are using. Yes,
the not switching the space when trying to switch the application is an
annoyance.)
I don't know if they fixed this in Vista but Alt-Tab in Windows always
bothered me because multiple windows for each application got a
spot in the switch bar without there being any identification. The
rotation scheme seemed counter-intuitive to me, also.
Also, have you enabled your Mac for Windows File Sharing? That
would allow you to have a network place / shortcut to the Mac on the
Windows desktop
DannyO_0x9812th Feb 2009 -
F9, F10, and F11...
F9, F10, and F11. Arguably the three best keys on a Mac.
Expos? is
the best window management system by far. Well, in my opinion
anyway.
Also, don't forget to download Remote Desktop for OS X so you can
control your PC with it.
http://www.microsoft.com/mac/products/remote-desktop/default.mspx
olePigeon12th Feb 2009 -
not anymore...
they have changed around default keys... on newer keyboards and
laptops the only Expose key anymore is on the F3 key and is all
windows... right by Dashboard on F4.
but.. on the macbooks, you don't need F keys for expose... can do it all
from the touchpad, and its awesome. Four fingers up shows the desktop,
four fingers down shows all windows. Ever since i got my new Macbook
Pro thats about the only way i switch apps anymore, no key presses, no
moving my hand away from the trackpad.. just takes a fraction of a
second and have switched.
doh12313th Feb 2009 -
not necessarily
both my pro and air came default to the f keys - you can change back and forth to whatever you want in sysprefs.
adaeon13th Feb 2009 -
Alt-Tab Rotation Order
I don't know if they fixed this in Vista but Alt-Tab in Windows always bothered me because multiple windows for each application got a spot in the switch bar without there being any identification. The rotation scheme seemed counter-intuitive to me, also.
Alt-Tab in Vista (and Win 7) shows a thumbnail sized image of the app in question with the icon belonging to the app in the bottom right corner. XP showed only the icon with the title of the window in the bottom part of the alt-tab bar. I can see the potential for confusion, though... If you open two copies of Word or Excel and have started two brand new documents (document1.doc or book1.xls), both windows will be called the same thing. IE or Firefox is a bit less confusing - it will list the primary domain for the site you're visiting.
Alt-Tab order isn't too confusing. The most recently used app is on the left-most side. The least used or minimized app is on the right-most side. The 2nd icon is the one you used just before the currently focused window.
If you minimize the current window, it will go toward the back end of the stack. Makes sense... No..?
Wolfie2K313th Feb 2009 -
Use Which for ALT-TAB like function
The free download Which uses the Option-TAB combination to simulate the Windows-like ALT-TAB functionality. While I prefer the COMMAND-TAB functionality in MacOS X, I do use Which when I know I have multiple windows open in applications--like the browsers and Office.
sbarman16th Feb 2009 -
Confusing Keystrokes
Well, start with this ctrl=cmd, alt=option... in most situations this will do the trick. Platform specific operations that the different OSes do will of course be different, like the functions of the "windows" key. But take off through the finder file bar and learn some new stuff. I have been using both platforms for quite a while, and at first I would go to one or the other and press the wrong keys, but now muscle memory takes over and my hands automatically know which buttons to press.
GLORY! On to master Linux! Might not be a big enough geek though! Don't really use command line! I would like to learn though! Don't know why! Also don't know why I'm yelling! Maybe it's voice immodulation disorder!
Metronome4912th Feb 2009 -
mastering Linux . .
there is nothing to it until you need to make some change or install that's not in one of the pre-loaded packages . . . it appears that both Mac and Linux are basically designed so that the average user won't often need to do that and that when they do it's time to call somebody
eggmanbubbagee@...12th Feb 2009 -
You get the same problem in
Windows if the app programmer didn't create an install file for it or if you're trying to install an older DOS program. Good example is trying to install MASM or TASM. You have to edit the autoexec.bat and config.sys for the programs even under XP. Of course, if you're using one of them, then you're more than likely to know how to configure it. In some ways IMO it's more user friendly to make advanced programs (that are liable to screw up your machine if you don't know what you're doing) manual installs. Allowing a novice to install a disk editor (like the old Norton Utilities one where you could read/edit the raw contents of the disk) without having to configure it manually is a recipe for disaster. Perhaps that's why Microsoft has kept debug a commandline option all these years instead of creating a icon or shortcut for it.
alaniane@...13th Feb 2009 -
Ubuntu Linux Is Easy to Master
You don't need the command line to add or remove programs, because there is an application for doing that. It is called..."Add/Remove [Programs]."
But the command line is a powerful tool for even a medium-grade user like myself. I use mine to control, configure, and update my computers and network. I honestly don't know how I would get along without it!
barence77315th Feb 2009 -
the Mac is fun but . . .
having been using both myself now for a while I can see that a lot of the Mac attraction was the novelty of it - it's sort of an alternate universe, as if I am getting a rare glimpse of how personal computing evolved on a different planet - fun to explore, in some ways better, but in the end Windows is my home.
I enjoy tweaking my systems too much and being able to install all the latest apps - the walled garden has its place but I can't live there full time. I can certainly understand why Mac lovers might feel just the reverse and I can respect that more now.
BTW, setting up Synergy is a real hoot ain't it
_____________ is to the right of ________and . . .
eggmanbubbagee@...12th Feb 2009 -
The cool thing is that you can have a Mac and still use Windows...
The cool thing is that you can have a Mac and still use Windows when
you want to, especially for games. Why do you have to be confined by
walls?
"What's the matter? Never taken a shortcut before?"
olePigeon12th Feb 2009 -
Finally, Peered Reviews
Thanks to Rafe for some honesty and an attempt at peered
comparison of systems. Windows is understood better when
compared with something "other".
It's beginning to become clear to people that interoperability
within an open tech marketplace is preferable to a OS
monoculture, and the feudal market that supports it. But
Apple isn't open? No, of course not, but they are the only
shining example of peered, competitive, commercial
coexistence. Has it not always taken at least "two" to make a
marketplace? The only thing obliged to be open, was the
market itself. Ironically, the only hindrance to that, is
monopoly. Ring any bells?
It's also true that the logic gate is triumphing over the logo,
and people are beginning to understand that a nor gate
doesn't care who it's vendor is. Apple will run almost
anything now.
The future is clearly a multiplatform one. The Apple ads,
love them or hate them, always show both Mac and PC.
Either is ever shown alone. It's an essential truth some of us
recognize. Meanwhile the argument for the PC is increasingly
one on behalf of muscle memory over intellect. We will see if
this is to be a victory for the rational human mind, or a
victory for the worlds most powerful behavior modification
device.
Harry Bardal12th Feb 2009 -
Snow Leopard should help with your workflow...
Snow Leopard should help with your workflow, Apple has
taken great strides to make OS X work well with Exchange
and ActiveDirectory.
olePigeon12th Feb 2009 -
Why the hell are you being published?
I read your other article also I just want to say: How the hell did you get a journalism job? Are you getting paid?
proadventurer12th Feb 2009
Talkback - Tell Us What You Think
The best of ZDNet, delivered
ZDNet Newsletters
Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox




