What is UR txt msg str@tegy?
Summary
Topics
Two years ago my daughter, Anna, sent me her first text message. She borrowed her older brother’s mobile phone and composed this question, “Where R U” When the message arrived I was happy to know that she was thinking about me. My initial thought was to reply, “@ wrk”. Before sending a response, however, I considered the real meaning of my daughter’s question. I knew that my daughter was not actually interested in my physical location. She did not care if I was at my office, a client’s office, or a restaurant. She really wanted to know when I would be home. She wanted to know when she would see me. She cared about timing, not location. I replied, “@ wrk, b home in 30.”
As I meet with people in large enterprises throughout the U.S., I often ask the same question, “Where R U?” My question, like my daughter’s, is context sensitive. The broader meaning of the question is “Where is your text message strategy?” Or more pointedly, when will your organization begin using text messaging and other mobile messaging services in your marketing, customer care, and collections processes? Like my daughter, I am not asking about geography or political positioning, rather I am asking about timing? And, I have found that very few organizations in 2008 can answer this basic text messaging question.
No longer do American consumers lag the rest of the world in text message adoption. Text messaging has become the preferred communications channel for millions of people, and not just teenagers. For many people in America text messaging is considered indispensable.
The rise of mobile messaging
80 percent of all Americans currently carry mobile phones. There are more mobile-only households than landline-only households.
The volume of text messages sent in America doubles each year. As of mid 2007, Americans send over 1 billion text messages per day.
While U.S. consumers are fully embracing text messaging, very few enterprises have followed suit. It is true that some organizations have begun adoption, but there are others who continue to overlook the mobile data phenomenon entirely. If enterprises do not adapt to this channel they will, eventually and certainly, suffer a disadvantage to those organizations that catch the vision of mobile data communications and take full advantage of the channel.
I’ve spent many years working with large enterprises to help them define and implement their text messaging strategy. I believe there are five critical considerations an enterprise should consider when implementing mobile data communications:
Text Consideration #1: Get started.
Establish a presence in the text messaging channel. It would be foolish for any company to operate without an internet site. Similarly, the time will soon come when consumers expect basic text messaging services from the companies they know and trust. Consumers will expect visibility into account information, order status, store locators, FAQs, and more. Far too many companies do not support text messaging at all. The key ingredient for most companies is simply to get started.
Text Consideration #2: Demonstrate proficiency early.
Text messaging can be effective at all stages of the customer life cycle, such as marketing, customer care, and collections. By demonstrating to consumers that your organization has text messaging proficiency early in the customer relationship it is possible to fully leverage the channel throughout all the sub-processes of customer acquisition, support, and retention.
It is important that customers understand early on that your organization speaks the language of text messaging. This will increase the opt-in rate that your organization needs for the channel. Early proficiency enhances the usefulness and value of the channel in all downstream processes.
Text Consideration #3: Keep it short.
Text messaging is well suited for sending and receiving information that is relevant, timely, and brief. Consumers expect text messages to be highly relevant to their needs and interests. Unwanted or unnecessary text messages will damage customer relationships.
Timely delivery of information increases the value of information. No other communication channel can elicit an immediate response like text messaging. Consequently people expect information in the text channel to be timely.
By definition, text messages must be short and concise. If you cannot convey the message in 160 characters then the message is probably not well suited for text messaging.
Text Consideration #4: No need to remember.
Text messages are often stored for an extended period on the mobile device. So, when you send a text messaging containing detailed information it is easy to retain and easy to forward to another person. In contrast, detailed voice messages are cumbersome and time consuming. Consider, for example, the benefits of a text message I received from a friend a few months ago regarding the birth of a new child: “Announcing the birth of David Jason Bay, May 4, 10:38am, 8lb 5oz, 20inch, brn hair, brn eyes. Mom and baby healthy.” All the details were automatically retained on my phone. Furthermore, it was a snap to forward the message to another friend.
Text Consideration #5: Integrate all channels.
Text messaging rarely stands on its own. There are situations where a text messaging program may produce revenue or reduce costs independent of other communications channels but those programs are rare. In most cases text messaging is used to augment other communications. A great example of blended and integrated channels can be found on cellular 411 calls. When directory assistance finds the telephone number you requested it provides the option of receiving the information as a text message. The text message allows you to record detailed information without writing it down, it is automatically stored in the memory of the mobile phone.
Soon consumers will ask your organization, “Where R U?” When that time comes it will be important that you have fully considered the positioning of this important new channel in your organization. Text messaging will provide many profound benefits in marketing, customer care, collections and more.
I welcome your questions and comments on text messaging strategies. Please contact me if you require additional information or would like to engage in a deeper dialog. I can be reached at aberrey@soundbite.com.
biography
Alan Berrey is Vice President, Market Development, Text & Mobile Messaging for SoundBite Communications, a leading provider of integrated multi-channel communications.
Talkback Most Recent of 9 Talkback(s)
-
Simple app: error codes
I am dubious about the facility of SMS to deliver effective 1:1
marketing engagement, but suspect that having the ability to
text an error message (assuming a device can display an
error code, one abbreviated for use in SMS) and getting a
troubleshooting reply would be a welcome addition to many
products, from PCs to televisions to cars.
Mitch Ratcliffe8th Sep 2008 -
Shorthand for texting is fine, But...
I got an *email* reply from my corporate office (from a director!) when I sent in a detailed request for instructions on how to handle purchasing fuel for my personal vehicle that I was going to use on a business trip with the company AMEX card, then declare the IRS mileage as required by company policy on the expense report. (The accounting department just sent out an email blast that they would be paying the AMEX cards now instead of the cardholders.) Here is the reply:
----->
Are you saying that u will be reimbursed using miles x rate (available in concur) but any top up in fuel is at yr own exp since u will be reimbursed based on mileage?
U can use own card for petrol top up so that this trans wont come into concur. Alternatively if u use amex crop card, when trans appear on concur, file this as personal spend so co will not pay amex but u shd send payment directly to amex before due date.
Hope this is what u asked for
Rgds
------
Clearly, texting shorthand [or a hybrid thereof] does not belong in a corporate email environment (and sometimes in a customer-facing environment!) There are several things in the reply that are open to interpretation and if mis-interpreted could result in delays in getting reimbursed or worse.
I think you should have a care (and perhaps an English lesson or two) when using this form of communication.
rich.clark@...8th Sep 2008 -
RE: What is UR txt msg str@tegy?
This is another technology solution looking for a problem to solve. Like SOA and now WAO, more marketing hype to get business to spend more money on technology that tries to sovle a problem that doesn't exist.
T-Rexx8th Sep 2008 -
Like A Hole In the Head
That's how much I need another way for people to barge into my train of thought during the day. Coincidentally, see http://blogs.zdnet.com/careers/?p=174&tag=nl.e539.
The first company who starts using IM for sales and marketing has lost my business.
MichP15th Sep 2008 -
RE: What is UR txt msg str@tegy?
SMS is a means, not an end. Rather than developing a text-message strategy, just learn how it is used and to use it properly.
I would also like to betray my generation (X/Y) and say never use "lolspeak" or unprofessional abbreviation (a few TLA's may be in order) in a professional setting unless you have first built rapport and you are sure it can only improve on that rapport. It doesn't matter if it's a written letter, email, SMS, MMS, email from a mobile device, whatever... use correct grammar and use correct capitalisation (or "capitalization" in U.S. English).
It's not hard to do, especially if you take the time to learn how to use text-prediction properly.
Chris Fry
http://www.chris-fry.com
ChrisFry8th Sep 2008 -
RE: What is UR txt msg str@tegy?
The story also mentions using SMS for collections. I'll cancel my heavily relied on SMS service if that starts happening!
jimonline@...12th Sep 2008 -
RE: What is UR txt msg str@tegy?
All txt msgrs need to get a life !!!!!
gringotapatio@...15th Sep 2008 -
RE: What is UR txt msg str@tegy?
Every time I see some brainless twit text messaging whilr driving, I want to grab the phone shove it up an appropiate location. That's not possible of course, because that is where their head is at the moment. Motorist caught text messaging while driving should have their cars impounded and sold at auction. I don't text message and will not answer if sent one. It takes more time to text any meaningful conversation than it does to call or leave a voice message. A stupid, abbreviated one sentence messages is not communication, just another unnecessary irritation.
claudejones@...15th Sep 2008 -
Could not have said it better.
Nothing more need be said, except if people would learn to type, they could send an email instead just as fast.
5th Regimental Combat Team16th Sep 2008
Talkback - Tell Us What You Think
The best of ZDNet, delivered
ZDNet Newsletters
Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox




