Why Apple doesn't make a netbook
Summary: The clamor for Apple to join the netbook market continues to increase from all sides. But are the low-cost portable devices a fit for Apple's product line?
That's despite both Steve Jobs and interim CEO Tim Cook categorically denying that Apple is about to enter what has been described as a 'nascent' market.
Jobs has also suggested that the iPod Touch and iPhone is in essence a kind of netbook, based on what they are commonly used for. He's not fooling anyone though.
Starting from essentially zero market penetration in late 2007, by the end of last year, roughly 10 million netbooks have shipped, according to IDC. They now account for seven per cent of all portable PCs, an extraordinary growth rate in a short time.
See also: Installing Mac OS X on a Dell Mini 9 netbook
New iMac and Mac Minis on the lab bench
Battle for best high-end Mac OS X netbook
So what defines a netbook?
Jobs may have a point in that the Touch is great for web browsing and email, is lightweight, has wireless and is relatively cheap.
It's not ideal for office or productivity tasks. I'm a fan of the soft keyboard and will happily 'tap' out a hundred words or so of an email but a longer document is painful.
But at what cost? It's a loaded question.
Firstly, as Jobs claimed late last year, Apple doesn't know how to make a $500 Mac that 'isn't a piece of junk', as it's not in the company's DNA. Consider the current Mac Mini. A mere $100 above the $500 price point and it looks overpriced, probably because it is.
Secondly, Apple would undoubtedly sell bucket loads of shiny units if it did release a sub $500 OS X-powered netbook.
However, given the company would be competing in an aggressive and increasingly populated market with price being the key differentiating factor, its margins would be cut and its profits would suffer. An anathema to the Apple board.
Furthermore, sales of netbooks would cannibalize sales of higher margin, higher specification MacBooks, again resulting in more loss of profit.
Lest we forget, Apple has somewhere in the order of $28bn in cash thanks to its aforementioned high profit margin strategy and is well placed to sit out tough economic times and come out smiling the other side without compromising the same strategy.
Appealing to a customer who focused solely on price makes no sense to Apple. Someone who cares solely about price has a casual interest in quality and that is another anathema to the Apple brand.
Perhaps the very best reason to explain why Apple isn't bothering with netbooks for the time being was illustrated in a report from retail analysts Channel Checkers.
The firm surveyed Apple stores to track sales of iPod and Macs along with business trends at Apple stores in the US. According to their survey, 73 per cent of respondents said the top-selling computer was the MacBook Pro.
The top selling Mac in most Apple Stores surveyed was the high end MacBook Pro. The highest specification notebook Apple produces. In the US it retails between $2,000 and $2,800. Hardly low-cost netbook territory.
As we stand there are two reasons Apple isn't selling netbooks.
Firstly, Apple doesn't make netbooks because it can't work out how to make a notebook that can compete in that $500 space.
Secondly and more importantly, Apple doesn't make a netbook because, right now, it doesn't need to.
This article was originally published on silicon.com.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Netbook = cheap <> Apple = Overpriced
Again, Apple would NEVER compete on price in the netbook category.
Apple already has a netbook...
True! Very thin, but a bit bigger screen. I think that Apple will come out
Apple does not equate overpriced
Although I am aware this is still believed by most
people, Apple products are not overpriced. Just
yesterday I was reading a price comparison on the
iMac and competing al in one computers from
Dell and HP. For equal products, the iMac was
cheaper than the competition.
RE:Apple does not equate overpriced
I still run a G3...at $50
useful tool to the person who wants to run email, MS Office, Safari,
Photos, simple video editing, et al. Purchased years ago it's well worth
it's price.
Does anyone have data on how long a Mac really hangs around before
being replaced?
I reckon Apple look at it this way. Make a profit on the sale because
the customer won't think about renewing the product within 5 years.
Does the corporate sector do the same? Probably not. They roll over
computers at least every three years? I'm not sure of the logic behind
that. But if I were a school and budgeted for new PCs I'd try and keep
then working longer than three years even though the warranty may
expire.
Dunno about Macs
Most of the non-Vista machines in our company are coming up on 5 years old.
Tisn't just Macs that hang around... :)
A foolish thought.
My son is in education and research, therefor he has a Mac Pro. When he 1st started college, we got him an older low mile Chevy Nova, the car lasted 2 years. He asked me to help him find another car. I got him a Chevy Prizm, 11,000 on it. He blew the engine in it within 3 years.
He wanted to get a different car, I told him it didn't matter what he got because it wouldn't last. He claimed if he had bought a Toyota that would never have happened. I had to explain to him that both of his cars had been Toyota Corollas. He didn't change oil or check anything out on it.
The moral is, he bought an import engine for that 99 Prizm, learned how to take care of it. It is now 10 years old, with over a 100,000 miles on the engine and no problems.
Macs last longer because people take care of their fine machine. If people would take care of their PC it would last as long.
the other side
But should it?
What percentage do netbooks have to take to make Apple
take notice? They're at 7% now, maybe 10% by the
fall, 15% by next year? At what point does Apple
completely lose a mature netbook market by not
participating?
Keep a higher-specced macbook at $1199 and drop a
netbook at $799. I think they could do it, and I
think they will if netbooks continue to grow market
share.
Actually, Apple could make VERY good money at 599, and that is double the
How do you know they could make "VERY good money"?
Part of the argument from the Apple community is that the extra cost of Apple products is a direct result of the superior engineering and manufacturing of Apple products, which is reflected in the overall price.
Maybe Apple CANNOT make very good money below a certain point, and an ARM processor would not lower the overall cost in any significant way.
not their margin
are more like $400. An Apple netbook at $599
isn't going to maintain their desired profit
margin, in my opinion.
Since they rethink most of the niches they go
into, they'll do the same for netbooks, and
that won't come cheap.
Even at $699-799, they'd still have a price
point that is substantially below the macbook
but still sets them above the cheap netbook
crowd. Which would seem to be Apple's spot.
Money to finance itself
Apple needs cash to keep OS X and R&D advancing. So they will never try to compete on price.
Poor margins on netbooks.
Bingo. You are right, Apple will NOT compete on price in the Netbook market
I'm not sure you understand the point of a netbook
If Apple decides to compete on features like graphics (and I don't see how you fit best graphics AND best battery life together; there's usually a trade-off involved) and not price in a price competitive market, they're really not competing at all and are creating something completely different.
that's only half of it though
For a lot of people, me included, netbooks have a few huge advantages. They are very small, compared to regular notebooks. They can be easily put into your bag if you're a student, into a case if you're a travelling businessman, etc. They don't have to be the most powerful machines, as they're not used as your main machine (usually), but they are used on the road. So, they have to have long battery life.
I think that if Apple could come up with something that has the formfactor (small, ten inch screen) and great battery life (8 hours) combined with OSX and a relatively low pricepoint (for a macbook), let's say 700 to 800 dollars, I think they would have a winner. In fact, it might get some people who love the design of the macs, but who have never made the switch, finally switch, and then get an imac as their main home machine to work in tandem with their netbook. At least, that would be what would happen in my home.....
More Likely...
If they make it paperback size, with a color screen, and capable of
running any app the iPhone can, I suspect the demand for an Apple
netbook will be mostly filled.
Just add a standard USB keyboard for typing purposes. Or maybe Apple
will pull a rabbit out of their hat and add a pull-out keyboard.
With the touch screen ability it will blow away the Kindle II.
Why would I pay that kind of money
People will stop around $500 for a netbook, because more than that, you get into the capability factors. Mac will lose that factor in the low price competition.
How needs an operating system that will only work on a proprietary machine.