Nvidia launches $1,000 GeForce GTX Titan desktop graphics card
Summary: While based on the existing GK110 Kepler GPU, the new board is heavily tweaked to maximize performance while staying (relatively) cool and quiet.

In addition to debuting a new Tegra 4i chip with LTE capabilities, today Nvidia has also unleashed what it's touting as its most powerful single-GPU desktop graphics card ever. Dubbed the GeForce GTX Titan, it will set you back a cool $1,000, unless you are buying it as part of one of the new gaming systems featuring the card (see more below), which will cost you even more.
Unlike the similarly priced Nvidia GeForce GTX 690, which is comprised of two GPUs, the Titan is based on the GK110 "Kepler" architecture, though with some tweaks. Those include 6GB of GDDR5 video memory with a 384-bit memory interface, along with an enormous aluminum heatsink and a vapor chamber to cool things down. The company has also rolled out an updated version of its GPU Boost technology, which monitors temperature and power numbers and adjusts graphics performance accordingly to maximize efficiency.
While hard-core gamers will no doubt drool over the capabilities -- according to AnandTech, it promises "46% more shading/compute and texturing performance, 25% more pixel throughput, and a full 50% more memory bandwidth than [the] GTX 680" -- the Titan stems from the Titan supercomputer used by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory and based on Nvidia's GPUs. As such, AnandTech says the card could serve as an entry-level GPU compute product.
At the same time, Nvidia is hoping the Titan will spur the growth in small-form-factor gaming PCs. These range from Falcon Northwest's Tiki to Velocity Micro's Micro Raptor. Of course, you also have the option to hook three Titans togther in a triple SLI configuration, and that requires a traditional desktop tower like the Maingear Shift or a liquid-cooled Origin PC system.
One thing we don't know yet is how the Titan performs in third-party benchmark testing from independent sources. HotHardware points out performance results from reviewers are still under embargo. If it performs as expected, will the Titan be a success for Nvidia? Or is it just an expensive niche product? Let us know your thoughts in the Talkback section below.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
So the big question is...
..or is the whole "desktop is dead" sentiment still a tad premature?
Desktop gaming is dead
If you want one, buy it quick. I suspect they won't be around for very long at all. Maybe the Chinese will buy them in mass and make their next supercomputer out of them, but beyond that there just isn't a market. Sorry - too much, too late. Way too late.
PC gaming is NOT dead.
Secondly, please tell me what crack pipe you've been smoking? The entire PC market is NOT in the $300 range by a long shot. Chrome books are the ONLY laptops that cost $299 and those aren't good for anything but angry birds and facebook. Dude, you info is full of more fud than wallstreet!
On one hand...
Dude, people aren't spending $1000 on computers. And they're not spending $1500 on game systems. Not when they can get a Wii, Xbox, or PS3 for a FRACTION of that price. And, once more, they are certainly not going to spend $1000 on top of that for a graphics card.
Those days came and went a long, long time ago. Those days of computer swap meets, trade shows, etc. All gone. All kaputt. The market has shifted to laptops and tablets. Just try to tell yourself that home buyers are still buying desktop systems. You're nuts if you do.
And guess what - this $1000 graphics card isn't going to fit into your ESATA plug on the back of your laptop, now is it? Nor are you gonna sandwich it into the memory slot or the (rare) DVD drive bay, now are you. This card is for the 1 in 1000 users that might be mildly interested in upgrading his gaming rig and has an extra $1000 lying around. Know anyone by that name? Me neither - and believe me, I know them ALL.
They've moved on (and down) to the Xbox and PS3. That's it. End of story. Don't try to tell me that there's a market for desktops systems. Don't BS everyone here with tales of record PC sales. Not even Oscar Meyer would buy that beloney.
You can buy gaming PCs anywhere from $700-$10000
You can find monster gaming setups running $10,000 (liquid cooling, lighting, dual XEON, with 1000+Watt power supplies. Apparently people buy these things.
You won't see this kind of GPU compute power in a tablet for a long long time. These kinds of desktop GPUs were never intended to make it to Tablets. Tablets are a long way from the compute power of an i3 much less i5 or i7 and even the integrated graphics that come with these guys. We don't even have 64 bit yet!
As a non gamer...
I built a 8 core dual Xeon board for virtualisation about 18 months ago and came across an EVGA motherboard during my research that seemed to be designed for gaming - SLI cards, over locking, etc and I wondered then what kind of games people needed it for?
All enlightenment from knowledgable gamers welcome! (The only thing that's ever tested the board I'm referring to was a two hour movie rendering by a friend of mine that shoots in HD!)
As a gamer
MarnWill, there is an enthusiast market and too much is never enough, this goes for the PC market as much as any other.
As an avid gamer and an individual of modest means a $1000 video card as well as a $3000 dual Xeon set up is way beyond my means - but in a single second flat I would grab them and dance with you at owning a system like that!
My current system (starting with 2 GTX570s) is no slouch and here I give merit to your statements in that I havent come across any titles that would grief my PC. I cant think of any IMMEDIATE need for dual Xeon or 3-way SLI Titans and wouldn't be able to make any clear distinctions for you as to any advantages a system like that would afford a gamer, if any. Though the power potential in a system like that certainly future proofs those with the financial means.
With 4-6GB of memory more than enough for 98% of the software and games out now, there are still people buying 16, 32, 64 and even 128GB why? Because they can and why not if you have that kind of disposable cash.
In any hobby there are enthusiasts and with any enthusiast there will be (seemingly to non-enthusiasts) large amounts of excess and overkill.
Where as a weekend bicyclist is content with a $100 no-name bike.. rest assure the pros and wanna-be's alike can spend $500,000 on one.. I'll post the link for anyone else that thinks a half a mil bike can exist.. lol
http://www.bornrich.com/entry/world-s-most-expensive-bicycles-for-eco-luxurious-ride/
I can totally respect that.
I suppose I'm quite the build enthusiast myself, building far more than necessary for the fun of it; this Christmas I Built a replacement home office/theatre PC for someone seeing how small and quiet I could go with the mini itx form factor. It only needed an i3 which helped with cooling, but I managed to pack it all into a case roughly 10"x8"x16"
For me it's valve audio circuits; am/fm receivers, hi-fi amplifiers, guitar ampsand distortion. I can usually only afford to tinker , play with different components on breadboard, but every now and then I'm able to fund a real nice project. If I was able to blow a grand on a new hi-fi amp using some legendary tubes with all manner of analogue meter readout and eq... In a heart beat too!
Fully aware of being such a tech junkie and coverting PRE 70's tech... Maybe it's spending your working life with silicon that makes you want to build things completely free of it!!
As an exercise in what's possible I can totally see the sense in that evga board... No home server board I've ever used has 2 pci-e card slots, let alone sli/crossfire!
I love digital, but analog can be beautiful!
I might not express myself a colorfully a Jeffrey below, but he's right.. I can put a nice gaming rig together of about $700 - $800 and it certainly would be "mid-range". A $1000 rig, thought out right and shopped around for could basically run anything out there right now gaming wise without much trouble.
You don't need a Lamborghini to go grocery shopping, but its understandable that one doesn't want to be seen in a junker either.
Its in the best interest of Intel, EVGA, ASUS and the rest of the gang to convince you that a $2000 rig is the only option, but that just inst true.. there is no NEED for dual Xeon for even this Titan card. WANT and NEED are very different things.
On a final note, and this one is also strictly IMHO, is that the industry is heavily shaped and driven by the tinkerers and basically the type of people that CANT afford these kinds of cards.. the pursuit to find answers for not having $$$ often yields wonderful breakthroughs.. lol
Big mem machines
Save your money
You can BUILD you a gaming PC for 400-1000+
I have a gaming PC which is also a work station that is worth 750 bucks. It plays EVERY single game a throw at it with great frames. I am able to max out just about every game I play. Soon I'll upgrade the GPU, so really, it will soon be a 900 buck gaming PC.
My specs:
AMD Piledriver FX-6300 OC'd @ 4.3ghz
GPU: AMD Radeon HD 6950
RAM: G.Skill RipJaw X Series 8gb 1600mhz
This is way more than adequate for PC gaming.
$700 is VERY reasonable for a gaming rig
500W PS: $30
Mobo: $50
i5-3470 CPU: $150
8G RAM: $50
1TB HD: $60
Medium grade video card (AMD 7850, GTX560ti etc) $200
misc (keyboard, mouse, speakers): $50
$640 total
Add a monitor:
$22" 1080p monitor: $100
Total: $740.
On that you can play any modern game in at least medium gfx settings at 1080p, except maybe the latest incarnation of Witcher.
Admittedly I'd spend another $200 or so getting a better CPU/Mobo but the extra money spent on $599 video cards etc makes little sense for most games.
PC gaming has basically gone fully digital
Rocko6r you have NO idea.
When I win the lottery
Wow
7 Series vs 6 Series
I always
I will return to using an nVidia GPU next time i upgrade systems.
This GTX Titan is the stuff of dreams for most PC gamers.