Office 365 after a year: Worth it or not?

Office 365 after a year: Worth it or not?

Summary: ZDNet's David Gewirtz explores the offerings provided by Office 365 and shares with you, after a year of use, what aspects of the service proved to be valuable and what aspects proved to be either annoying or baffling.

SHARE:
TOPICS: Microsoft, Cloud
71

Office for iPad, iPhone, and Android

My ZDNet colleague James Kendrick calls Office for iPad one of Microsoft's finest moments

I use the built-in email application on my Android and iOS devices to access my Office 365 email. Microsoft's OWA app is terrible by comparison, with big rows and minimal useful information inside the glossy interface.

I don't have much use for Office for iPad (even though I can download it for free) because I don't have a good way to link OneDrive or OneDrive for Business into my daily workflow. See my discussion about OneDrive on the previous page.

Finally, my Chromebook beats the pants off of my iPad as a go-out-and-about device. It's both less expensive and runs full Chrome, along with my extensions. I need Chrome far more than I need Office on the iPad.

I'm a very active PowerPoint user, but I don't work on PowerPoint presentations when I'm out because I have a very large media asset library that lives on my LAN and create very big PowerPoint files. So even a moderately good PowerPoint on the iPad doesn't provide me with much value.

After a year: Microsoft has clearly improved its mobile offerings. I just can't find myself caring.

I'll let James Kendrick judge Office for iPad, and he's very happy with it. I still think Office for iPad is crippled -- like the rest of Office -- with the inconsistent account and identity management foisted on users by OneDrive and OneDrive for Business, Microsoft accounts, and Office 365 accounts.

SharePoint and OneNote

I can't tell you how excited I was when I got Office 365 and, by virtue of my subscription, now had a full SharePoint installation.

I don't use it. At all. I haven't been able to convince my colleagues to use it with me.

I also don't use OneNote, even though it's substantially improved over the year. Instead, I use Evernote. Had OneNote been as good as it has gotten before I dumped all my stuff in Evernote, I might have used it. But now that I'm invested in Evernote, it's just too much work to move things to OneNote.

After a year: I haven't been able to convince a single collaborator to use SharePoint. Everyone is fully comfortable with Google Drive, and just about everyone I work with shares documents via Google.

I judge SharePoint disappointing. You need other people to be able to use this product and SharePoint is being left in the dust by other collaboration tools, at least among the people I work with.

Lync

Lync is Google Hangouts and Skype... on steroids. Unfortunately, it has a terrible client for Mac use, and I do all my video conferencing on the Mac.

Update: This critique has been corrected based on feedback from Microsoft. When I originally started using Office 365, Lync and Skype couldn't talk. Since then, that has changed. See my notes below.

Once again, contacts become an issue, because Skype doesn't share contacts with Lync, and you can't use Lync to talk to Skype users. As a result, if you're going to do a Lync conference, everyone has to have Lync, and except for a few Microsoft employees I know, very few people ever use the product.

After a year: Lync's integration hasn't improved.   I was just informed by Microsoft that, "Lync and Skype are currently federated for IM, presence and voice calls and have been since May 2013 (this link provides full description). Lync users add Skype contacts by typing their Skype users’ Microsoft account names into the Add Skype Contact window in Lync."

I judge this to be another missed opportunity good progress, but it's interesting that as an Office 365 user and a Skype Premium customer, I never got any "in my mailbox" notification of this change. Apparently, it was posted on a blog entry, but outreach to at least this customer didn't make it.

Overall dollar value

After a year, has Office 365 been worth it? Given the fact that I use roughly a third of what my subscription offers, I still consider it worth the money.

Google Apps doesn't offer the depth of Microsoft's desktop applications and given that I'm a very heavy PowerPoint user, I'd still need to buy Office. Also, even though none of the desktop applications have seen an upgrade in far too long, the desktop Outlook experience is still far more convenient for me than Gmail.

So, without a doubt, Office 365 is worth the price. The big disappointment is that it could be so much better... if only it didn't suffer from Microsoft's usual baffling product management decision making.

Now that OneDrive for Business offers a terabyte of storage, I will do a test install of OneDrive for Business and run some tests to see if it damages any of my important files. If the service doesn't completely suck, it's just too good a deal to dismiss without at least some investigation.

Would I advise you to invest in Office 365? Well, that depends on which ecosystem you rely on. If you've got a long history of relying on Microsoft, then Office 365 is a good deal, if a bit frustrating. But then, if you've got a long history of relying on Microsoft, you're used to getting reasonably good software served with the occasional heaping helping of annoyance.

Bottom line, though, if you add up the suite of desktop apps, the Exchange and SharePoint services (whether used or not), the 1TB of online storage, and all the fixin's, Microsoft is certainly providing value. I'll keep using the service for another year.

What about you? Have you been using Office 365? Has it proven to be valuable to you?

By the way, I'm doing more updates on Twitter and Facebook than ever before. Be sure to follow me on Twitter at @DavidGewirtz and on Facebook at Facebook.com/DavidGewirtz.

Topics: Microsoft, Cloud

About

David Gewirtz, Distinguished Lecturer at CBS Interactive, is an author, U.S. policy advisor, and computer scientist. He is featured in the History Channel special The President's Book of Secrets and is a member of the National Press Club.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

71 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Not fond of the licensing model.

    Most of the interactions I have with office are from colleagues that have difficulty opening current office XML-based formats, so it makes little sense to upgrade from 2010, the last version of a perpetual licensing model. Not enough new features to pay annual fees on for me. Then again, I tend to buy application software in 2x revisions and OSes current.
    DAMANgoldberg
    • Not totally correct

      2012 is the last version you could get a perpetual license. You could get it both ways. I find there were enough improvements to jump form 2010 to 2012. Not sure if going from 2012 to 365 makes much difference. Also, I have never had any problems with the XML-format.

      Between my wife and I we work on 5 different computers. One has the 2012 perpetual and the other 4 are 365. It is great now to have Office on everything and not just a few of the computers. We use OneDrive heavily. It really ties all the computers together beautifully.

      The author David Gewirtz who admittedly used only 1/3 found it worth the money. We probably use about 2/3 and find it an even better value. If you have a lot of computers then Office365 is a bargain.
      MichaelInMA
      • I believe it is 2013

        I believe it is Office 2013, not 2012, that has a perpetual license.
        KarterJK
  • The software licensing model works only for Fortune 500 companies, IMO.

    All other individuals can receive the same Office App value from bundled Office Suite apps - for example, those versions of Office included in Surface ARM tablets or Intel Atom powered 8" tablet models.

    I suspect, David, that had you purchased a Dell Venue 8 Pro (as I did) and used it with an extended monitor from one of your large screen display units (with a blue tooth keyboard and mouse to complete the system), you would have derived just as much value from that version of Office as you did with your Office 365 subscription version. (BTW, I also have Office 365 and have been wondering, lately, WHY I still have it.)

    Besides, in two years, you would essentially receive a free tablet in lieu of continuing your Office 365 subscription.
    kenosha77a
    • Office for Home & Student on Dell Venue 8 Pro

      is not to be used for business so this is not a valid point to make to the author. It also lacks a monitor output but maybe you could use Miracast.
      ve3meo
  • No Thanks

    Rent model does not work out to value for the consumer.
    Roody15
    • It's a service

      that you subscribe to. Not any different than other subscription plans in all areas of life.
      kstap
      • Lease vs buy decisions are very common, what's different

        here is that the option to buy has been removed. Therefore, one can't judge which pathway offers better value. Unlike a public utility such as the electric company or cable TV company, there are no regulatory constraints on what could be charged for this bundle, which suggests that once the purchased copies of Office have largely disappeared, there's nothing stopping MS from raising subscription prices substantially. The only way to stop this is to decline to subscribe and seek alternatives. For some, that's not going to work out very well, for others, it very well might, it depends on how wedded to some special features of Office that aren't well or at all duplicated elsewhere.
        WhatsamattaU
        • Model

          David G. brings up some good points. I use Visio and Project extensively plus some serious PP for ERP Change Management. This alone makes 365 a dead issue. For me.
          rhonin
        • LibreOffice will stop subscription price craziness...

          It keeps getting better and better, and it does all the basic MS formats. Yes, there are differences, so if you have to have a certain thing LibreOffice doesn't do, buy something that comes with an Office 365 license.
          ClearCreek
    • It depends. The more computers you own at a time, the less you will ...

      ... spend by subscribing. If you typically keep a PC for five years and you only own one PC, subscribing to Office 365 Personal will save you about $50.

      If you own two PCs, and you use Office Professional, over five years, your subscription to Office 365 Home will save you $300. Over seven years, you will still save $100 by subscribing.

      If you own three PCs (not uncommon in families with kids), over five years, you would save $700. Over seven years, you would save $500.

      If you own five PCs, over five years your subscription would save you $1500. Even if you only needed Office Home & Student, your subscription would save you $200. Over seven years, you would still break even.

      Unless your needs are very limited, subscribing is a very good deal. Of course, there are (and will always be) less expensive alternatives to a subscription to Microsoft Office. But if it is Office you want, Microsoft is offering a very attractive option.
      M Wagner
      • math?

        Office 365 Personal cost US$70/year. Office 2013 Home & Student costs US$80. Both are NONCOMMERCIAL USE licenses? Were you comparing the Office 365 Personal apple to the Office 2013 Professional orange?
        hrlngrv 
    • No Thanks - More for functionality

      Okay, so I do lean more towards the "buy" side of things, but really that on it's own really only is a leaning, which can be overcome by how good the SERVICE is.

      But really Office 365 AS A SERVICE is not worth renting. Here's why, using David's own words...

      David mentions something in passing that is a HUGE headache when you're using Exchange alone: "Spam management is mediocre"... The fact that he's gotten so used to it that it doesn't bother him that much speaks to how much a person can tolerate given enough time. Once I put a real antispam product (ASSP which is free and highly recommended) in front of our Exchange service, people were amazed at how little spam got through. Google's antispam is even better than that. SPAM is a huge time waster, so as a SERVICE, Exchange is a FAIL for that one point alone. I tolerate Exchange as a PRODUCT because I can modify it's configuration, putting another service in front of it.

      "Office 365's support services to be barely tolerable" Ummm... yeah, this plus #1 would already be prompting us to evaluating alternatives

      Since Exchange Service is a joke, and Support Service is a joke, then there is no value in them, and thus David is really spending $360/year for Office software... Software that worked just the same in 2010 as it does now, and which he could have bought for about $120 OEM, 4 years ago. So lets see... 6 licenses, and lets just bump it up a little to $150 each, is $900 for Office software that works for at least 5-6 years. OR pay $1440 over the past 4 years for the same mediocre software...

      This is only on the first page, and it shows Office365 as a FAIL.
      Technical John
  • I like to "own" my software...

    I pay enough to Time Warner, Verizon, Netflix and other "product as a service" companies. I want to OWN my software.
    ribzilla
    • I understood that you only own a license to operate software.

      I think the only way you can OWN software is to create it. If it is copyrighted by you then you can do with it as you wish.
      Then there is open source. You can't OWN that because it is public.
      nesdave
      • Yes, but you know what he means. Pay me now or pay me later.

        The bottom line is that the more computers you own, the more you save by subscribing. Most people (and businesses) get five to seven years out of their computers. Microsoft has fashioned a break-even point of 3 to 5 computers over five to seven years depending upon which edition of Office you would otherwise buy.
        M Wagner
        • Not home users

          Most home users I know got by for 5+ years with the one to three installs of a $129 copy of Office Student and Teacher addition. Office 365 is not a good value for the majority of these people.
          rbgaynor
          • I agree and would go further

            I only use Word and XL at work. At home, for the one or two letterS I have to write each year - wordpad would suffice. I actually haven't had to write anything major since I got out of college. Open Office works fine for my limited needs (I find Libre Office too slow). I haven't purchased an office suite in 14 years - last one was Corel Office (Word Perfect) because it was 1/8 the price of the student MS Office at the time and suited my college essay needs just fine.



            I suspect this is the way most people are. Office productivity suites just aren't used much at home. If I started a home business however and had to collaborate with others then I think this Office 365 suite can be beneficial. As for MS cloud services I am pretty happy with One drive - though it would be nice if they matched Amazon and Googles cloud drive pricing.
            marque2
    • Things are changing

      Yours was the prevailing sentiment ten years ago when subscription services were first tried and failed.

      Today more people seem willing and even excited to use them because of the convenience of storing things on the cloud. I think it has to do with the fact that internet connections are much more mature now, more reliable and fast enough to be useful.

      Still, I totally understand where you're coming from.
      vincewansink
      • True, the cloud's the thing

        but only if storing and retrieving files is as seamless and elegant as Dropbox. Microsoft blew it as soon as they created business vs consumer silos and followed non-parallel paths for each. To me that's incomprehensible.

        For sure your Fortune 500 company has it's own license and locations and if you have a personal license as well those files won't be in the same location. But it should all work the same way and be transparent to you. Google has that and so does Apple for it's limited cloud offerings.
        Technologist6