One of the questions I'm frequently asked is: "If perimeter-based data-security strategies are breaking down, why aren't more companies using encryption to protect their confidential information?"
Although I'm not sure I agree completely with the question's premise, I believe what we're seeing has less to do with the role encryption will play in protecting confidential information than the rate at which enterprises can really upgrade their core information infrastructure.
Encryption is not the kind of technology that can be "painted on" an existing set of information-technology assets. Achieving comprehensive enterprise data protection requires a change in both policies and technology at the architectural level, followed by deliberate deployment everywhere sensitive information resides.
As one of my favourite chief information officers observed: "Rome wasn't built in a day, and that was a far easier goal to accomplish."
What I've observed, particularly in the last year, is the growing understanding by IT security professionals that General Patton was correct when he observed that "fixed embattlements are monuments to human stupidity".
With the vast majority of mission-critical data now being created and consumed on mobile devices outside most corporate security perimeters, data-security experts globally have realised that fixed data embattlements are a necessary but insufficient component of a comprehensive, enterprise data-protection strategy. These companies are rethinking their security strategies, and the leading firms — primarily in financial services and manufacturing — are implementing solutions that assume there is no perimeter in the classic sense. Most, if not all, of these new approaches involve broad deployment of various encryption technologies.
The Jericho Forum has been promoting this concept of "de-perimeterisation" for a number of years. What I'm seeing from the largest PGP Corporation customers is a belief that security now must travel with the data wherever it goes throughout the world. Because upgrading the security policies and technology in a large enterprise takes time and careful planning, however, this is not the type of trend that pops out fully formed — like a YouTube or Facebook — but evolves over time to address changing threat models.
So, although de-perimeterisation and the assumption that all firms are vulnerable are the current drivers for encryption adoption, there's a third, less understood phenomenon that I believe will become increasingly important in the next two years: the hard dollar costs of a breach.
TJX disclosed recently that it may spend $500m (£253m) mitigating the effects of the breach. The most recent study by the Ponemon Institute, which tracks the cost of breaches, estimates that each compromised record costs an affected company $197, up eight percent from 2006 and 43 percent from 2005.
I expect both the number of breaches and the cost per breach to increase in the short term as the profitability and frequency of identity theft rise in the increasingly organised international criminal community. This trend will, in turn, put increasing pressure on public and private institutions to protect sensitive data regardless of where it resides in the enterprise.
The final factor affecting the rate at which encryption technologies are deployed is the knowledge that to protect all data in motion and at rest in a large enterprise effectively, it isn't enough to deploy one point solution for email, one for laptops, a third for shared storage, and so on. Most chief information officers know from hard experience — and early public key infrastructure deployments — that a combination of such point solutions usually leads to data that is actually less secure and/or less available to those who need it.
Encryption by itself is not the answer, and the fact is that building or deploying a simple, single-application encryption technology just isn't that hard. The magic of enterprise data protection occurs when it is combined with a comprehensive data-protection policy and key-management system, and encompasses all of an enterprise's business, compliance and security requirements.
Building systems that meet these criteria is hard and should be undertaken only when implementers truly understand all of the enterprise's threat models and have identified the most cost-effective, scalable solutions.
Phil Dunkelberger is chief executive of security software company PGP Corporation.