Photos: OLPC, Classmate and Eee

Photos: OLPC, Classmate and Eee

Summary: How do the three leading education-orientated ultraportable notebooks stack up? Take our visual tour to find out.

SHARE:
7

 |  Image 14 of 14

  • Thumbnail 1
  • Thumbnail 2
  • Thumbnail 3
  • Thumbnail 4
  • Thumbnail 5
  • Thumbnail 6
  • Thumbnail 7
  • Thumbnail 8
  • Thumbnail 9
  • Thumbnail 10
  • Thumbnail 11
  • Thumbnail 12
  • Thumbnail 13
  • Thumbnail 14
  • Intel Classmate
    Intel's Classmate is built around the 90nm Celeron M Ultra Low Voltage 353 processor running at 900MHz. It has a 400MHz frontside bus linking it to the Mobile Intel 915GMS Express chipset, which includes the Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 900 graphics module. Like the OLPC, the Classmate has a moderate 256MB of RAM, but Intel's system has double the solid-state storage capacity of the OLPC XO at 2GB. Again, there's an SD card slot for storage expansion.

    In passing, it's worth noting that Intel clearly does not expect the average user to modify or otherwise tinker with the Classmate's innards: to expose the motherboard for the above picture, we had to remove more than 20 screws and detach the screen — a process that took the best part of an hour.

     

  • ASUS Eee
    Like the Classmate, the ASUS Eee is built around the 900MHz Intel Celeron M ULV 353 and the 915GMS chipset, although it comes with a more generous 512MB of RAM. The 2G Surf model shown here has 2GB of solid-state storage, although more expensive 4GB and 8GB models are available. As with the other two notebooks, storage expansion via an SD card slot is available.

     

Topics: Laptops, Hardware, Reviews

About

Charles has been in tech publishing since the late 1980s, starting with Reed's Practical Computing, then moving to Ziff-Davis to help launch the UK version of PC Magazine in 1992. ZDNet came looking for a Reviews Editor in 2000, and he's been here ever since.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Related Stories

Talkback

7 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Am I retarded...

    ...or is there no way to get to the next page of the article? All I see is "In the following pages we take a comparative pictorial look at the OLPC XO, Intel Classmate and ASUS Eee" and then... nothing.
    anonymous
  • Nevermind

    I see how it works.

    Worst. Navigation system. Ever.
    anonymous
  • XO available

    TFA mentions "Production XO laptops (above, left) became available in November 2007". Are they still available? I'd love to get one for my kid but onl heard about give-one-get-one the day after it ended...
    TheRealBubba
  • Navigation is terrible

    I agree whole-heartedly with this comment.

    The intra-story navigation is *so* bad it would make Jacob Neilson's lamb-chops curl.

    Please consider making the image navigation independent of the article itself and stick to 'Next>>' or '1|2|3' links at the bottom of each page.

    Also, surely it's only necessary to give credit to the photographer once. The pix ain't that good.
    dogStar5000
  • Navigation etc.

    We mustn't offend Mr Nielsen must we? -- so we'll take a look at the navigation issue. The photos have been suitably de-credited too.
    Charles McLellan
  • It's not JN you offended

    Charles,

    It is not Jakob Nielsen you offended, it is us, your readers and your users and, frankly, we are your audience so you better pay attention, as JK would no doubt tell you. Piss off the audience and they refrain from returning.
    We are highly intelligent, web savvy people who can't find our way through your article (which frankly, would do well to be organised in a much better way) and it is not our fault. You want to tell me I'm wrong because the street sign isn't legible or are you going to accept responsibility for an unhelpful and some may say unnecessary navigation system.

    The web has moved on since 2000 and us users like sleek, fast, well organised content in an uncrowned environment, with semantically structured documents, code that complies to web standards and an interface that takes us humans into account, not the software that delivers the page.
    have a look at http://www.webstandards.org/, http://www.alistapart.com/, http://www.zeldman.com/, http://www.useit.com/ and listen to your audience, not snipe at them

    So snarky comments aside, we're only here because the content is good, but I, for one, spend much less time here than I used to because the sight is so disastrously slower, more complicated more crowded, much, much less accessible, much less usable, much more unhelpful than it used to be for little or no benefit.
    joe@...
  • As promised...

    You'll be pleased (I hope) to see that we've improved the navigation on photo galleries. Keep the comments coming!
    Charles McLellan