10 web design tragedies
Summary: Todd Fluhr found ten websites to represent some of the worst design tragedies on the Internet -- from sites of the well-known (J.K. Rowling and George E.R. Martin) to the obscure.
Image 2 of 10

Ignore for a moment the horrible design, the hodgepodge assortment of content, ads, and general insanity. Give this site a casual scroll. Go ahead. Scroll down. I dare you. Scroll like your life depended on it. Faster, I say, faster! Quite the journey, wasn't it? At the bottom we finally reach Mr. Ling's personal assurance that, "The rest can be a little confusing although in a few (business) cases can be appropriate." Trying to understand this in context has actually hurt my brain.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
template pack
RE: 10 web design tragedies
At least ZOMBO.COM is clean ....
....compared to zdnet.com!
I tolerate this site because of the information,
but dang! It is hard to navigate!
RE: 10 web design tragedies
First rule of websites design - test / test / test. This one works!
LOL at Ling Cars
Her style was/is, er... outrageous, but it works. It is refreshing to see such an individual make a success. But the web site is bad! LOL
RE: 10 web design tragedies
#11 http://www.buffalowildwings.com/
RE: 10 web design tragedies
RE: 10 web design tragedies
Another website designed by people who want to show off the cool things they can do.
They do make good wings though
RE: 10 web design tragedies
RE: 10 web design tragedies
One additional problem on the web is the simple fact that things don't die. I had a website on my last dial-up provider that was still up more than a year after they went out of business. I couldn't take the damn thing down. J.K. Rowling now has Pottermore, and I wonder if someone has just forgotten to take down the old site? Seems like it should have been gone long ago, but if someone doesn't actually shutdown the site, it may stay up for a very long time...abandoned....neglected....poor website....well, okey maybe not, but you get the idea.
. . . and ZDNet
Web galleries that reload the entire page, with thumbnails that are barely visible.
A "Talkback" section that itself seems to be designed in the '90s, barely usable. Threaded conversations with strange limits, and anti-spam technology that catches more false positives than spam. Makes me wonder if the webmaster for ZDNet ever looked at Facebook or Google+, or is keeping up to date with the latest anti-spam technology, which has improved greatly since the '90s.
RE: 10 web design tragedies
RE: 10 web design tragedies
Enterprisemission.com?
Come on, look who the people he caters to are - to them this [b]is[/b] a beautifully done website. ;)