Anatomy of an animated cursor attack
by ZDNet Author | April 6, 2007 11:10am PDT | Image 1 of 9
Previous | Next
The source of the problem
Animated cursors are a feature that allows a series of frames to appear at the mouse pointer location instead of a single image. The Animated Cursors feature is designated by the .ani suffix.
Image source: F-Secure.
Just In
In the mean time, why don?t you try posting something useful. Inciting anger in a discussion forum is kind of immature, don?t you think?
Only you could defend the original poster and define the ABMer crowd. I hope they are happy to have a poster child like you, it only proves once again that ABM also means Absent Brain Matter.
Anything associated with Microsoft will have it's problem .
As for me , I defend Steve Jobs , the liberator , the true leader , let's see if Bill Gates will follow suit now . There is alot of talk concerning Plays For Sure and the Zune , all the real news can be found at the BBC folks http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6520801.stm .
As for Xunil , I take every word of his like I take every word of No-Axe , Loverock Davidson , and any other schmuck whose only defense is to belittle others that don't fit into their politics . I take your words and wipe my as* with it .
"In a world without walls and fences , who needs windows and gates ."
"As for me , I defend Steve Jobs , the liberator , the true leader"
Careful there... you're sounding a wee bit like a Jim Jones fanatic.
Hey genius, do you live in a house, or apartment, homeless shelter, etc?
Does it have walls?
Do those any of those walls have windows in them?
At my house they do.
And gee... when I came to work this morning, I had to stop and swipe my ID to get THROUGH THE SECURITY GATE IN THE FENCE.
Your "quote" is as stupid as you are... almost.
Try this on for size:
If the world of computers) had no (fires)walls or (spyware de)fences, there would be no need for (MicroSoft) Windows, or (Bill) Gates.
Get it now, Richard (as in Dick) Wahd (as in "wad")
Why yes, yes I have. And that's not what that 'tard was doing.
Try this on for size:
If the world of computers) had no (fires)walls or (spyware de)fences, there would be no need for (MicroSoft) Windows, or (Bill) Gates.
LMAO... wow... that was quite the stretch to make up something to fit into there. And I'll bet you don't even realize how idiotic what you wrote is.
Congratulations, you've just made yourself appear as stupid as the other mental giant.
Make another wacko reply if you want, but I'll not waste my time reading it.
Good day.
...I'll stick with OS X and Linux.
BTW, John, your personal attacks show how incredibly weak you really are. If you want us to think less of you, keep it up.
Would you like some Kool-Ade now?
Automatic updates will break applications, even ones from Microsoft, and IT/IS departments do extensive testing of these updates before applying them to computers at work.
I have had a Windows machine (Server 2003) fail to boot because of an update. A simple "Boot to last know good configuration" fixed the problem.
I have worked in an IT department..... for the last 13 years.
Now, please stop assuming. You might want to consider that your experience with Windows OSes is not everyone's experience.
They actually call you "Intel"?
"I'm fed up with these people."
Perhaps you should find another line of work then.
Everything else you stated is either untrue (you've never used Macintosh, have you?) or unrealistic (people, by nature, are stupid and want to open EVERYTHING; this is why we have virus outbreaks like we do). BTW, patching Windows is like playing Russian roulette - every once in a while, you get that one update that will break an application (how many times has this happened with MSIE over the last couple of months?) or the whole Windows installation (I know enough people that got the BSOD when upgrading their XP service pack). If you want to risk automatic updates, that's fine. I prefer to do my updates when I tell the computer to do them, so I know if any patches break any programs or the OS itself.
The danger is Real! The Danger is Microsoft!...
And you want to elect a marketer as God huh - Steve Jobs. If Apple can rebadge something, he'll market it.
And I'm oh so worried about the ani exploit - oops what do you know - patched without me doing anything. If the Mac even get's near double figures usage they may have a market for the bad guys, until them keep your head in the sand and keep Apple lying in its adverts. Totally secure OS, no UAC equivalent and Apple invented the MP3 player and they never ever ripped off anything from Xerox. Best of all you only need one mouse button and one ever changing menu at the top of the screen.
The mushroom principle keep the users in the dark and feed em s**t. Glad to see it's working...
In a world full of intelligence and logic - why do we need you?
you can read about them all over the net they get patched and you guys put your heads in the ground and act like your untouchable but any one who has any kind of tech training at all knows any OS can be exploited
my self I've been working on and competing for well over 23 years and i have never had a virus' worm or any thing else to speak of..
the reason you guys are not hit any more than you are is you are just a small blip on the number of computers on the internet.
what does that mean your just not work the time if and thats a big IF apple ever gets out of the single digits of the % of desktop users then it will be Worth the virus and worm writers to get you
and you know what you will be easy pray you know why because everyone knows mac users are about as dumb as it gets when it comes to security matters and since social engineering is the tool used that gets 99% of the unwanted software on your computer you guys will be easy pickings
and i ask you what do you think the updates you get for what kind of kitty cat is mac using right now for the name of there OS. well anyways the updates are for exploits and OS bugs
but like i said when you hold such a small % of the desktop market share no one really cares enough to write about it and on the mac site they are cult follower to so they keep there mouths shut
BTW, jus a thought - if you wish to call Mac users dumb, you should really work on grammar and syntax.
I would be more cautious if I were you, Intellihence-you might dislocate your shoulder that way.
(Sorry, I saw terrorize in that last post and couldn't help it.)
Just as any story regarding MS gets ABM roaches to creep out and join them. Good work!
I'm new to this site, so I must confess that I have never heard of you. Somehow I managed to struggle along.
I am awaiting eagerly the release of your new bullet-proof OS.
The point being that it takes no skill or talent to whine and throw rocks. A few helpful notions might be a refreshing change ("get Linux" does not qualify).
Not aiming at you personally, but the whole class of those who seem to get a thrill out of putting down those less fortunate.
Does anyone have anything constructive to add to the discussion about cursor attacks?
I for one would be highly interested in thoughtful discussion about how we can eradicate the usenet nd internet of such irritations. It's bad enough that we constantly have to create new filters to thwart spam from filling our inboxes to overflowing. Let's instead of priding ourselves on how crash proof one Os is over the other come up with a concerted effort for ALL camps to attck a common foe. The cretains who create these malwares and security expolits.
Then the one who successfully manages to slay this final hydra can truly boast that he has the best OS.
Windows/Vista allows? Yes, I believe my OS is the best. If I put my thinking cap on,
however, I just cannot...for the life of me...understand the M$ users mindset. OK,
definitely better gaming. But is that the ONLY reason to stay with an OS that is
buggy, insecure, and...let's face it...dangerous? So, if it's gaming, isn't the purchase
of a Wii, or PS3, or whatever a better option? I mean, I am REALLY stumped! Of
course, OMHO.
As for the Mac and Microsoft bashing in this thread? Folks, face it: Neither OS is perfect, and both are being exploited. If Microsoft and Apple had equal market share, the Mac OS would be just as fragile as Windows has proven to be. And the one-button Mac mouse? I've never been keen on the idea. Give me a 3-button mouse and OS/task shell capable of understanding chording so I don't have to use both the keyboard AND mouse to do everyday things any day. (and yes, XWindows (*nix) does understand chording. Has for years now.)
It's curious to see how little progress there is in the Windows camp, actually. Just about every other OS has had a VDM (Virtual Desktop Manager) for years now. Windows still doesn't have one, unless you use a third-party Explorer replacement or Microsoft's lame and very brain-dead VDM... (Come on. Two desktop support? Gimme six at least!) I've been known to use up to nine before, actually.
As for security? Vista fails that test, too. (Big surprise there. NOT!) Linux and the BSDs may not be perfect, but they do have a better track record for security. I expect I'll be installing Linux soon, rather than use Vista.
But - put your thinking caps on - why does a mac get less viruses than Windows? Why does Windows get more viruses than any of the other OSes? First, consider that program compatability isn't always guaranteed with one or the other, as some are made specifically for one operating system. This would - if I'm not horribly mistaken - seem to show that each operating system works in a different way to the next one.
Now consider that Windows has a 90% share in the market, for two reasons: Dell ****** it out to everyone, and I know very few people who don't get their computer from dell; and as Dell does so, more people know about it, the word spreads, and everyone wants (and gets) Windows. Hell, quite a lot of people don't even know what a Mac is (That's the quite a lot of stupid people who're out there, by the way).
So why would people make viruses that would only infect around 9/10% of computer users? They wouldn't, unless they had a specific target in mind. They would go for the big 90% chunk that is Windows. Their virus wouldn't be compatible with the other OSes, but it wouldn't make Windows any less secure.
In fact, logically Windows should be more secure (not that it is. Talking logically here). As there are all these exploits and viruses that target it, Microsoft are constantly releasing patches and bugfixes. When was the last time you saw Apple release a bugfix? Does this mean a Mac has no bugs? Impossible - there's no way an Operating System can be completely impervious to virus attacks; it means that no one is exploiting the bugs in a Mac.
QED
(Cue minister?s voice . . . Accent Like Harry Connick?s ?The REV? from the movie Independence day?
We are gathered here together to share the worship of the PC in the Church of the Internet that welcomes all denominations to our fold who gather here daily in their righteous life of daily confirmation of our belief in the the supreme PC (PC=Personal Computer, Apple makes them too)
We have gather together with our brothers and sisters from the Church of Apple, our brothers and sisters from the Church of Microsoft, and our brothers and sisters from the Church of Linux to gather in mutual peace and harmony and to worship our one true God, our PCs.
Brothers and sisters, do not go out into the light! For there you will find evil life, and sunlight!
I have a dream! That one day, all OS?s will unite in a virtual world and deny the evil real world of human interaction and living.
I have a dream that sectarian bickering and the true brotherhood of the the Church of the Internet will unite all our brothers and sisters in the endless dialogue and freedom that the virtual world provides.
Brothers and sisters we can treat all encounters as less than human, and not fear reprisals from the real world in our anonymity.
We can treat with contempt all who have a real life, and do not share our belief in the all powerful and mighty Internet!
Because they cannot hit us, find us, or know who we truly are . . . WE ARE FREE!
Free to post, to condemn, to quote the great books of our codes and and manufacturing.
Yea though we must sometimes walk through the valley of reality, we WILL fear no evil, for in virtuality there is the freedom of no consequences for our words and actions!
The meekest and least of you can gird thyselves in rhetoric, and never have to produce anything yourselves, for no one can find you and discover you actually flip hamburgers at the Local McDonalds in the evil real world.
But I dream of a day, when we all unite, and value the diversity of our fellow PCrs, regardless of the color of their OS or its trademark.
I have a dream!
That one day we will unite, and realize the worth of our natural denominations and cease these petty battles and claims of our superiority. That one day we will realize that all are present in the Church of the Internet, and it matters not how they got here!
That all are here to worship the almighty PC is all that matters regardless of how your OS got you here, or the ministers of hate that divide us.
For verily I say unto you! If you do not unite, you surely will have to go out into the sunlight, and get a real life.
I do not care about the color of a PCs skin! As long as you follow the truth of the Church of the Internet, you will be saved!
Your OS is only a path, one of many, leading you here to the freedom of the light of the One true Internet.
Regardless of your path, your self indignant righteousness, if you got here, it is good.
Be not overly proud of the vehicle of your choice to arrive at the true path.
If it got you here it is good, and it works.
Amen.
I use m$ os for fun(when I do not want to use any brain power), Linux when I am serious(when I want to exercise my brain) and (knock on wood) had no problems. Oh the die hard ms'ers will cry, but to you I say repeat out loud very loud till you understand: i am we todd it. i am sofa king we todd it.
Join the conversation!
The best of ZDNet, delivered
ZDNet Newsletters
Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox












