Macworld 2012: Conference at a crossroads
Summary: By day, an Expo getting serious again about refocusing on the user. By night, a bit gritty and underground.
Image 1 of 26

See also: Violet Blue's full report, Macworld 2012: The Island of Misfit Toys
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
RE: Macworld 2012: Conference at a crossroads
RE: Macworld 2012: Conference at a crossroads
She doesn't even have a booth! Maybe ZDNet should have called her a "kiosk kitten." I did some sleuthing, and here's what I found out.
The woman in the white top appears to be Piroska Szurmai-Palotai, the (sole?) developer for NeoPlay Entertainment. She has three apps currently in the App Store and was a first-time exhibitor at the Mobile Apps Showcase this year.
According to her Facebook page, she's also a big fan of chess, listing a chess player as her "favorite athlete." This, of course, is typical of the "booth babe" stereotype, as is her interest in curling (the sport, not her hair).
I don't know too much more about her (since I don't read Hungarian), but if she's "sad" in this photo, it might be because she misses her young child. Of course, she might also merely be tired, bored, or hungry. Or, she might have seen the ZDNet photographer walking by.
RE: Macworld 2012: Conference at a crossroads
RE: Macworld 2012: Conference at a crossroads
Re: Stalking?
RE: Macworld 2012: Conference at a crossroads
RE: Macworld 2012: Conference at a crossroads
Agree
Kevin
http://www.okawards.com
RE: Macworld 2012: Conference at a crossroads
RE: Macworld 2012: Conference at a crossroads
Maybe the photographer could have approached her, taken a full frame shot and run a caption like 'Bright developer rests between QA sessions'.
Finally, 'Booth Babe'? Given the number of women actively engaged in the tech industry, don't you think that kind of sexist caption is a bit inappropriate?
RE: Macworld 2012: Conference at a crossroads
It's revealing to not get additional information to give context to the woman in the booth, but a blog post attack by Gruber and a series of attacks and name-calling in comments on my original article is going too far.
A simple correction would have sufficed, and then you could have seen what I did with it.
Now I am reacting to a Grueber-fueled pile-on and fanboy personal attacks.
My partner and I considered walking up to this booth but the woman's demeanor put us off. My commentary as a take-away of the experience was a reflection of the scene. It's really reaching to brand me a misogynist because I put the woman in a social category based on the environment she was in. I was not the only one to do so. It was not obvious that the woman in the booth was not a booth babe: Macworld was covered with women that were only hired reps - in all manners of dress.
I'm glad for the correction, but the way you have ganged up to attack me as the method of delivery for a correction is repulsive. And, typical.
If you want to know how I really feel about booth babes (though I'm sure you won't because the drive-by is always better) - get some context for booth babes in my column by reading this:
The CES Booth Babe Problem
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/violetblue/the-ces-2012-booth-babe-problem/963
And you will see that Ms. Szurmai-Palotai is exactly the kind of "booth babe" I am referring to - women devs, women hackers. Not the kind some of you seem to instantly think I mean.
One commenter on Twitter suggested I dressed her down for being "not slutty enough." This is absolutely untrue. And is very revealing about the person that said it.
No, I was dismayed because the woman representing the company at Macworld was unapproachable - not because she was female or dressed in a certain way.
RE: Macworld 2012: Conference at a crossroads
You saw a female developer in a booth and assumed she was hired to use her sexuality to sell her product, judged her deficient for the task, took unflattering photography from a distance, posted it to the web, and publicly chastised her for her appearance without even the most basic fact-checking. Your error was pointed out to you almost immediately, but after two days, you have yet to issue anything resembling an apology. You have, however, taken a defensive and condescending tone towards those who, rightly, find your behavior reprehensible.
Next time, go up and talk to Ms. Szurmai-Palotai
RE: Macworld 2012: Conference at a crossroads
RE: Macworld 2012: Conference at a crossroads
Violet, first of all, I'm sorry that you feel "piled on". But having said that...
"It's revealing to not get additional information to give context to the woman in the booth..."
I'm sorry, but as a tech reporter isn't it your job to go out and *find* that information, rather than rely on others to just *give* it to you?
"I was dismayed because the woman representing the company at Macworld was unapproachable"
I don't understand what you're saying here. Is she any more "unapproachable" than the man on the left? Of course not.
I've covered so many trade shows - including a lot of Macworlds - that I've lost count. And I spent a lot of my time going round those smaller booths, digging out the stories. I didn't find anyone unapproachable, and that includes many women representing their companies (including some where they *were* the company).
So really, I don't understand what point you were trying to make. Perhaps explaining it better in the first place might be beneficial next time?
RE: Macworld 2012: Conference at a crossroads
RE: Macworld 2012: Conference at a crossroads
RE: Macworld 2012: Conference at a crossroads
RE: Macworld 2012: Conference at a crossroads
RE: Macworld 2012: Conference at a crossroads
Actually, if she'd been a "booth babe" she'd probably have had someone with her - someone who actually knew a little about the product, you know? Or she'd have been handing something out. Or collecting contact details from attendees (or at least trying).
Look, everyone makes mistakes, I get that. Just admit that you were wrong to jump to this conclusion, if you want to make amends, why not write an article about her role in creating the product (whatever it is) and the challenges faced by developers who risk being mistaken for "booth babes"?
I'm sure (pretty sure) she'd be quite happy to talk about her product.
Anyone who's promoted a product on one of these booths will know, it isn't a barrel of laughs all the time, and you do get bored, hungry, and generally left feeling a bit flat. Just because she's a woman, doesn't mean she has to look "deliriously happy" 100% of the time (I've been there, promoting a product that's taken real effort, watching people walk by, it's pretty hard to not get a little dispirited).
So, why not get her point of view, find out a little about her role, and product. I'd be interested in reading about THAT.
Seem fair?